COMMUNICATIONS
methanol (200 mL) and then dried under vacuum. To cap the unchanged
chloride moieties with methoxy groups, the resin was stirred for 15 min in
CH2Cl2/methanol (1/1, v/v; 15 mL) containing an excess of Et3N (383 mL,
2.75 mmol). The resin was filtered and washed with CH2Cl2 (50 mL), water
(150 mL), and methanol (200 mL). To remove any traces of unchanged
chiral monomer 6 in the resin, 8b was then continuously extracted in a
Soxhlet device with THF for 24h and dried under vacuum. Solid-state 31P
NMR (85% H3PO4 external reference): d ¼ ꢀ11.6 ppm (brs).
Noncovalent Chemistry of Nitrous Oxide:
Interactions with Secondary cis Amides in
Solution**
Grigory V. Zyryanov, Erin M. Hampe, and
Dmitry M. Rudkevich*
The environmental impact of nitrous oxide (N2O) is
enormous. As one of the most abundant components of the
atmosphere, N2O plays a critical role in the destruction of the
ozone layer and contributes to the greenhouse effect.[1]
Emission of N2O into the atmosphere has already reached
13 million tons and is constantly growing. The widespread use
of nitrogen-containing fertilizers and the industrial manufac-
ture of nylon are critical contributors to this amount. The
major natural suppliers of N2O are enzyme-supported nitri-
fication/denitrification processes in soils in which this gas is
the key intermediate.[2] N2O is also involved in a number of
biochemical processes, especially related to anesthesia.[3]
Together with O2 and CO, N2O belongs to the family of
blood gases.
The chemistry of N2O is limited, although it is considered to
be a reliable and nontoxic source of oxygen for catalysis.[4] It is
commonly known as a noncoordinating gas and as a very poor
ligand. Although several metal complexes react with N2O,
[Ru(NH3)5(N2O)]2þ is the only characterized complex to
date.[5]
The rules governing reversible interactions between N2O
and various receptor sites, which usually precede the covalent
fixation and are also responsible for the biochemical action,
are still poorly understood. We report herein the previously
unnoticed noncovalent interactions between secondary
amides and N2O in apolar solutions. N2O frequently circulates
in biological fluids,[2,3] and its rather weak dipole dipole
interactions with hydrophobic fragments of proteins has been
noticed.[6] At the same time, the possibility of its involvement
in hydrogen bonding with proteins and enzymes has been
routinely ignored.
Hydrogen bonding is one of the most important forces in
Nature and is responsible for self-assembly and enzyme
selectivity.[7] In chemistry, it has been used in the design of
effective receptors for polar neutral molecules and anions in
the gas phase, in solution, and in the solid state.[8] Molecules of
gases are known to form hydrogen bonds in the gas phase.
Among the typical examples are the adducts of acidic HF,
HCl, HBr, and HCN with N2, CO, CO2, and OCS,[9] and weak
PhOH¥¥¥Ar (N2, CO) molecular clusters.[10] At the same time,
Received: April 15, 2002 [Z19097]
[1] a) Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Vol. I III (Eds.: E. N. Jacob-
sen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto), Springer, Berlin, 1999; b) Catalytic
Asymmetric Synthesis (Ed.: I. Ojima), Wiley-VCH, NewYork, 2000.
[2] a) Chirality in Industry, Vol. I (Eds.: A. N. Collins, G. N. Sheldrake, J.
Crosby), Wiley, NewYork, 1992; b) Chirality in Industry, Vol. II(Eds.:
A. N. Collins, G. N. Sheldrake, J. Crosby), Wiley, NewYork, 1996.
[3] B. Pugin, H.-U. Blaser in Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Vol. 3
(Eds.: E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto), Springer, Berlin,
1999, p. 1367.
[4] a) C. E. Song, J. W. Yang, H.-J. Ha, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8,
841; b) C. E. Song, C. R. Oh, S. W. Lee, S.-g. Lee, L. Canali, D. C.
Sherrington, Chem. Commun. 1998, 2435; c) C. E. Song, E. J. Roh,
B. M. Yu, D. Y. Chi, S. C. Kim, K.-J. Lee, Chem. Commun. 2000, 615.
[5] Reviews: a) B. M. Trost, D. L. Van Vranken, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 395;
b) B. M. Trost, C. Lee in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis (Ed.: I.
Ojima), Wiley-VCH, NewYork, 2000, p. 593; c) A. Pfaltz, M. Lautens
in Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Vol. 2 (Eds.: E. N. Jacobsen,
A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto), Springer, Berlin, 1999, p. 833.
[6] Heterogeneous versions of other types of chiral ligands for asym-
metric allylic substitutions have recently been reported: a) Y. Uozumi,
K. Shibatomi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2919; b) K. Hallman, E.
Macedo, K. Nordstrˆm, C. Moberg, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10,
4037; c) Y. Uozumi, H. Danjo, T. Hayashi, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
8303; d) M. S. Anson, A. R. Mirza, L. Tonks, J. M. J. Williams,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7147; e) B. F. G. Johnson, S. A. Raynor,
D. S. Shephard, T. Mashmeyer, J. M. Thomas, G. Sankar, S. Bromley,
R. Oldroyd, L. Gladden, M. D. Mantle, Chem. Commun. 1999, 1167.
[7] U. Nagel, Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 425; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1984, 23, 435.
[8] R. G. Hiskey, L. M. Beacham, V. G. Matl, J. N. Smith, E. B. Williams,
A. M. Thomas, E. T. Wolters, J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 488.
[9] Polymer-bound triphenylchloromethane (cross-linked with 1% DVB;
100 200 mesh; ca. 1.1 mmol Cl per gram of resin) was purchased from
Fluka.
[10] R. Manzotti, T. S. Reger, K. D. Janda, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8417.
[11] K. Barlos, O. Chatzi, D. Gatos, G. Stavropoulos, Int. J. Pept. Protein
Res. 1991, 37, 513.
[12] Physical data for 7: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d ¼ 2.15 2.21 (m,
1H), 2.75 2.81 (m, 1H), 3.78 3.83 (m, 1H), 6.24 (d, J ¼ 4.4 Hz, 1H),
6.89 6.93 (m, 1H), 7.16 7.36 (m, 18H), 7.43 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.54
7.58 ppm (m, 1H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): d ¼ 51.93, 55.50,
74.89, 126.73, 128.06, 128.35, 128. 41, 128.97, 129.00, 129.06, 129.09,
129.19, 129.27, 129.73, 130.66, 134.17, 134.25, 134.44, 134.51, 136.49,
136.77, 137.50, 137.60, 137.65, 137.75, 141.07, 141.40, 142.57, 169.76 ppm;
31P NMR (121 MHz, CDCl3, 85% H3PO4 as external reference): d ¼
ꢀ9.6 ppm.
[13] B. M. Trost, D. L. Van Vranken, C. Bingel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 9327.
[14] P. H. Toy, K. D. Janda, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6329.
[*] Prof. Dr. D. M. Rudkevich, Dr. G. V. Zyryanov, E. M. Hampe
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
University of Texas at Arlington
P. O. Box 19065, Arlington, TX 76019 (USA)
Fax : (þ 1)817-272-3808
E-mail: rudkevich@uta.edu
[**] We are grateful to the University of Texas at Arlington for financial
support. Prof. Dr. H. V. R. Dias and D. Jayasundara are acknowledged
for advice and experimental assistance, respectively. We thank Dr. A.
Shivanyuk for the expert assistance with calculations, and Prof. Dr. H.
Kessler for providing us with the reprints of his early work.
3854
¹ 2002 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
0044-8249/02/4120-3854 $ 20.00+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, No. 20