544 A. M. Alafeefya and A. E. Ashourb
quinazoline derivatives were generally more active
than the 3-substituted ones. Within the substituted pip-
eridine derivatives, the mono-substituted compounds
proved to be far more promising than the di-substituted
ones. It seems that electron releasing groups attached
to the piperidine ring has better impact on activity
than electron withdrawing ones; compounds 18 and
22 with 4-hydroxy and 4-piperidyl-piperidine moieties,
respectively, showed the highest activity, followed by
compounds 16 and 17 with 3-hydroxycarbonyl and
3-ethoxycarbonyl, respectively. While in compounds
20 and 21, the 4,4-di-substituted piperidine derivatives
were inactive or very weakly active. Amongst the flexible
4-substituted benzylamine derivatives, compound 14
with 4-chloro group was the most active one followed
by compound 12 (the unsubstituted), while the 4-fluo-
robenzyl derivative was the least active one.
Synthesis
Compounds 1–3 These compounds were prepared in our
laboratory according to reported procedures.
General procedures for the synthesis of compounds 4–11
mixture of 2-phenyl-4-chloroquinazoline (0.666 g,
A
3
0.003 mol) and the appropriate alkyl halide (0.003 mol)
in dry dimethylformamide (10 mL) in presence of
anhydrous potassium carbonate (0.3 g) was stirred for
24 h at room temperature. e solvent was then diluted
with water (30 mL) and the separated solid was filtered,
washed with water, dried and crystallised from ethanol
to afford compounds 4–1l.
4: Yield, 41%; m.p. 135–137°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ
2.90–2.92 (t, 2H, C6H5CH2, J= 7.0 Hz), 4.34–4.36 (t, 2H,
OCH2, J= 7.0 Hz), 7.60–8.22 (m, 14H, Ar-H). 13C NMR: δ
34.40 (C6H5CH2), 64.98 (OCH2), 118.11, 121.95, 126.50,
127.28, 128.16, 129.23, 130.05, 131.15, 133.80, 140.06,
151.34, 163.28, 181.02 (Ar-C). MS (EI): m/z 326 [M+, 32%].
Anal. (C22H18N2O) C, H, N.
Conclusion
is work led to the development of novel anti-tumour
molecules containing 4-substituted aminoquinazoline
pharmacophore. ree cell lines, including MCF-7,
HeLa and HepG2, were used to measure cytotoxic
activity of the proposed quinazoline derivatives. Five
compounds exhibited promising and more potent anti-
tumour activity than the standard drug dasatinib and one
compound showed activity similar to that of dasatinib.
Most of the tested compounds showed varying degrees
of activity against the three selected cell lines and few
compounds were ineffective. Our preliminary results in
this study where we considered three cancer cell lines
will be followed by further studies to explore the exact
mechanism of action of the most active compounds in
addition to lead modifications.
General procedures for the synthesis of 2-phenyl 4-substi-
tuted amino quinazoline derivatives 12–22 A mixture of
compound 3 (0.36 g, 0.0015 mol) and the appropriate
piperidine derivative (0.0015 mol) in acetone (12 mL) in
presence of anhydrous potassium carbonate (0.5 g) was
heated under reflux for 5 h. e solvent was then evapo-
rated under vacuum and the separated solid was filtered,
washed with water, dried and crystallised from ethanol to
afford compounds l2–22.
12: Yield, 87%; m.p. 159–161°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ4.33
(s, 2H, CH2), 6.70 (s, 1H, NH, exchangeable), 7.48–8.25 (m,
14H, Ar-H). 13C NMR: δ 45.84 (CH2), 117.0, 121.05, 126.42,
127.0, 127.41, 128.76, 129.83, 130.25, 130.64, 134.0, 142.16,
150.18, 157.33, 160.15. MS (EI): m/z 311 [M+, 65%]. Anal.
(C21H17N3) C, H, N.
experimental protocol
Chemistry
General
Pharmacology
Materials
Dasatinib was supplied by LC Laboratories® (Woburn,
MA, USA). All other chemicals were obtained from
Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). e cell
lines MCF-7, HeLa and HepG2 were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA).
Tissue culture plates and flasks were purchased from
Costar (Milan, Italy).
All melting points (°C, uncorrected) were determined
on a Stuart melting point apparatus (Stuart Scientific,
Redhill, UK). Elemental analyses (C, H, N) were
performed on Perkin-Elmer 2400 analyser (Perkin-Elmer,
Norwalk, CT, USA) and were in full agreement with the
proposed structures within ≥0.4% of the theoretical
values. IR spectra (KBr) were recorded using Pye Unicam
SP 1000 IR spectrometer (ermoelectron, Egelbach,
Germany) and expressed in wave number υ (cm−1). NMR
spectra were obtained on a Bruker AC 300 Ultra Shield
NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Munich, Germany) at 300
Evaluation of cellular cytotoxicity
e cytotoxic activity of compounds 4–22 against
HepG2 cells, MCF-7 cells and HeLa cells was deter-
mined using sulphorhodamine-B assay as described
by Skehan et al.19. Briefly, stock solutions of the tested
compounds were prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide
(DMSO) and were used for serial dilutions in culture
medium. e final concentration of DMSO in all wells
was adjusted to 0.3%. e tested cell lines were grown
in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% calf
serum. Exponentially growing cells were suspended in
1
MHz for H and 75 MHz for 13C; the chemical shifts are
expressed in δ (ppm) downfield from tetramethylsilane.
Splitting patterns were designated as follows: s: singlet;
d: doublet; t: triplet; m: multiplet. Electron impact mass
spectra were recorded on a Varian Mat 311-A70eV instru-
ment (Varian, Fort Collins, USA). Chemicals used were
supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie
GmbH, Steinheim, Germany).
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry