Y. Cho et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5227–5231
5231
Table 3
Reverse amide B-region with alkyl C-region
O
R1
OCH3
OH
R2
N
H
R1
R2
Ki (nM) binding affinity
EC50 (nM) agonism
Ki (nM) antagonism
24 (Olvanil)
H
H
H
CH3
CH3
CH3
(CH2)7CH@CH(CH2)7CH3
(CH2)7CH3
(CH2)8CH3
(CH2)7CH@CH(CH2)7CH3
(CH2)7CH3
(CH2)8CH3
142 ( 27)
1223 ( 18)
864 ( 10)
226 ( 52)
4275 ( 99)
3300 ( 610)
202 ( 19)
223 ( 47)
83 ( 16)
678 ( 140)
1580 ( 290)a
1250 ( 140)
NE
NE
NE
NE
25
26
29
30
31
(44%)b
(28%)b
A
B
Only fractional calcium uptake (72%) compared with that induced by 300 nM capsaicin.
Only fractional antagonism at 30 M.
l
Table 4
Thiourea B-region with 4-t-butylbenzyl C-region
S
R2
OCH3
OR1
*
N
H
N
H
R1
R2
Ki (nM) binding affinity
EC50 (nM) agonism
Ki (nM) antagonism
2
H
H
H
CH3
H
59 ( 9.0)
194 ( 5)
84 ( 27)
2.6 ( 1.1)
NE
32
34
36
380 ( 160)a
132 ( 34)
(35%)b
NE
CH2CH2NH2
CH2CH2NH2
CH3
1430 ( 520)
5800 ( 1700)
NE
A
B
Only fractional calcium uptake (70%) compared with that induced by 300 nM capsaicin.
Only fractional antagonism at 30 M.
l
the corresponding acetamides. The similar SAR pattern was also
observed in the thiourea B-region. The -methylated thioureas
32 and 36 showed marked loss of binding affinity compared to 2
and 34 by 3- and 17-fold. The result indicated that, different from
References and notes
a
1. Szallasi, A.; Blumberg, P. M. Pharmacol. Rev. 1999, 51, 159.
2. Nagy, I.; Santha, P.; Jancso, G.; Urban, L. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 500, 351.
3. Alawi, K.; Keeble, J. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 125, 181.
4. Tominaga, M.; Caterina, M. J.; Malmberg, A. B.; Rosen, T. A.; Gilbert, H.; Skinner,
K.; Raumann, B. E.; Basbaum, A. I.; Julius, D. Neuron 1998, 21, 531.
5. Caterina, M. J.; Schumacher, M. A.; Tominaga, M.; Rosen, T. A.; Levine, J. D.;
Julius, D. Nature 1997, 389, 816.
6. Zygmunt, P. M.; Petersson, J.; Andersson, D. A.; Chuang, H.; Sorgard, M.; Di
Marzo, V.; Julius, D.; Hogestatt, E. D. Nature 1999, 400, 452.
7. Hwang, S. W.; Cho, H.; Kwak, J.; Lee, S. Y.; Kang, C. J.; Jung, J.; Cho, S.; Min, K. H.;
Suh, Y. G.; Kim, D.; Oh, U. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 6155.
8. Walpole, C. S.; Wrigglesworth, J. R. Capsaicin in the study of pain; Academic
Press: San Diego, CA, 1993.
9. Appendino, G.; Szallasi, A. Life Sci. 1997, 60, 681.
10. Julius, D.; Basbaum, A. I. Nature 2001, 413, 203.
11. Gunthorpe, M. J.; Chizh, B. A. Drug Discovery Today 2009, 14, 56.
12. Wong, G. Y.; Gavva, N. R. Brain Res. Rev. 2009, 60, 267.
13. Szallasi, A.; Cortright, D. N.; Blum, C. A.; Eid, S. R. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2007, 6, 357.
14. Westaway, S. M. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2589.
the amide B-region, the
a-methylation of the reverse amide and
thiourea might interfere with appropriate hydrogen bonding with
the receptor due to steric hindrance.
In summary, we have synthesized a series of TRPV1 agonists
with the amide, reverse amide, and thiourea groups in the B-re-
gion along with their corresponding
a-methylated analogues.
Within the amide analogues, the -methylation enhanced binding
a
affinity and agonism compared to the parent agonist due to favor-
able hydrogen bonding interaction or additional hydrophobic
interaction of a methyl in the binding site. By contrast, the
a-
methylation of the reverse amide and thiourea agonists led to
the reduction in receptor activity, suggesting that the placement
of a methyl group might interfere with appropriate hydrogen
bonding with the receptor due to steric hindrance. The SAR anal-
15. Krause, J. E.; Chenard, B. L.; Cortright, D. N. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2005, 6, 48.
16. Conway, S. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1530.
17. Kim, Y. S.; Kil, M. J.; Kang, S. U.; Ryu, H.; Kim, M. S.; Cho, Y.; Bhondwe, R. S.;
Thorat, S. A.; Sun, W.; Liu, K.; Lee, J. H.; Choi, S.; Pearce, L. V.; Pavlyukovets, V.
A.; Morgan, M. A.; Tran, R.; Lazar, J.; Blumberg, P. M.; Lee, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2012, 20, 215.
ysis of
steric effect in the B-region as critical for receptor binding. The
SAR of the two enantiomers of the -methylated amide is under-
a-methylation implicates hydrogen bonding as well as a
a
18. Lee, J.; Kang, S. U.; Kil, M. J.; Shin, M.; Lim, J. O.; Choi, H. K.; Jin, M. K.; Kim, S. Y.;
Kim, S. E.; Lee, Y. S.; Min, K. H.; Kim, Y. H.; Ha, H. J.; Tran, R.; Welter, J. D.; Wang,
Y.; Szabo, T.; Pearce, L. V.; Lundberg, D. J.; Toth, A.; Pavlyukovets, V. A.; Morgan,
M. A.; Blumberg, P. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 4136.
19. Lee, J.; Kang, S. U.; Choi, H. K.; Lim, J. O.; Kil, M. J.; Jin, M. K.; Kim, K. P.; Sung, J.
H.; Chung, S. J.; Ha, H. J.; Kim, Y. H.; Pearce, L. V.; Tran, R.; Lundberg, D. J.; Wang,
Y.; Toth, A.; Blumberg, P. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2291.
20. Wang, Y.; Szabo, T.; Welter, J. D.; Toth, A.; Tran, R.; Lee, J.; Kang, S. U.; Suh, Y. G.;
Blumberg, P. M. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 62, 947.
21. Kang, D. W.; Kim, Y. S.; Lim, K. S.; Kim, M. S.; Pearce, L. V.; Pavlyukovets, V. A.; Tao,
A. K.; Lang-Kuhs, K. A.; Blumberg, P. M.; Lee, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 8092.
22. Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Kang, M.-S.; Kim, K.-P.; Chung, S.-J.; Blumberg; Lee, J.; Lee, J.;
Kang, M.-S.; Kim, K.-P.; Blumberg, P. M.; Yi, J.-B.; Park, Y. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2002, 10, 1171.
way to further explore interactions with the receptor.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grants R11-2007-107-02001-0
from the NRF and was supported in part by the Intramural Research
Program of the National Institutes of Health, Center for Cancer Re-
search, National Cancer Institute (Project Z1A BC 005270). We thank
other members of the Blumberg group for assistance with some of
the assays.