Facile solvent-free one-pot synthesis of pyranobenzopyrans and their derivatives
671
The progress of the reaction was monitored on TLC. for the synthesis of amides from esters.27 Here we have
The reaction mixture was then poured into crushed ice presented a simple protocol for the conversion of esters
and stirred for about 2 h. The solid was filtered under into amides at ambient temperature using a mild base
suction. The residue was dried and recrystallised from a such as pyridine. It was observed that the ester group
mixture of 80% ethanol and DMF to afford 7a: Cream was extremely reactive and various secondary amines
coloured solid (1.51 g 53%). M.p. 267–268◦C; IR (neat) (4a–e) could be condensed on to pyranobenzopyrans
υmax 3227, 3060, 3040, 2896, 2960, 2825, 1787, 1721, in good yields. Also different pyranobenzopyrans 3a–c
1
1640 cm−1; H-NMR (DMSOd6, 300 MHz) δ 3.01 could be condensed with 6a to give the cyclized prod-
(s, 2H), 6.42 (s,1H), 7.31–8.52 (m, 4H), 7.90–8.11 ucts 7a–c. One pot reactions are more efficient than
(s, 2H) ppm; EI-MS (m/z) 327 (M+), 227, 198, 170. the conventional methods as they reduce the time and
Anal. Calcd for C16H11N3O4S: C-55.04, N-12.84, S- energy required for the work-up and isolation of the
9.80, H-2.77. Found: C-55.37, N-12.65, S-9.76, H-2.52. product, thus adhering to green chemistry principles.28
See Supplementary information for complete charac- Since we were able to isolate and characterize 3a and 3c
terization and experimental details of the remaining as well as their various derivatives, we tried to improve
analogs.
the efficiency of the process by carrying out one-pot
reaction (schemes 2 and 3, tables 2 and 3).
3. Results and discussion
4. Conclusion
The condensation of β-ketoesters with phenolic com-
pounds in the presence of concentrated sulfuric acid
is called Pechmann reaction.23 Various lewis acid cat-
alysts have also been employed in the past for this
purpose. Base catalysed condensation has also been
reported.24 In the present investigation an attempt has
been made to synthesize pyranobenzopyrans 3a–c by
condensing substituted 4-hydroxycoumarins 1a–c with
dimethylcetone1,3-dicarboxylate. For this purpose, we
In summary, we have developed a sequential one-pot
reaction for the synthesis of a variety of substituted ben-
zopyrans using simple chemistry that would save time
and resources thereby making the process efficient and
environmentally benign. The simplicity, ease of work-
up, together with the use of inexpensive and efficient
base catalyst, is the notable feature of this procedure.
first employed various catalysts like concentrated sulfu- Supplementary information
ric acid, aluminium trichloride but no conversion to the
The electronic supplementary information can be seen
desired product was observed with only starting mate-
rial being recovered. The reaction was then performed
using a base catalyst such as pyridine, in the presence
of various solvents like ethanol and ethyl acetate but
the reaction time was very long with poor yields. On
the other hand, simply mixing and refluxing the two
reactants together neatly, in the presence of catalytic
amount of pyridine (10 mol%) resulted in the formation
of compound 3a–c in good yields (scheme 1, table 1).
With the desired pyranobenzopyrans 3a–c in hand,
we initially set out to test the reactivity of the active
methylene group by performing Mannich and Knoeve-
nagel reactions on it. But the conversions to desired
product were not effected indicating the inactivity of the
moiety. The reactivity of the ester group was then tested
by condensing pyranobenzopyrans 3a and 3c with vari-
ous secondary amines to synthesize substituted amides
5a–h in good to excellent yields (scheme 2, table 2).
The synthesis of amides from esters in general could
be effected using trialkylaluminium or under vigor-
ous conditions with a strong base and higher temper-
ature.25,26 Microwave heating has also been employed
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Ramnarain Ruia College for
providing research facilities and University Grants Com-
mission (UGC) for funding.
References
1. Cravotta G, Nano G M, Palmisano G and Tagliapietra S
2003 Synthesis 1286
2. Stahmann A, Ikawa M and Link K P 1948 Chem. Abstr.
42 P603H
3. Emmanuel-Giota A A, Fylaktakidou K C, Hadjipavlou-
Litina D J, Litinas K E and Nicolaides D N 2001 J. Het.
Chem. 38 717
4. Kontogiorgis C and Litina H D 2003 J. Enzym. Med. 18
63
5. Marcu M G, Schulte W T and Neckers L 2000 J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 92 242
6. Nofal Z M, El-Zahar M I and Abd El-Karim S S 2000
Molecules 5 99