CHEMICAL STRUCTURE AND REACTIONS
159
chloroform. The reaction mixture was cooled and disꢀ
The reaction rates of complexes in AcOH and
solved in chloroform. The solution in CHCl3 was CF3COOH were determined from the drop of comꢀ
washed many times with warm distilled water in a sepꢀ pound concentrations monitored by spectrophotomeꢀ
arating funnel to remove phenol, concentrated by parꢀ try. The measurements were performed in 1ꢀcm path
tial removal of the solvent, and chromatographed on length cells placed into a special thermostated chamꢀ
an Al2O3 column (Brockmann activity grade II) using ber of the spectrophotometer. Accuracy of solution
chloroform. Two zones were obtained: green and temperature determination was 0.1 K. Solutions of
green–brown. The substances isolated from the first complexes in sulfuric acid were prepared immediately
and the second zones were subjected to repeated chroꢀ prior to thermostating. The kinetics of complexes oxiꢀ
matography.
dation reactions was studied by the isolation method.
Rate constants and activation energies (keff Eeff
were determined using dependences log[(A0 )/(
)] vs , lnkeff vs. 1/ , respectively, standard deviaꢀ
tions were found by least squares using Microsoft
Excel software. Here A0 , and are the optical
densities of solutions at working wavelength at time (
equal to 0, current , and the time of reaction compleꢀ
tion; is temperature. Activation entropy
reaction was determined by the Eyring equation in appliꢀ
cation to liquid systems for the second standard state.
100% Acetic acid was prepared by fractional
defrost of glacial AcOH (water content of 0.078% was
determined by the Karl Fischer titration).
,
)
The chromatography of the substance from the
–
A
A –
green zone on a column with silica gel (40/100 Cheꢀ
mapol) using benzene as an eluent afforded an indiꢀ
vidual orange zone containing (Cl)ReTPP. The zone
∞
τ
A
.
T
T
∞
containing
μ
ꢀoxoꢀdimeric form of Re5+ compound
,
A
A
∞
τ
[O=ReTPP]2O and concentrated at the top of the colꢀ
umn was eluted with a CHCl3–C2H5OH (1 : 1).
τ)
τ
≠
The chromatography of substance from the green–
brown zone on a silica gel column using benzene as an
eluent gave a pink zone of (PhO)ReTPP. Next,
[O=ReTPP]2O was eluted with a CHCl3–C2H5OH
(1 : 1).
T
) of
(ΔSeff
Solid amorphous samples of the complexes were
isolated from solutions by solvent evaporation at ambiꢀ
ent temperature. The individuality and chromatoꢀ
graphic purity of the products were confirmed by TLC
on silica gel Silufol plates using benzene. For
(Cl)ReTPP Rf = 0.80, for (PhO)ReTPP Rf = 0.83.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The prepared compounds were identified as pentaꢀ
coordinated rhenium(III) complexes (X)ReTPP and
hexacoordinated iridium(III) complexes (L)(X)IrTPP
from the hypsoꢀtype UVꢀVis spectra typical of porꢀ
phyrin complexes of triply charged metal cations [18]
and from the data of IR and 1H NMR spectroscopy that
agree well with those reported in [16, 17]. The results of
identification of axial ligands X and L are given below.
(Cl)ReTPP. Yield 0.5%. UVꢀvis (CHCl3, λmax
nm): 555 (shoulder), 525, 495 (shoulder), 416. UVꢀvis
,
(AcOH, λmax, nm): 540 (shoulder), 520, 480, 437
ν
(shoulder), 417. IR (300–2000 cm–1, as KBr pellet,
,
cm–1): phenyl substituents, 705, 759 (
1172 ( (C–H)); 1466, 1595, 1614 ( (C=C)); pyrrole
fragments, 799 ( (C–H)); 1029 (C3–C4 ( (C–N),
(C–H)); 1350 ( (C–N)); 1377 ( (C=N)); coordinaꢀ
γ(C–H)); 1075,
δ
ν
The high reactivity of iridium(III) complexes at the
axial directions was shown in the literature by the
examples of Ir(CO)(Cl)OEP reactions with pyridine,
γ
ν
δ
ν
ν
tion center, 408 (Re–N); 374, 392 (Re–Cl).
Nꢀ(nꢀbutyl)imidazole, and (carboxy)imidazole [12]
(PhO)ReTPP. Yield 7%. UVꢀvis (CHCl3, λmax
,
and transformation of waterꢀsoluble aqua and hydroxy
derivatives of Ir(III) tetra(sulfophenyl)porphyrins in
aqueous and methanolic solutions [10, 19]. The analꢀ
ysis of relative signal intensities in the 1H NMR spectra
of iridium complexes (Table 1) indicates the obvious
dependence of axial ionic and molecular ligands in the
compounds on solvents used at the complex purificaꢀ
tion stage. The solvent also affects the number of comꢀ
pounds present in solution. Thus, the purification of
iridium complex with a benzene–CHCl3 mixture (on
repeated chromatography) leads to emergence of sigꢀ
nals in 1H NMR spectrum in CDCl3 at 2.18, 0.35 ppm
nm, (log
425 (4.3). IR (solid chaotic layer,
substituents, 702, 758 ( (C–H)); 1068, 1178 (
H)); 1487, 1578, 1600 ( (C=C)); 2956, 3060 (
H)); pyrrole fragments, 806 ( (C–H)) 997 (C3–C4,
(C–N), (C–H)); 1340 ( (C–N)); 1377 ( (C=N))
ε)): 660 (shoulder), 551 (2.3), 436 (shoulder),
ν
, cm–1): phenyl
(C–
(C–
γ
δ
ν
ν
γ
;
ν
δ
ν
ν
;
coordination center, 418 (Re–N); 663 (Re–O); axial
ligand, 1265, 1462, 1542 (–OPh). 1Н NMR (CDCl3,
δ, ppm: 8.95 (d, 8H ), 8.25, 8.15 (d, m, 8Hо); 7.80 (m,
β
8Hm), 7.55 (m, 4Hp), 3.63 (s, 2Ho (OPh)), 4,71 (s, 2Hm
(OPh)), 5,37 (s, 1Hp (OPh)).
UVꢀvis, IR, and NMR spectra were recorded on an and –1.41 ppm related by us to the proton signals of
Agilent 8453 UVꢀVis and a Specord Mꢀ400 spectrophoꢀ coordinated H2O and hydroxide ion OH–, respectively
tometers, a VERTEX 80v spectrometer, and a Bruker [20, 21]. At the same time, the presence of two distinct
AVANCEꢀ500 radiospectrometer (using TMS as an singlets of pyrrole H protons at = 9.06 and 8.9 ppm
δ
internal reference), respectively. Solid layers of comꢀ and two sets of resonβances for the Ho, Hm, and Hp proꢀ
plexes for IR spectral study were prepared by evaporaꢀ tons of meso phenyl substituents indicates the presence
tion of CHCl3 solvent from a solution of complex on a of (H2O)(Cl)IrTPP and (H2O)(OH)IrTPP at equilibꢀ
silicon plate.
rium in the solution in a 10 : 1 ratio.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 60 No. 2 2015