Acknowledgements
We thank Ms Sabine Mika for recording NMR spectra and Drs
Heiko Leutbecher and Alevtina Baskakova for recording mass
spectra.
Notes and references
‡The activities of the laccases from T. versicolor or A. bisporus were
determined following a modified procedure taken from Danieli et al.14f
using a solution of ABTS [2.2′-azinobis-(-3-ethylbenzothiazolyl-6-sulfo-
nic acid)] as the substrate. The change in absorption was followed via
UV spectroscopy (λ = 414 nm; ε414 = 31 100 L mol−1 cm−1). 1 U is
equivalent to the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of
1 μmol ABTS per minute at 24 °C and corresponding pH.
§General procedure for the synthesis of biphenyls 19a–d: A solution of
a vanillidene derivative 15 in DMSO (8 mL) was added to NaOAc
buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0, 72 mL). Laccase from T. versicolor (4 U, 0.4 mg)
was added and the reaction mixture was stirred under air at room temp-
erature for the reaction times given in Table 3. After extraction with
CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL) the combined organic phases were dried over
MgSO4, filtered and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography over silica gel to afford the biphenyl
19 in analytically pure form.
¶Selected analytical data for 5,5′-di(2,2-diacetylvinyl)-2,2′-dihydroxy-
3,3′-dimethoxybiphenyl (19b): Rf 0.20 (CH2Cl2–MeOH = 40 : 1); 1H
NMR δH(300 MHz; DMSO-d6) 2.23 (6H, s, 4′′-H or 2′′′-H), 2.35 (6H, s,
4′′-H or 2′′′-H), 3.80 (6H, s, OCH3 and OCH3′), 6.90 (2H, s, 6-H and
6′-H), 7.04 (2H, s, 4-H and 4′-H) and 7.60 (s, 2H, 1′′-H); 13C NMR
δC(75 MHz; DMSO-d6) 26.09 (C-4′′ or C-2′′′), 31.40 (C-4′′ or C-2′′′),
55.87 (OCH3 and OCH3′), 112.33 (C-4 and C-4′), 123.03 (C-5 and
C-5′), 125.06 (C-1 and C-1′), 126.16 (C-6 and C-6′), 139.65 (C-2′′),
140.14 (C-1′′), 147.08 (C-2 and C-2′), 147.69 (C-3 and C-3′), 197.20
(C-1′′′ or C-3′′) and 206.37 (C-1′′′ or C-3′′).
Fig. 5 Numbering of 19b and important HMBC correlations.
1H and 13C chemical shifts was achieved by evaluating their
COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra. As an example, the molecular
formula of compound 19b¶ (C26H26O8) was established by
HRMS (ESI pos.) analysis of its [M + H]+ at m/z 467.1700 (cal-
culated for C26H27O8, 467.1706). This result indicated that 19b
is a dimer originating from oxidative coupling of two substrate
molecules 15b. Furthermore, the 1H NMR spectrum of 19b exhi-
bits two singlets corresponding to two aromatic protons and one
singlet corresponding to a vinylic proton in a 1 : 1 : 1-ratio of
signals suggesting – in accordance with the mass spectrum – that
the product could be symmetrical (Fig. 5). A single set of 13
signals in the 13C NMR spectrum of 19b confirms the symmetri-
4
cal structure of the compound. A J4-H,6-H coupling constant of
1 (a) N. G. Lewis and L. B. Davin, in Comprehensive Natural Products
Chemistry, ed. D. Barton, K. Nakanishi and O. Meth-Cohn, Elsevier,
London, 1999, vol. 1, p. 639; (b) N. G. Lewis and S. Sarkanen, Lignin
and Lignan Biosynthesis, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC,
1996, p. 1.
2 N. G. Lewis, L. B. Davin and S. Sarkanen, in Comprehensive Natural
Products Chemistry, ed. D. Barton, K. Nakanishi and O. Meth-Cohn,
Elsevier, Oxford, 1999, vol. 3, p. 617.
3 (a) C. T. Brett, G. Wende, A. C. Smith and K. W. Waldron, J. Sci. Food
Agric., 1999, 79, 421; (b) J. Ralph, S. Quideau, J. H. Grabber and
R. D. Hatfield, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 3485.
4 (a) D. Dobberstein and M. Bunzel, J. Sci. Food Agric., 2010, 90, 1802;
(b) M. Bunzel, J. Ralph, P. Brüning and H. Steinhart, J. Agric. Food
Chem., 2006, 54, 6409; (c) L. Saulnier and J.-F. Thibault, J. Sci. Food
Agric., 1999, 79, 396.
5 M. F. Andreasen, A.-K. Landbo, L. P. Christensen, A. Hansen and
A. S. Meyer, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001, 49, 4090.
6 S. K. Manna, J. S. Bose, V. Gangan, N. Raviprakash, T. Navaneetha,
P. B. Raghavendra, B. Babajan, C. S. Kumar and S. K. Jain, J. Biol.
Chem., 2010, 285, 22318.
7 (a) G. Lessene and K. S. Feldman, in Modern Arene Chemistry, ed.
D. Astruc, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002, ch. 14, p. 479; (b) T. Pal and
A. Pal, Curr. Sci., 1996, 71, 106; (c) T. Kametani and K. Fukumoto,
Synthesis, 1972, 657; (d) H. Musso, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1963, 2,
723.
8 (a) S. Riva, Trends Biotechnol., 2006, 24, 219; (b) A. M. Mayer and
R. C. Staples, Phytochemistry, 2002, 60, 551; (c) C. F. Thurston, Micro-
biology, 1994, 140, 19–26.
1.6 Hz along with the HMBC correlations between 6-H and C-2,
C-4, C-5 and C-1′′ as well as between 4-H and C-2, C-3, C-6
and C-1′′ arrange 4-H and 6-H on the same benzene ring. In
addition, the HMBC correlation between 1′′-H and C-4, C-6 and
the two carbonyl groups revealed that the vanillidene double
bonds of the two substrate molecules remain unaffected during
the oxidative coupling (Fig. 5).
In summary, we have reported on the laccase-catalyzed oxi-
dative dimerization of di- and trisubstituted vanillidene deriva-
tives with aerial O2 as the oxidant under mild reaction
conditions. Depending on the substitution pattern of the vanilli-
dene double bond, the formation of different products was
observed. While the oxidative coupling of ferulic acid [(E)-1]
resulted in the formation of dilactone 16 as the main product, the
dihydrobenzo[b]furans 17a–e were obtained from the dimeriza-
tion of the disubstituted vanillidenes 14a–e. With trisubstituted
vanillidene β-dicarbonyls 15a–d as substrates, the corresponding
biphenyls 19a–d were formed exclusively and with excellent
yields. The advantages of the laccase-catalyzed oxidative coup-
ling of phenols are obvious: they can be easily run using a com-
mercially available and cheap enzyme as the catalyst which is
non-toxic and environmentally benign. In addition, there is no
need for a cofactor and cofactor regeneration; laccase-catalyzed
processes employ O2, which is the cheapest and most abundant
oxidant, and water is the only by-product formed. The reactions
can be run at room temperature in an aqueous solvent system.
And last but not least the laccase-catalyzed oxidative phenolic
couplings presented here compare well with other oxidants con-
cerning selectivity and yields.
9 (a) E. I. Solomon, A. J. Augustine and J. Yoon, Dalton Trans., 2008,
3921; (b) H. Claus, Arch. Microbiol., 2003, 179, 145.
10 P. Anastas and P. Tundo, Green Chemistry: Challenging Perspectives,
Oxford University Press, 2000.
11 (a) D. Monti, G. Ottolina, G. Carrea and S. Riva, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111,
4111; (b) F. Hollmann, I. W. C. E. Arends, K. Buehler, A. Schallmey and
B. Bühler, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 226; (c) S. Witayakran and
A. J. Ragauskas, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 1187.
12 (a) H. Leutbecher, M.-A. Constantin, S. Mika, J. Conrad and U. Beifuss,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 604; (b) C. Asta, J. Conrad, S. Mika and
2378 | Green Chem., 2012, 14, 2375–2379
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012