640 Feng et al.
Asian J. Chem.
the thymus and spleen indexes of CTX group significantly
decreased (p < 0.05), while the decrease of the liver index was
not significant (p > 0.05), suggesting both the thymus and
spleen had atrophied and thus probably couldn’t perform
immune function normally because of injection of CTX. As
shown in Table-4, liver indexes showed no significant diffe-
rence between any two groups. The thymus indexes of LA-
CTX group, LT-CTX group, LC-CTX group and LF-CTX
group showed significant increases, compared with that of CTX
group (p < 0.05). The spleen indexes of LH-CTX group, LC-
CTX group, LT-CTX group and LF-CTX group were signifi-
cantly higher than that of CTX group (p < 0.05). However,
both the spleen and thymus indexes of LT-CTX group and
LF-CTX group showed no significant difference when com-
pared with those of control group (p > 0.05), whereas they
were significantly higher than the spleen and thymus indexes
of the remaining groups, indicating LF and LT were more
effective on restoration of immune organs than other salts,
which may be attributed to their higer bioavailablity. Further-
more, the spleen and thymus indexes of LF-CTX group were
not significantly different from those of LT-CTX group (p >
0.05), which was in accordance with the above result for their
serum antiboby contents, suggesting that LF and LT had similar
effects on immune enhancement. However, studies on bioavail-
ablity are necessary to further confirm the results, because
demonstration of bioequivalence is generally the most appro-
priate method of substantiating therapeutic equivalence
between medicinal products which are pharmaceutically
equivalent or pharmaceutical alternatives28.
REFERENCES
1. P.B. Faanes, P. Dillon and Y.S. Choi, Clin. Exp. Immunol., 27, 502
(1977).
2. E. Soppi, O. Lassila, M.K. Viljanen and O.P. Lehtonen, Clin. Exp.
Immunol., 38, 609 (1979).
3. Z.I. Qureshi, L.A. Lodhi and H. Jamil, Vet. Arhiv., 70, 59 (2000).
4. H.A.C.C. Perera and A. Pathiratne, In eds.: M.G. Bondad-Reantaso,
C.V. Mohan, M. Crumlish and R.P. Subasinghe, Enhancement of im-
mune responses in Indian carp, Catla catla, following adiministration
of levamisole by immersion, Diseases in Asian Aquaculture VI. Fish
Health Section, Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines, pp. 129-
142 (2008).
5. S.M. Aly, O. Abd-Allah, A. Mahmoud and H. Gafer, Mediter. Aquacult.
J., 1, 8 (2010).
6. P. Stasiak, M. Sznitowska, C. Ehrhardt, M. Luczyk-Juzwa and P. Grieb,
AAPS Pharm. Sci. Technol., 11, 1636 (2010).
7. J.N. Hemenway, P. Jarho, J.T. Henri, S.K. Nair, D. VanderVelde, G.I.
Georg and V.J. Stella, J. Pharm. Sci., 99, 1810 (2010).
8. N.H. Nam, Y. Kim, Y.J. You, D.H. Hong, H.M. Kim and B.Z. Ahn,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 11, 1021 (2003).
9. P. Hewawasam, M. Ding, N. Chen, D. King, J. Knipe, L. Pajor, A.
Ortiz, V.K. Gribkoff and J. Starrett, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 13, 1695
(2003).
10. B. Mizrahi andA.J. Domb, AAPS. Pharm. Sci. Technol., 10, 453 (2009).
11. S. Miyazaki, M. Oshiba and T. Nadai, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 29, 883
(1981).
12. Y. Ueda, J.D. Matiskella, J. Golik, T.P. Connolly, T.W. Hudyma, S.
Venkatesh, M. Dali, S.-H. Kang, N. Barbour, R. Tejwani, S. Varia, J.
Knipe, M. Zheng, M. Mathew, K. Mosure, J. Clark, L. Lamb, I. Medin,
Q. Gao, S. Huang, C.-P. Chen and J.J. Bronson, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 13, 3669 (2003).
13. H. Thakuria, A. Pramanik, B.M Borah and G. Das, Tetrahedron. Lett.,
47, 3135 (2006).
14. H. Darius, T. Münzel, K. Huber, E. Sultan and U. Walter, J. Kardiol.,
16, 412 (2009).
15. N. Kumar, Shishu, G. Bansal, S. Kumar and A.K. Jana, AAPS Pharm.
Sci. Technol., 13, 863 (2012).
Except for an immunomodulator, (S)-levamisole hydro-
chloride was recently shown to be an inhibitor of angiogenesis
in vitro and exhibited tumor growth inhibition in mice, but
N-alkylated levamisole derivatives (N-methyllevamisole and
p-bromolevamisole) proved more effective than (S)-levamisole
hydrochloride, with respect to inhibition of angiogenesis and
induction of undifferentiated cluster morphology in human
umbilical vein endothelial cells grown in co-culture with
normal human dermal fibroblasts29. This suggests that investi-
gations of organic acid salts of LMS on inhibition of angioge-
nesis and tumor growth may be worth carrying out.
16. Z. Rahman, A.S. Zidan, R. Samy, V.A. Sayeed and M.A. Khan, AAPS
Pharm. Sci. Technol., 13, 793 (2012).
17. K.H. Cho and H.G. Choi, Pharm. Dev. Technol., 39, 901 (2013).
18. H.J. Vial, S. Wein, C. Farenc, C. Kocken, O. Nicolas, M.L. Ancelin, F.
Bressolle, A. Thomas and M. Calas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101,
15458 (2004).
19. O. Nicolas, D. Margout, N. Taudon, S. Wein, M. Calas, H.J. Vial and
F.M.M. Bressolle, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 49, 3631 (2005).
20. G. Shi, X. Wang, L. Tao et al., Effects of OrganicAcid in Folium Isatidis
on the Immune Organ Index and Activity of Enzymes Involved in Free
Radicals of Immunosuppressed Mice. In: International Conference on
Human Health and Biomedical Engineering (HHBE), IEEE Piscataway
NJ USA, pp. 227-300 (2011).
Conclusion
21. J.D. Buhr and G. Widmann, In ed.: L.M. Lu, Application Handbook
Thermal Analysis: Pharmaceuticals Food, Shanghai, Donghua University
Press, pp. 1-10 (2011).
In this study, the immune function of CTX-induced
immunosuppressed mice was restored and enhanced by organic
acid salts of LMS in different degrees, making the spleen and
thymus indexes increased as well as the serum IgG and IgM
content. The preliminary immunological evaluation indicated
the pharmacological effects of LF and LT was better than that
of levamisole hydrochloride and the remaining organic acid
salts, suggesting some value in clinical application that LF
and LT can be administered with a smaller dosage than that of
LH. Considering the cost, LT is more acceptable. However,
studies on bioavailablity are essential for the full evaluation
of organic acid salts of LMS on immune function.
22. A. Winkelstein, Blood, 41, 273 (1973).
23. J.F. Xu, J.M. Qu, L.X. He and Z.L. Ou, Chin. Med. J., 119, 1421 (2006).
24. X. He, X.J. Yang and Y.M. Guo, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 139, 186
(2007).
25. K. Mccutcheon, E. O’Hara and D. Fei, Immunol. Invest., 34, 199 (2005).
26. K. Kawabata, T. Yamamoto, A. Hara, M. Shimizu, Y. Yamada, K.
Matsunaga, T. Tanaka and H. Morie, Cancer Lett., 157, 15 (2000).
27. Y. Song, J. Yang, W.L. Bai and W. Ji, Phytother. Res., 25, 909 (2011).
28. R.K. Verbeeck, I. Kanfer and R.B. Walker, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 28, 1
(2006).
29. S. Hansen, M. Vulic', J. Min, T.J.Yen, M.A. Schumacher, R.G. Brennan
and K. Lewis, PLoS ONE, 7, e39185 (2012).