Figure 5. Sensitivity of the nucleosides 1aꢀ1h toward solvent
polarity in dioxane, water, and their mixtures. The black bars
represent the slope of the Stokes shift and ET30 value. The gray
bars represent the slope of the fluorescence quantum yield and
ET 30 value. a Due to quenching by H2O, slopes were determined
in organic solvents for 1c and 1f.
Figure 6. (A) Plot between the emission wavelength of 1aꢀ1h
and calculated HOMOꢀLUMO energy gaps (see SI for calcula-
tion details). (B) Plot between the emission wavelength of the
nucleosides 1aꢀ1h and Mayr’s nucleophilicity parameter (N)
of the isolated aryl groups (R1) for benzene, anisole, thiophene,
N-methylpyrrole, and furan in CH2Cl2.20
This effect can easily be observed under UV illumination,
where samples of Me2NPh appear bright blue to dark
orange, depending on the solvent polarity (Figure 4C).
The emission intensity of Me2NPh is highly sensitive to
solvent polarity, with a slope of 0.006 mol kcalꢀ1 from Φ =
0.071 in dioxane to Φ = 0.008 in MeCN (Figure 4B).
Me2NPh exhibits a low quantum yield in water (Φ = 0.010)
that is 2.7-fold higher in D2O(Φ= 0.027, Table S3A SI). This
type of kinetic isotope effect suggests the presence of proton-
transfer reactions between the excited fluorophore and bulk
solvent that can facilitate nonemissive decay in water.
Consistent with the presence of emissive TICT states,12
the emissions from 1aꢀ1h exhibit red-shifting and lower
quantum yields with increasing solvent polarity. The
magnitudes of these effects are compared in Figure 5.
The biphenyl derivatives containing electron-donating
substituents MeOPh and Me2NPh exhibit highly solvato-
chromic Stokes shifts and quantum yields. In contrast,
CNPh exhibits diminished solvent sensitivity, and a good
quantum yield over the entire range of solvent polarity
tested (Φ = 0.206ꢀ0.140). Together these results are con-
sistent with 00pushꢀpull00 TICT fluorophores.12 The trends
between the compounds containing a five-membered hetero-
cyclic ring 1eꢀ1h are somewhat more complicated. For
example, 2Fu exhibits quantum yields that are highly sensitive
to solvent polarity (4.2 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 mol kcalꢀ1), whereas it isomer,
3Fu, exhibits very little sensitivity (0.3 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 mol kcalꢀ1).
To systematically compare the theoretical and experi-
mental photophysical properties of the biphenyl deriva-
tives 1aꢀ1d with the biaryl derivatives 1eꢀ1h, the
calculated HOMOꢀLUMO gap for each compound
was plotted against its peak emission wavelength in diox-
ane to give an excellent linear correlation (R2 = 0.981,
Figure 6A). These results suggested that the underlying
photophysical processes are similar for 1aꢀ1h, where
electron-donating groups cause smaller HOMOꢀLUMO
gaps and red-shifted emissions as compared to electron-
withdrawing groups. This conclusion is further supported
by plotting the emission wavelength of each nucleoside
versus the Mayr’s nucleophilicity parameter (N) for the
isolated aryl/heteroaryl group “R1”.20 An excellent linear
correlation between these factors is observed (R2 = 0.983,
Figure 6B). This unusual approach reveals a possible
method to extrapolate nucleophilicityparameters of groups
that cannot be experimentally measured. For example, this
plot can be used to predict a nucleophilicity parameter
for the position 3 of furan (N ≈ ꢀ4.12) based upon the
emission wavelength of 3Fu (λem = 388 nm) in CH2Cl2.
In summary, we have synthesized a new family of fluo-
rescent biaryl pyrimidines in high yield and purity. The
nucleosides exhibit highly solvatochromic emissions from
twisted intramolecular charge-transfer (TICT) states. Previous
studies have demonstrated fluorescent emissions resulting
from charge-transfer recombination in pyrene-modified de-
oxyuridine,21 but to the best of our knowledge, compounds
1aꢀhprovide the first examples of nucleobase analogs that are
“classical” TICT fluorophores.12 Me2NPh (1c) exhibits ab-
sorbance well to the red of unmodified DNA nucleobases and
emissions that are exceptionally sensitive to solvent polar-
ity. Me2NPh is therefore a promising candidate for inves-
tigating local DNA conformational changes by reporting
changes in microenvironmental polarity and solvation.5
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the
Swiss National Science Foundation (#130074) and the
€
University of Zurich.
Supporting Information Available. Figures S1ꢀ12,
Tables S1ꢀS8, experimental procedures, spectroscopic char-
acterizations, fluorescence spectra, molecular orbital plots,
(20) (a) Gotta, M. F.; Mayr, H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9769. (b)
Mayr, H.; Bug, T.; Gotta, M. F.; Hering, N.; Irrgang, B.; Janker, B.;
Kempf, B.; Loos, R.; Ofial, A. R.; Remennikov, G.; Schimmel, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9500. (c) Ammer, J.; Nolte, C.; Mayr, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13902. (d) Mayr, H.; Ofial, A. R. J. Phys. Org.
Chem. 2008, 21, 584. (e) Mayr, H.; Kempf, B.; Ofial, A. R. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2003, 36, 66.
1
and H and 13C NMR spectra. This material is available
(21) Netzel, T. L.; Zhao, M.; Nafisi, K.; Headrick, J.; Sigman, M. S.;
Eaton, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9119.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
D
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX