Recently, metal-free CÀH coupling has attracted much
attention.9 However, the development of a metal-free proto-
col for diarylation of aromatic ketones remains very desir-
able. In a recent project, we developed a molecular iodide
promoted di(hetero)arylation of aromatic ketones with
indoles.10 However, the electron-rich arenes were not toler-
ant for this method. Following up on this work, we herein
reported an I2ÀCF3SO3H synergistic promoted protocol
for the diarylation of aromatic ketones with electron-rich
arenes such as N,N-dialkylanilines, N-methylpyrrole, and
anisole derivatives (Scheme 1, (2)).
Table 1. Optimization Studies for the Synthesis of 3aaa,b
I2
temp
time
(h)
yield
(%)c
entry
(mmol)
cat.
(°C)
1a
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
I2 (1.0)
À
Ti(i-PrO)4
AlCl3
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
110
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
4
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
55
Initially, the reaction of aryl methyl ketone (1a) and
N,N-dimethylaniline (2a) was selected as a model reaction for
optimization of the conditions. First, we screened a series of
Lewis acids, such as Ti(i-PrO)4, AlCl3, ZnCl2, FeCl3, InCl3,
and NbCl5, for this reaction, but none of the desired product
3aa was obtained (Table 1, entries 1À5). We then screened
various Brønsted acids and found MeSO3H and CF3SO3H
were particularly effective catalysts (Table 1, entries 8 and 9).
But, other Brønsted acids, such as H2SO4, HOAc, PTSA,
and TFA, could not promote the reaction. In addition, the
reaction could not perform without I2 (Table 1, entry 13).
After several experimental optimizations, we found that 1a
(1.0 mmol) reacted with I2 (1.5 mmol) in DMSO at 100 °Cfor
1À2 h, which was followed by the addition of 2a (2.0 mmol)
and CF3SO3H (50 mol %) for another 1 h. The desired
product was afforded in 68% yield (Table 1, entry 14).
Under the optimal conditions, the scope of aryl methyl
ketones was investigated. As shown in Scheme 2, the
reaction demonstrated good compatibility with various
aromatic ketones; both electron-donating and -withdraw-
ing groups attached to the phenyl group of 1 could afford
the corresponding products with moderate to good yields,
such as Me, OMe, 2,4-(OMe)2, Cl, Br, and NO2 groups.
And the electronic properties of aromatic ketones (2eÀ2i)
had little influence on the efficiency of the reaction.
Furthermore, the heteroaryl methyl ketones, such as fur-
anyl (1i), thiophenyl (1j, 1k), benzofuryl (1l), and morpho-
linyl (1o), were investigated under the optimal conditions.
To our delight, the corresponding products 3iaÀ3la and
2a
3a
FeCl3
4a
InCl3
5a
NbCl5
6a
H2SO4
7a
HOAc
8a
MeSO3H
CF3SO3H
PTSA
9a
4
58
10a
11a
12b
13a
14b
15b
16b
6
n.r.
n.r.
62
TFA
10
2
CF3SO3H
CF3SO3H
CF3SO3H
CF3SO3H
CF3SO3H
12
2
n.r.
68
I2 (1.5)
I2 (2.0)
I2 (1.5)
3
67
3
62
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol), 2a (2.0 mmol), I2 (1.0 mmol)
catalyst (0.5 mmol, 50 mol %), heated in 3 mL of DMSO. b Reaction
conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol) and I2 in DMSO at 100 °C for 1À2 h. To this
reaction mixture were added 2a (2.0 mmol) and CF3SO3H (0.5 mmol) at
100 °C, until the disappearance of 2a, monitored by TLC. c Isolated yield.
3oa were also afforded in moderate yields (50%À63%).
Meanwhile, 2-naphthyl and 1-naphthyl methyl ketones
(1m and 1n) also reacted with N,N-dimethylaniline 2a to
give satisfying results (75% and 71% yields). Furthermore,
the target compounds 3ca were further determined by
X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 1).
Scheme 2. Scope of Aryl Methyl Ketones
(5) (a) Engle, K. M.; Mei, T. S.; Wasa, M.; Yu, J. Q. Acc. Chem. Res.
2012, 45, 788. (b) Daugulis, O.; Do, H. Q.; Shabashov, D. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2009, 42, 1074. (c) Ali, S.; Li, Y. X.; Anwar, S.; Yang, F.; Chen,
Z. S.; Liang, Y. M. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 424. (d) Zhao, Y. S.; Chen, G.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4850. (e) Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Soc.
Chem. 1997, 119, 12382. (f) Moradi, W. A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Soc.
Chem. 2001, 123, 7996.
(6) Laloo, B. M.; Mecadon, H.; Rohman, Md. R.; Kharbangar, I.;
Kharkongor, I.; Rajbangshi, M.; Nongkhlaw, R.; Myrboh, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2012, 77, 707.
(7) Churruca, F.; SanMartin, R.; Tellitu, I.; Domıngues, E. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5925.
(8) Song, B.; Himmler, T.; Goossen, L. J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011,
353, 1688.
(9) (a) Uyanik, M.; Okamoto, H.; Yasui, T.; Ishihara, K. Science 2010,
328, 1376. (b) Uyanik, M.; Suzuki, D.; Yasui, T.; Ishihara, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5331. (c) Wei, W.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.; Wan, X. B. Chem.
Commun. 2011,47, 10827. (d) Chen, L.; Shi, E. B.; Liu, Z. J.; Chen, S. L.; Wei,
W.; Li, H.; Xu, K.; Wan, X. B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 4085. (e) Liu, Z. J.;
Zhang, J.; Chen, S. L.; Shi, E. B.; Xu, Y.; Wan, X. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 3231. (f) Shi, E. B.; Shao, Y.; Chen, S. L.; Hu, H. Y.; Liu, Z. J.;
Zhang, J.; Wan, X. B. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3384. (g) Xie, J.; Jiang, H. L.;
Cheng, Y. X.; Zhu, C. J. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 979.
(10) Zhu, Y. P.; Liu, M. C.; Jia, F. C.; Yuan, J. J.; Gao, Q. H.; Lian,
M.; Wu, A. X. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3392.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX