6254
M. Singh et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 6252–6255
Figure 2. Effect of 33 compounds, 10–42 from scaffold A on apoE production in human CCF-STTG1 astrocytoma cells.
consistent inhibitory effects with varying strengths from com-
pounds 1 through 9 (Chart 2). The three scaffolds A–C, although
fundamentally different, share some common features, viz., vary-
ing number of phenyl rings on minimalist scaffolds. The notewor-
thy difference between the three structures is the lack of an amine
group in scaffolds B and C. The first four compounds have triaryl-
methyl amine scaffolds with all three phenyl groups. Four easily
available amines, viz., dimethylamine, diethylamine, dibutylamine
and pyrrolidine were used in compounds 1–4, respectively. O-ben-
zylbenzoin (5) was easily available from its precursor benzoin (6)
through benzylation, and both the compounds (5 and 6) were se-
lected for screening.10,11 Compound 7, a benzyloxy benzophenone,
and two fragments, hydroxyl benzophenone (8) and benzophenone
(9), were also screened in the biological assay.12 Quantification of
apoE in the conditioned medium of cells treated with these nine
compounds identified the triarylmethyl amines (scaffold A) as
the best apoE inhibitors over the benzoins (scaffold B) and benz-
ophenones (scaffold C) (Fig. 1). Lack of apoE inhibitory activity ob-
served in scaffolds B and C could be attributed to scaffold structure
itself or, absent design elements may be crucial for the desired
activity, viz., the amine moiety and the number of aryl groups. Tri-
arylmethyl amine 4 containing a pyrrolidine group with a hydro-
gen-bond acceptor tertiary amine moiety exhibited maximum
apoE inhibition in this early study.
The promising results from the pilot apoE screen (Fig. 1)
prompted us to undertake further SAR studies to design, synthesize
and screen more triarylmethyl amines (Chart 3). Attention was
paid to include hydrogen bonding donor and acceptor amines in
the final compounds, vary the size of the third aromatic ring and
also include acyclic and cyclic amines of different sizes and shapes.
Thus, each compound in this particular series has two phenyl rings,
a third aryl ring, and a unique amine. Para-methoxyphenyl and
naphthyl aromatic groups were selected for the new set of mole-
cules in order to test the effect of varying size without altering
polarity in this area of the molecule. Altogether, fifteen different
primary and secondary amines provided with added diversity for
the molecules. The amines included aliphatic acyclic amines such
as dimethyl amine, diethyl amine, and dibutyl amine. Aliphatic,
cyclic amines were also included in the study with the selection
of pyrrolidine, piperidine and morpholine. Cyclohexyl amine, ani-
line, isobutyl amine, and sec-butyl amine represent the secondary
and 41 in Chart 3) in their final form. Although 45 molecules (15
amines with 3 aryl variations) were attempted for synthesis and
subsequent biological screening, not every candidate was screened
due to occasional challenges in isolation, purification and in certain
cases with final acceptable purities (e.g., compounds comprising a
naphthyl aryl group and one of the following amines: cyclo-
hexylmethyl amine, dibenzylamine, and piperazine).
The effects of the 33 triarylmethyl amines on apoE production
are shown in Figure 2. The expansion of the series yielded much
greater apoE inhibitory activity than the initial screen. Both the
new aryl groups fared better than the original phenyl series in
terms of apoE inhibition, with the naphthalene moiety resulting
in more pronounced inhibition of apoE production. Among all the
triarylmethyl amine compounds comprising the naphthyl group
(Group C, Chart 3), compounds 36, 38, 40 and 41 inhibited apoE
production by 46%, 49%, 50% and 66%, respectively. Compound 18
from the phenyl series was the only compound that exhibited
respectable apoE inhibition (51%). The corresponding amine func-
tionalities in these four compounds are pyrrolidine (36), morpho-
line (38), isobutyl amine (40), sec-butyl amine (41), and
cyclohexylmethyl amine (18). The presence of hydrogen bond do-
nor vs acceptor groups at the amine functionality, or the acyclic vs
cyclic nature of the amine did not cause any noticeable change in
the inhibitory activity. Six of them (33–38) have hydrogen bond
donor groups and the rest (39–42) have hydrogen bond acceptor
groups and there is an equal mix of acyclic and cyclic structures
around the amine group. The overall size of most of the amine
groups might have played a role in determining the inhibition effi-
cacy since all the four amines in compounds, 36, 38, 40, and 41
comprise approximately 5–6 atoms. The cyclohexylmethyl amine
in compound 18 is slightly larger than these four amines and the
plans are in order to synthesize and screen the naphthyl version
of the triarylmethyl amine molecule with cyclohexylmethyl amine.
The SAR studies have led to the identification of four com-
pounds in the triarylmethyl amines series as preliminary hits for
inhibiting the production of apoE protein. Results have pointed at
the usefulness of the bicyclic naphthalene ring. Additionally, five
specific amine functionalities, viz., pyrrolidine, morpholine, isobu-
tylamine, sec-butylamine, and cyclohexylmethyl amine proved to
be essential. These results also provide additional insights into
structural features necessary for development of more potent
and drug-like scaffolds and compounds to inhibit apoE production.
amines. A racemic version of
a-methylbenzyl amine moiety was
the only chiral example of amine in this study which falls under
the general secondary amine category. The initial nature of the se-
lected amine dictated the hydrogen bonding capability of the final
compounds. Some of these compounds, including 1 (Chart 2), 12,
25 and 38 (Chart 3), have hydrogen-bond acceptor regions as ter-
tiary amines, whereas others are secondary amines (20, 27, 40
Acknowledgments
S.M. thanks Dr. Saeed Attar, the Chair of the Chemistry Depart-
ment, California State University Fresno and Dr. Uday Maitra, the
Chair of the Organic Chemistry Department, Indian Institute of