Y.-H. Ooi et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1051 (2013) 361–375
365
Table 2
3d (R = C14H29): Yield: 77%. Light beige precipitate. Elemental
analysis: found, C 66.82, H 7.96, N 2.49; calculated (C31H44NO3Br),
C 66.66, H 7.94, N 2.51. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2952, 2917, 2849 (CAH
aliphatic), 1713 (C@O ester), 1623 (C@N azomethine), 1285 (CAO
ester), 1245 (CAO ether).
3e (R = C16H33): Yield: 75%. Light beige precipitate. Elemental
analysis: found, C 67.51, H 8.27, N 2.41; calculated (C33H48NO3Br),
C 67.56, H 8.25, N 2.39. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2952, 2917, 2850 (CAH
aliphatic), 1714 (C@O ester), 1623 (C@N azomethine), 1287 (CAO
ester), 1246 (CAO ether).
3f (R = C18H37): Yield: 78%. Light beige precipitate. Elemental
analysis: found, C 68.44, H 8.64, N 2.26; calculated (C35H52NO3Br),
C 68.39, H 8.53, N 2.28. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2952, 2916, 2849 (CAH
aliphatic), 1714 (C@O ester), 1622 (C@N azomethine), 1286 (CAO
ester), 1245 (CAO ether).
Phase transition temperatures (°C) and the corresponding enthalpy changes for
compounds 3a-3f upon heating and cooling. The values in Italics denote the cooling
cycle.
Compound
Phase transition temperature, °C
(enthalpy change, kJ molꢀ1
)
3a (R = C8H17
)
Cr 57.9 (32.6) SmA 78.9 (4.9) I
I 74.7 (4.9) SmA 46.7 (1.7) SmC 28.6 (6.7) Cr
Cr 61.2 (29.1) SmA 75.7 (4.5) I
I 70.6 (5.0) SmA 43.1 (0.9) SmC 33.5 (23.6) Cr
Cr 71.7 (39.9) SmA 78.1 (5.0) I
I 74.0 (5.1) SmA 53.2 (39.4) Cr
Cr 78.4 (45.6) I
3b (R = C10H21
)
3c (R = C12H25
)
3d (R = C14H29
)
)
I 74.4 (4.6) SmA 62.6 (39.1) Cr
Cr 81.8 (61.7) I
3d (R = C16H33
I 70.1* SmA 68.3 (59.2) Cr
3f (R = C18H37
)
Cr 84.1 (61.1) I
I 73.6* SmA 72.7 (59.9) Cr
Note: Cr, crystal; SmA, smectic A; SmC, smectic C; I, isotropic.
*
Transition temperature determined by POM, undetected via DSC.
2.3.4. Synthesis of compounds 4a–4f
The present star-shaped compounds 4a–4f are synthesized
based on the following method with some modification from that
reported in the literature [31]. Phloroglucinol anhydrous
(2.5 mmol, 0.31 g) was dissolved in 10 mL N,N0-dimethylformam-
ide (DMF). Potassium carbonate anhydrous (50 mmol, 7.0 g) was
added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stir at 80 °C for 1 h.
Excess amount of compound 3a–3f (10 mmol) was dissolved in
50 mL hot DMF and was added to the reaction mixture followed
by a catalytic amount of potassium iodide. The reaction mixture
was stirred at 80 °C for 48 h (2 days). Once completed, it was al-
lowed to cool down and left to evaporate at room temperature un-
til the total volume of the mixture was 40 mL. Cold water was
added and the resulting precipitate was filtered off, dried and puri-
fied by column chromatography whereby dichloromethane was
used as the mobile phase. The precipitate thus obtained was
recrystallized from DMF to obtain the star-shaped compounds,
4a–4f. The elemental analytical and FT-IR data for compounds
4a–4f are summarized as follows:
4a (R = C8H17): Yield: 26%. Beige precipitate. Elemental analysis:
found, C 74.78, H 7.70, N 3.27; calculated (C81H99N3O12), C 74.45, H
7.64, N 3.22. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2955, 2920, 2851 (CAH aliphatic),
1714 (C@O ester), 1624 (C@N azomethine), 1284 (CAO ester),
1250 (CAO ether).
4b (R = C10H21): Yield: 25%. Beige precipitate. Elemental analy-
sis: found, C 75.20, H 8.02, N 3.06; calculated (C87H111N3O12), C
75.13, H 8.04, N 3.02. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2956, 2921, 2853 (CAH
aliphatic), 1713 (C@O ester), 1624 (C@N azomethine), 1281 (CAO
ester), 1250 (CAO ether).
4c (R = C12H25): Yield: 32%. Beige precipitate. Elemental analy-
sis: found, C 75.88, H 8.55, N 2.94; calculated (C93H123N3O12), C
75.73, H 8.41, N 2.85. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2956, 2919, 2851 (CAH ali-
phatic), 1714 (C@O ester), 1623 (C@N azomethine), 1281 (CAO
ester), 1249 (CAO ether).
4d (R = C14H29): Yield: 30%. Beige precipitate. Elemental analy-
sis: found, C 76.35, H 8.65, N 2.87; calculated (C99H135N3O12), C
76.26, H 8.73, N 2.70. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2956, 2920, 2850 (CAH
aliphatic), 1713 (C@O ester), 1623 (C@N azomethine), 1282 (CAO
ester), 1250 (CAO ether).
4e (R = C16H33): Yield: 36%. Beige precipitate. Elemental analy-
sis: found, C 76.83, H 8.95, N 2.63; calculated (C105H147N3O12), C
76.74, H 9.02, N 2.56. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2955, 2918, 2850 (CAH
aliphatic), 1713 (C@O ester), 1625 (C@N azomethine), 1285 (CAO
ester), 1251 (CAO ether).
4f (R = C18H37): Yield: 34%. Beige precipitate. Elemental analy-
sis: found, C 77.29, H 9.25, N 2.44; calculated (C111H159N3O12), C
77.18, H 9.28, N 2.43. IR (KBr) v/cmꢀ1: 2956, 2921, 2852 (CAH
aliphatic), 1714 (C@O ester), 1624 (C@N azomethine), 1282 (CAO
ester), 1250 (CAO ether).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Liquid crystalline behaviour of the intermediary compounds
3a–3f
The phase sequences for compounds 3a–3f with well-defined
transition temperatures are shown in Table 2. All the observed li-
quid crystalline textures are in accordance to those reported in
the literatures [32].
As seen in Table 2, all the intermediary 3a–3f are found to be
smectogenic. Compounds 3a–3c exhibit enantiotropic properties
whereby the phase sequences of crystal–mesophase–isotropic are
recorded during heating and cooling cycles. Such transitions have
also been supported by the enthalpy values of the respective com-
pounds. Hence, they are enantiotropic smectogens exhibiting the
SmA phase during heating and both SmA and SmC phases during
cooling except for 3c, which does not show the tilted SmC phase
on cooling. The SmA phase of 3a–3c is identified based on the for-
mation of batonnets which eventually coalesce to form the focal
conic fan-shaped texture when viewed under POM. On further
cooling, SmC phase is observed only in 3a and 3b whereby the focal
conic fan-shaped changes into the broken fan-shaped texture be-
fore undergoing crystallization process at lower temperature.
Fig. 2 shows the optical photomicrographs of 3a exhibiting the
focal conic fan-shaped texture of SmA phase and the broken fan-
shaped texture of SmC phase upon cooling. Whilst the DSC traces
for 3a upon heating–cooling cycle is shown in Fig. 4. Compounds
3d–3f exhibit solely monotropic SmA phase. From the DSC thermo-
grams of 3e and 3f, the I-SmA transition upon cooling is undetect-
able but under the polarized light, the SmA phase is apparent prior
to crystallization when a slower cooling rate of 1 °C minꢀ1 is
employed instead of 5 °C minꢀ1. Under this condition, the forma-
tion of tiny circular focal-conic domain (Fig. 3) is observed fol-
lowed by immediate crystallization. A noteworthy feature in
relation to the I-SmA is that it occurs very rapidly and hence is
not detectable by the DSC. Therefore, it can be suggested that the
I-SmA phase transition range has narrowed and the IACr transition
become dominant as the series ascends towards homologue with
much longer terminal alkyl chains. By referring to Table 2, the
tilted SmC phase apparently disappear starting from 3c onwards
which possess R = C12H25. In short, the SmC phase becomes not vis-
ible upon elongation of carbon chain. This can be due to the differ-
ence in the dipole distribution between the alkyl groups at both
end of the molecule which eventually reduces its ability to sustain
the tilting arrangement and attraction between the molecules.
Across the series, the melting temperatures increase which show