donors or electron acceptors), and most of these transfor-
mations can be carried out in one or two steps, which
demonstrates the usefulness of these intermediates. The
research described in this report focuses on the synthesis of
the fused-aromatic dione benzo[1,2-b:6,5-b0]dithiophene-
4,5-dione (BDTD) and its conversion to new π-conjugated
materials precursors by different synthetic approaches.
This work is a helpful contribution to the field since it
reports not only the synthesis of novel donor and acceptor
molecules based on BDTD but also a creative synthetic
approach to new molecules. This approach can be adapted
to other aromatic diones, giving access to novel donor
and acceptor molecules, which is key to generating new
π-conjugated materials with improved physical and elec-
tronic properties.
Molecules such as BDTD (shown in Scheme 1) offer
various features that make them attractive for π-conju-
gated materials. These molecules inherit the wide range of
electronic properties offered by thiophene-based materials3a
and also offer the possibility for postderivatization on the
thiophene rings (i.e., halogenation, borylation, stannyla-
tion, etc.) and on the carbonyl groups. Due to these
features, various syntheses and uses for BDTD have been
reported.3bꢀe
(Me3Si)2-BDTD was only achieved by dissolving the
(Me3Si)2-BDTD in concentrated sulfuric acid and immedi-
ate quenching with water. This approach was necessary
since the removal of the TMS groups could not be accom-
plished by the standard deprotection methods such as
using fluoride sources or dilute acids.
We report here an alternative synthetic route toward
BDTD, and this approach is presented in Scheme 2. This
synthetic path uses the inexpensive and readily available
3-bromothiophene as starting material, and it is highly
convenient, since the reaction can be carried out in only
two steps, in high yields, from inexpensive starting materi-
als, and requiring no column purification, which allows a
multigram synthesis.
The synthesis of the diketone 2, which is the key inter-
mediate, was carried out using a modified literature pro-
cedure for analogous systems.5 After 2 was isolated, it was
subjected to oxidative ring closing using iron trichloride or
iron tribromide in dichloromethane (DCM).
Scheme 2. Short Synthesis of BDTD
Initially, to make BDTD, we used the synthetic route
shown in Scheme 1. This synthetic route employs the
readily available 2-bromothiophene as the starting mate-
rial and was based on previously reported literature
procedures4 to generate the intermediate 1. Unfortunately,
this route contains a considerable number of synthetic
steps (>6), with a low overall yield (∼9%), and in some
cases requires column purification, which makes the synthe-
sis expensive and unsuitable for a large-scale synthesis of
BDTD. It is worthy to note that, as shown in the final step
in Scheme 1, the deprotection of the silyl compound
Various experiments were carried out to optimize the
oxidative ring-closing conditions in DCM, i.e. different
concentrations, reaction times, and temperatures (20, 35,
and 40 °C). Monitoring of the reaction by TLC for several
hours (1ꢀ24 h) lead to the conclusion that the reaction
must be carried out at room temperature, for at least 2 h,
and using 3 equiv or more of FeCl3 or FeBr3 to achieve
high conversion. If less than 2.5 equiv of iron chloride were
employed full reaction conversion was not observed, even
if the reaction was run for more than 24 h.
Scheme 1. Multi-step Route toward BDTD
We carried out various chemical transformations on
BDTD (Table 1). Most of these chemical transformations
are straightforward and can be done in one or two steps,
(3) (a) Skotheim, T. A., Reynolds, J. R., Eds. Conjugated Polymers:
Theory, Synthesis, Properties, and Characterization (Handbook of Con-
ducting Polymers), 3rd ed.; CRC Press LLC.: Boca Raton, FL, 2007. (b)
Wynberg, H.; Sinnige, H. J. M. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1969, 88, 1244.
(c) Letizia, J. A.; Cronin, S.; Ortiz, R. P.; Facchetti, A.; Ratner, M. A.;
Marks, T. J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 1911. (d) Mondal, R.; Becerril,
H. A.; Verploegen, E.; Kim, D.; Norton, J. E.; Ko, S.; Miyaki, N.; Lee,
S.; Toney, M. F.; Bredas, J.-L.; McGehee, M. D.; Bao, Z. J. Mater.
Chem. 2010, 20, 5823. (e) Getmanenko, Y. A.; Risko, C.; Tongwa, P.;
Kim, E.-G.; Li, H.; Sandhu, B.; Timofeeva, T.; Bredas, J.-L.; Marder,
S. R. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 76, 2660.
(4) (a) Khor, E.; Ng, S. C.; Li, H. C.; Chai, S. Heterocycles 1991, 32,
1805. (b) Nicolas, Y.; Blanchard, P.; Roncali, J.; Allain, M.; Mercier, N.;
Deman, A.-L.; Tardy, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3513. (c) Usta, H.; Lu, G.;
Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9034. (d) Hou,
J.; Chen, H.-Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
16144.
(5) Babudri, F.; Fiandanese, V.; Marchese, G.; Punzi, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 7305.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX