C (1) we decided to pursue the enantiomeric structure 5 as
the synthetic target (Scheme 1) in anticipation that the
configuration of the C(11)ÀC(23) unit of tedanolide C
should be the same as that for the key C(10)ÀC(23)
pharmacophore of 13-deoxytedanolide.
Scheme 1. Strategy for the Synthesis of the Protected
C(1)ÀC(11) Fragment of the Targeted Enantiomer of Tedanolide C
In 2010 our laboratory reported the synthesis of the
C(15)ÀC(21) fragment of 5.6 Kalesse et al. subsequently
published their synthesis of the C(14)ÀC(23) fragment of a
diastereomeric analog of tedanolide C using a Kiyooka
aldol reaction.7,8 More recently still, a synthesis of the
C(1)ÀC(12) fragment has been reported by Smith et al. by
a route involving an asymmetric hydroformylation of a
1,3-diene.9 We report herein our synthesis of 6, a protected
version of the C(1)ÀC(11) fragment of the targeted en-
antiomer of tedanolide C.
Our strategy for the synthesis of fragment 6 (Scheme 1)
involves the formation of the secondary C(7) hydroxyl
group by addition of vinyl iodide 7 to aldehyde 8. We
anticipated that the C(7) alcohol stereochemistry would be
controlled by accessing a FelkinÀAhn transition state for
the carbonyl addition.10 Aldehyde 8 was synthesized start-
ing from the known aldehyde 911 (Scheme 2). Subjection of
9 to an enantioselective Reformatsky-type reaction12 with
oxazolidinone 1013 in the presence of SnCl2 afforded 11 in
56% yield with >98:2 dr. The absolute configuration of
the hydroxyl group at C(3) of 11 was confirmed by using
the advanced Mosher ester method.14 Protection of alcohol
11 as a TBS ether using TBSOTf and 2,6-lutidine, followed
by reduction of the acyl oxazolidinone with LiBH4 and
subsequent ParishÀDoering oxidation15 of the primary
alcohol, afforded aldehyde 12.16 The syn aldol reaction
between 12 and propionyl oxazolidinone 1317 was per-
formed in the presence of TiCl4 and (À)-sparteine18 and
gratifyingly afforded aldol 14 in 76% yield as a single
diastereomer. The use of (À)-sparteine in this reaction
was essential to obtain synthetically useful diastereoselec-
tivity; the aldol reaction of the titanium enolate generated
with diisopropylethyl amine (DIPEA) as the base af-
forded a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers. Protection of the
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Aldehyde 8
(6) Barth, R.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2342.
newly formed hydroxyl group of 14 as a TMS ether,
followed by reduction of the acyl oxazolidinone with LiBH4
€
(7) Bulow, L.; Naini, A.; Fohrer, J.; Kalesse, M. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 6038.
(8) Kalesse’s synthetic target has the C(10)ÀC(23) stereochemistry,
the same as that for our target 5, but has C(1)ÀC(7) stereochemistry, the
same as that in the originally proposed structure for tedanolide C (1).
(9) Smith, T. E.; Fink, S. J.; Levine, Z. G.; McClelland, K. A.;
Zackheim, A. A.; Daub, M. E. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1452.
(10) (a) Cherest, M.; Felkin, H.; Prudent, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968,
2199. (b) Anh, N. T.; Eisenstein, O. Nouv. J. Chim. 1977, 1, 61.
(11) Oka, T.; Murai, A. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 1.
and oxidation of the primary alcohol with SO3 pyridine,15
completed this synthesis of aldehyde 8.
3
The stereochemistry of aldol 14 was verified by the
studies summarized in Scheme 3. Alcohol 15, obtained in
two steps from 14, was elaborated into diol 16 in 62% yield
by benzylation of the primary alcohol19 and deprotection
of the two silyl ethers. Analysis of the 13C NMR spectrum
of the derived acetonide 17 using Rychnovsky’s method20
confirmed the syn relationship between C(3)ÀOH and
C(5)ÀOH. Independently, acetonide 18was alsogenerated
in two steps from alcohol 15. The small HaÀHb and
HaÀHc coupling constants (J < 2 Hz) observed in the
1H NMR spectrum of 18 suggested that this compound
€
(12) (a) Kogl, M.; Brecker, L.; Warrass, R.; Mulzer, J. Angew. Chem.,
€
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 9320. (b) Kogl, M.; Brecker, L.; Warrass, R.; Mulzer, J.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2714.
(13) Kende, A. S.; Kawamura, K.; Orwat, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 5821.
(14) (a) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 512. (b)
Hoye, T. R.; Jeffrey, C. S.; Shao, F. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2451.
(15) Parikh, J. R.; von Doering, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
5505.
(16) Hartung, I. V.; Niess, B.; Haustedt, L. O.; Hoffmann, H. M. R.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3239.
(17) Evans, D. A.; Bartroli, J.; Shih, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 2127.
(18) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A.; Chaudhary, K.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 894.
(19) Brummond, K. M.; Hong, S.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 907.
(20) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Rogers, B.; Yang, G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
3511.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 1, 2013
59