Um et al.
feature for the reactivity of these compounds is that the
thionocarbonyl compounds are less reactive than their oxygen
analogues toward strongly basic amines or oxy anions.
The CdS bond in 6 is considered to be a soft electrophilic
center due to the high poarizability of S, whereas the CdO bond
in 5 is a hard electrophilic center. The primary amines used in
this study have been classified as hard bases on the basis of
their strong proton basicity.11 Thus, the hard amine bases would
not exhibit high reactivity toward the soft electrophile 6 on the
basis of the hard-soft acids and bases (HSAB) principle. Since
the hardness of amines increases with increase in their basicity,
one might expect that the rate enhancement accompanied by
increasing amine basicity is much less significant for the
reactions of the soft electrophile 6 than for those of the hard
electrophile 5. This argument can be supported by the present
kinetic results. Table 1 demonstrates that as the amine changes
from the least basic CF3CH2NH2 (pKa ) 5.70) to the most basic
C3H7NH2 (pKa ) 10.89), the kN value increases from 4.95 ×
10-3 to 61.0 M-1 s-1 for the reactions of 5 and from 3.35 ×
10-2 to 4.86 M-1 s-1 for the reactions of 6. The increase in the
C3H7NH2
CF3CH2NH2
second-order rate constant (kN
/kN
) on increasing
the amine basicity (e.g., from 5.70 to 10.89) is 1.2 × 104 for
the reaction of 5 but only 1.3 × 102 for the reactions of 6, i.e.,
ca. 2 orders of magnitude smaller.
FIGURE 1. Brønsted-type plots for the reactions of 5 (O) and 6 (b)
with primary amines in H2O containing 20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 (
0.1 °C. The numbers refer to the amines in Table 1. The solid line was
calculated by eq 3.
To get further evidence for the preceding argument that 6
would not exhibit high reactivity toward hard nucleophiles, the
second-order rate constants have been determined for the
-
reactions of 5 and 6 with OH- and N3 ions, a strongly hard
As shown in Figure 1, the Brønsted-type plot for the reaction
of 6 is also nonlinear, i.e., ânuc decreases from 0.68 to 0.11 as
the amine basicity increases. Since it has often been suggested
that the ânuc value should be larger than 0.8 for reactions that
proceed through a stepwise mechanism,15-17 one might insist
that the aminolysis of 6 does not proceed through a stepwise
mechanism, although the Brønsted-type plot is nonlinear. In fact,
Jencks and Castro et al. have attributed such a nonlinear
Brønsted-type plot to a normal Hammond effect for a concerted
reaction with an earlier transition-state for a more reactive
nucleophile.15,16
However, the above argument is inconsistent with the stability
of the tetrahedral intermediate T(. It has generally been reported
that T( is less unstable for reactions of thionocarbonyl
compounds than for those of carbonyl compounds. This has been
attributed to the weaker ability of the C-S- moiety in T( to
form a CdS bond and expel the nucleofuge, when compared
to the C-O- moiety, due to a weaker π-bonding energy of
the thionocarbonyl group relative to the carbonyl group.8 This
argument implies that the lifetime of the tetrahedral intermediate
T( is longer for the reactions of 6 than for those of 5. Thus, the
curved Brønsted-type plot obtained for the aminolysis of 6 can
be interpreted as a change in the RDS, although ânuc is smaller
than 0.8.
base and a borderline one, respectively. As shown in Table 1,
the second-order rate constants for the reactions of OH- ion
with 5 and 6 are 160 and 5.14 M-1 s-1, respectively, whereas
-
those for the reactions of N3 ion with 5 and 6 are 0.258 and
6.78 M-1 s-1, respectively. It is noted that 6 is ca. 30 times
less reactive than 5 toward the hard base OH- ion but ca. 25
times more reactive toward the borderline base N3- ion. More
-
interestingly, N3 is more reactive than the strongly basic
propylamine and OH- in the reaction with 6, although N3 is
-
over 6 and 11 pKa units less basic than propylamine and OH-,
respectively. It follows from the evidence presented here that
the weak interaction between the soft electrophile and the hard
amine nucleophiles might be a plausible cause for the current
result that 6 exhibits lower reactivity than 5 in the reaction with
highly basic amines.
Effect of Replacing CdO by CdS on Mechanism. The
effect of amine basicity on the second-order rate constant kN is
illustrated in Figure 1. The Brønsted-type plot for the reaction
of 5 exhibits a downward curvature, i.e., ânuc decreases from
0.99 to 0.27 as the amine basicity increases. Such a nonlinear
Brønsted-type plot is typical for aminolyses of esters with a
good leaving group and has been interpreted as a change in the
rate-determining step (RDS) of stepwise reactions, i.e., from
breakdown of T( (the k2 step) to its formation (the k1 step) as
the amine basicity increases.1,12-14 Thus, one can suggest that
the current aminolysis of 5 proceeds through T( with a change
in the RDS.
(14) (a) Um, I. H.; Hong, J. Y.; Seok, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
1438-1444. (b) Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Lee, H. W.; Nagano, Y.; Fujio, M.;
Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4980-4987. (c) Um, I. H.; Kim, K. H.;
Park, H. R.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3937-3942. (d)
Um, I. H.; Chun, S. M.; Chae, O. M.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 3166-3172. (e) Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Kim, H. T.; Bae, S. K. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2436-2441.
(15) Song, B. D.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8479-
8484. (b) Hammond, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 334-338.
(16) (a) Castro, E. A.; Aguayo, R.; Besselo, J.; Santos, J. G. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 7788-7791. (b) Castro, E. A.; Santos, J. G.; Tellez, J.;
Umana, M. I. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6568-6574.
(17) Oh, H. K.; Ku, M. H.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
8995-8998.
(11) (a) Lowry, T. H.; Richardson, K. S. Mechanism and Theory in
Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed; Harper: New York, 1987; pp 318-320. (b)
Pearson, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3533-3539.
(12) (a) Jencks, W. P. Chem. ReV. 1985, 85, 511-527. (b) Page, M. I.;
Williams, A. Organic and Bio-organic Mechanisms; Longman: Harlow,
U.K. 1997; Chapter 7.
(13) (a) Lee, I.; Sung, D. D. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 557-567. (b)
Oh, H. K.; Lee, J. M.; Sung, D. D.; Lee, I. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004,
25, 557-559.
2304 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 6, 2006