1 would lead to the precursor, cyclohexylcarbaldehyde 2,
which could be efficiently prepared via a domino organo-
catalyzed double Michael reaction11 of the suitable nitro
alkenoate 3 and R,β-unsaturated aldehyde 4 (Scheme 1).
We report herein the development of a one-pot organoca-
talytic enantioselective domino double-Michael reaction
and PictetÀSpenglerÀlactamization reaction sequence
leading to dodecahydrobenz[a]indolo[3,2-h]quinolizines
in good yields and excellent diastereoselectivities and en-
antioselectivities (up to >99% ee).
with >99% ee for the reaction in CH2Cl2 (Table 1, entries
9À15 and entry 10). The reactions in 99% EtOH or CH3CN
gave slightly lower diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entries 12
and 14). Reactions performed with catalysts IV and other
additives were not promising and provided lower yields
(Table 1, entries 16À20).
The PictetÀSpengler reaction and lactamization was
achieved by the reaction of 5a, isolated from the reaction
depicted in Table 1, and 1.5 equiv of 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-
ethanamine (6a) with 1.4 equiv of trifluoroacetic acid
(TFA) in refluxing toluene for 1 h to give 73% yield of
7a. Notably, the domino reaction sequence, the double-
Michael, and the PictetÀSpengler reactions could be
achieved in one pot without the need to isolate the double
Michael adducts 5a. The one-pot reaction strategy was
achieved via the addition of toluene in the reaction mix-
tures after the completion of double Michael reaction in
CH2Cl2, followed by treatment with 6a and TFA, to
provide 77% yield of 7a with >99% ee. In addition, the
one-pot process provided a slightly better yield than that
obtained with the isolation of 5a and the resubmission
sequence of the PictetÀSpenglerÀlactamization reaction
(Table 2, entry 1). With the optimized conditions in hand, the
one-pot domino-reaction protocol was applied in the reaction
with various R,β-unsaturated aldehydes 4, and the results
were promising and general with high yields and stereoselec-
tivities (Table 2). Usually, the reaction was completed in 2
days, but a much longer reaction time was required in the case
with 4h bearing the ortho-substituent. The steric bulkiness so
close to the conjugate addition center may encumber the
reactions (Table 2, entry 8). The structures of the adducts
were assigned on the basis of the X-ray analysis of a single
crystal of (À)-7a (Figure 1).12 In particular, the absolute
configurations of the products were unambiguously deter-
mined by the X-ray analysis of (À)-7c (Figure 2).13
Table 2. Scope of Organocatalytic Double-MichaelÀPictetÀ
Spengler Reactionsa
entry
R1
R2
timeb (h) yieldc,d (%) eee (%)
1
2
7a, C6H5
H
34
36
25
36
26
36
31
168
25
44
38
77
82
83
62
77
82
84
76
83
65
86
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
7b, 4-FC6H4
7c, 4-ClC6H4
7d, 4-BrC6H4
7e, 4-NO2C6H4
7f, 4-MeOC6H4
7g, 4-NMe2C6H4
7h, 2-MeC6H4
7i, 4-MeC6H4
7j, 2-furyl
H
3
H
4
H
5
H
6
H
7
H
8
H
9
H
10
11
H
7k, C6H5
OMe
a Unless otherwise noted, the reactions were performed on a 0.2 mmol
scale of 3 and 4, in a ratio of 1:1.2, using 20 mol % of the catalyst IV and
DABCO at room temperature in a vial containing the appropriate solvent.
b Time required for 1stÀdouble Michael reaction. c Isolated yield of 7.
d Diastereomeric ratio >20:1, determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction
mixture. e The ee of 7, determined by HPLC with Chiralpak IA.
Initially, the double Michael reaction of nitroalkenoate
3 and cinnamaldehyde 4a was performed with pyrrolidine
(I)ÀDABCO in CHCl3 at ambient temperature for 7 h and
provided the cyclohexylcarbaldehyde 5a in 84% yield
(Table 1, entry 1). After the reactions were screened with
other catalysts, e.g., IIÀVIII, the best result was obtained
with the condition of IVÀDABCO for 44 h reaction to give
83% yield of 5a with >99% ee (Table 1, entry 4). The
reactions with other catalysts afforded much lower yield,
or there was no observation of product 5a (Table 1, entries
1À8). Further optimization of the double-Michael reac-
tion with IVÀDABCO in various solvents was conducted,
and the optimal yield of 5a was obtained in 89% yield
Figure 2. Stereoplots of the X-ray crystal structures of (À)-7a
and (À)-7c: C, gray; O, red; N, blue; Cl, green.
(12) X-ray crystal structure analysis of (À)-7a: C25H25N3O3, weight
415.48 g molÀ1, colorless crystal. CCDC-909086 contains the supple-
mentary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained
free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
(13) X-ray crystal structure analysis of (À)-7c: C25H24ClN3O3,
weight 449.92 g molÀ1, colorless crystal. CCDC-909087 contains the
supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be
obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
(11) For recent examples, see: (a) Varga, S.; Jakab, G.; Drahos, L.;
ꢀ
Holczbauer, T.; Czugler, M.; Soos, T. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5416–5419. (b)
Wang, L.-L.; Peng, L.; Bai, J.-F.; Jia, L.-N.; Luo, X.-Y.; Huang, Q.-C.;
Xu, X.-Y.; Wang, L.-X. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5593–5595. (c) Ma,
A.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3634–3637. (d) Zhao, G.-L.; Ibrahem, I.;
ꢀ
Dziedzic, P.; Sun, J.; Bonneau, C.; Cordova, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14,
€
10007–10011. (e) Enders, D.; Huttl, M. R. M.; Grondal, C.; Raabe, G.
Nature 2006, 441, 861–863.
470
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013