Table 1. Reaction Optimization Using 1a as a Substrate
Scheme 1. Base-Promoted Homolytic Aromatic Substitution
temp
tBuOOH
initiator
(mol %)
yielda
(%)
entry
(°C)
(equiv)
1
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
50
120
2.0 (aq)
1.0 (aq)
0.1 (aq)
2.2 (aq)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
2.2 (dec)
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
19ꢀ31b
21
2
3
4
4
41
5
31ꢀ63b
6
FeCp2 (0.5)
66
However, in all these examples a prefunctionalized
radical precursor (mostly an aryl iodide) has to be chosen
as starting material. Herein we present intramolecular
BHAS of various biphenyl-2-carboxaldehydes which pro-
ceed via acyl radicals8 to give the corresponding fluorenones
representing a radical cross dehydrogenative C(sp2)ꢀC(sp2)
bond forming process.9,10 In contrast to the known BHAS
processes, a halide as a radical leaving group and an external
strong base are not necessary thereby improving the
economy of the overall transformation.
7
FeCl2 (0.5)
62
8
Fe(OAc)2 (0.5)
FeSO4 (0.5)
73
9
60
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CuI (0.5)
26
Pd(OAc)2 (0.5)
Bu4NI (0.5)
22
64
FeCp2 (0.1)
60ꢀ72b
FeCp2 (0.1)
73c
tBuONNOtBu (10)
tBuONNOtBu (10)
tBuOOtBu (100)
52
17
traces
As a substrate for optimization studies we chose
biphenyl-2-carboxyaldehyde 1a. The tert-butoxyl radical
is known to efficiently abstract the hydrogen atom of the
carbonyl in aldehydes, and the commercially available
tBuOOH is readily reduced by SET to the tert-butoxyl
radical and the basic hydroxide anion. Hence, this cheap
reagent should be well suited to act as a reagent for the
planned BHAS reactions. We tested radical CDC of 1a
to give fluorenone (2a) with tBuOOH (aq) as the oxidant
(Table 1).
a Determined by 1H NMR using an internal standard. b Difficult to
reproduce, yields in the range given were obtained. c tBuOOH added in
two batches (aq = aqueous, dec = decane: used as a 5.5 M sol. in dec.).
initiation step which is probably mediated with traces of
TMs.11 We therefore tested the reaction in the presence of
a small amounts of TMs and found that FeCp2 performs
well (entry 6). Good results were achieved with 0.1 mol %
of FeCp2 (72%, entry 13); however yields varied. Upon
adding tBuOOH in two batches a reproducible 73% yield
was obtained (entry 14). Increasing (53% with 1 mol %
FeCp2 under otherwise identical conditions) or decreasing
(∼55%NMR yield with0.02mol % of FeCp2) theinitiator
loading gave worse results, and other Fe(II)-salts also
gave good yields (entries 7ꢀ9). A good yield was achieved
with Fe(OAc)2; however, due to the low solubility of the
acetate in CH3CN, this result was difficult to reproduce.
Therefore, the FeCp2-initiator was regarded as the best
Fe-derivative among this series. CuI or Pd(OAc)2 provided
loweryields(entries10, 11). Agoodresultwasalsoachieved
by using 0.5 mol % of Bu4NI which is well-known to
mediate radical reactions in the presence of tBuOOH
(entry 12).12 tBuONNOtBu could also be used to initiate
this reaction. However, as compared to FeCp2 a signifi-
cantly higher initiator loading had to be used (entry 15),
and at lower temperature the chain was not efficient
(entry 16). With tBuOOtBu in the absence of tBuOOH,
only trace amounts of product were formed (entry 17).
Finally, MeCN was found to be the best suited solvent
as compared to other solvents such as tetrahydrofuran,
dichloroethane, dimethylacetamide, or benzotrifluoride.
In the absence of an external radical initiator with
2.2 equiv of tBuOOH at 90 °C, we obtained 2a in 41%
yield (entry 4). Reducing the amount of tBuOOH led to
lower yields (entries 1ꢀ3).
The yield was higher with nonaqueous tBuOOH; how-
ever, we faced difficulties in reproducing results, and yields
varied between 31 and 63% (entry 5). This is due to the
(8) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Crich, D.; Komatsu, M.; Ryu, I. Chem. Rev.
1999, 99, 1991–2069.
(9) TM-catalyzed CꢀH activation for preparation of fluorenones,
see: (a) Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5616–5620.
(b) Zhao, J.; Yue, D.; Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 5288–5295. (c) Thirunavukkarasu, V. S.; Cheng, C.-H.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14723–14726. (d) Liu, T.-P.; Liao, Y.-X.;
Xing, C.-H.; Hu, Q.-S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2452–2455. (e) Lockner,
J. W.; Dixon, D. D.; Risgaard, R.; Baran, P. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5628–
5631. (f) Seo, S.; Slater, M.; Greaney, M. F. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2650–
2653. (g) Gandeepan, P.; Hung, C.-H.; Cheng, C.-H. Chem. Commun.
2012, 48, 9379–9381.
(10) TM-free fluorenone synthesis: (a) Denney, D. B.; Klemchuk,
P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3289–3290. (b) Barluenga, J.; Trincado,
ꢀ
M.; Rubio, E.; Gonzalez, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3140–
3143. (c) Shi, Z.; Glorius, F. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 829–833. (d) Matcha, K.;
Antonchick, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, early view, DOI:
10.1002/anie.201208851.
(11) A similar initiation and chain propagation step was recently
suggested for a radical arene trifluoromethylation: Ji, Y.; Brueckl, T.;
Baxter, R. D.; Fujiwara, Y.; Seiple, I. B.; Su, S.; Blackmond, D. G.;
Baran, P. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 14411–14415.
(12) (a) Uyanik, M.; Okamoto, H.; Yasui, T.; Ishihara, K. Science
2010, 328, 1376–1379. (b) Liu, Z. J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, S. L.; Shi, E.; Xu,
Y.; Wan, X. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3231–3235.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 2013
929