Xie et al.
tion. As the toluene solution contains some 50 odd
PCAHs, some of which are in trace amounts and/or high
molecular weight with limited solubility in various
solvents, it is a challenge to perform analysis, isolation,
and identification. For this, high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) coupled with ultraviolet spec-
troscopy (UV) and/or mass spectrometry (MS) is a power-
ful and efficient tool at the present stage.13 This research
group, over many years’ experiences dealing with allied
reactions and related PCAHs, has established efficient
methods and know-hows in these separation techniques.
Detailed HPLC-UV/MS procedures for the separation
and identification of the present PCAH series were
described in the Ph.D. thesis of Y.P.;14 the method was
developed on the basis of the principle and practice in
dealing with other PCAH series.15 The toluene solution
was investigated with this analytical system to give an
HPLC chromatogram as shown in Figure S1 (see the
Supporting Information). It must be understood that
peak heights (or areas) are good indicators of abundance,
but are not strictly proportional to the concentrations,
i.e., corresponding yields. Those well-defined chromato-
graphic peaks were examined with HPLC-UV and/or
HPLC-MS; the latter MS spectra generally gave distinct
molecular ion peaks whose chlorine isotope distribution
pattern16 was utilized to judge the number of chlorine
and, in turn, to compute the molecular formula. Among
the structures of the products, perchlorobenzene 1,17
perchloronaphthalene 2,18 perchlorobiphenyl 3,19 perchlo-
ropyrene 4,20 and perchlorofluoranthene 521 (see Figure
1) have been previously characterized. In the present
experiment, they were readily identified by co-injection
HPLC and confirmed when isolated (vide infra) by direct
spectral comparisons with authentic samples available
in our group. For the mechanistic studies, early stage
intermediates must be identified to provide a reaction
pattern, i.e., major peaks of PCAHs with the MW range
500-700 should be identified. Larger molecules of MW
>700 were produced in low yields and, together with
their solubility problems, not amenable to isolation.
The crude product from the toluene solution was
sublimed at 120-160 °C and then up to 200 °C to remove
mostly 1, but in the latter range, in addition small
amounts of 2-5. HPLC-MS and co-injection with au-
thentic samples were used to identify these PCAHs. The
remaining solid was chromatographed repeatedly on a
neutral alumina column using cyclohexane as the eluent
to afford pure samples of 2-4 and 1,2,3,4,4b,4c,6,7,8,9,-
9b,9c-dodecachloro-4b,4c,9b,9c-tetrahydrocyclobuta[1,2-
a;3,4-a′]diindene-5,10-dione C18Cl12O2 (9),22 6-(p-tolyl)-6H-
1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,11-decachlorobenzo[cd]pyrene C26Cl10H8
(10),23 and 6-(p-tolyl)-6H-1,11-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10-
octachlorobenzo[cd]pyrene C26Cl8H10O2 (11) as shown in
Figure 1. An ethylbenzene soluble extract was also
chromatographed in the similar way to afford perchlo-
rocoronene (C24Cl12, 6),24 and perchlorobenzo[f]indenone
C13Cl8O (7), and 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9-octachlorocyclopenta[def]-
phenanthren-4-one C15Cl8O (8).25
Repeated column chromatography caused much loss
of materials in each run due to irreversible adsorption
and band overlaps and demanded a large outlay of time
and solvents for good separations. To circumvent these
drawbacks, a combined column and HPLC process was
also developed as an alternative. That is, an ethylbenzene
extractive was chromatographed on an alumina column
but eluted with toluene to give four blocks of mixtures.
The first fraction was recrystallized many times to give
perchlorofluoranthene 5. The last two fractions were
worked up by preparative HPLC; 6H-1,2,4,5,7,8,9,10,11-
nonachlorobenzo[cd]pyrene-3-one C19Cl9HO (12) was ob-
tained from the third fraction. In addition, three higher
molecular weight PCAHs, among others, were also
obtained in milligram scales just enough to record their
MS, infrared (IR), and/or UV spectra; this group included
C25Cl10O2 and two isomers of C26Cl7H5O and was not
investigated further.
The MS, UV, and IR spectra of these PCAHs were
recorded. X-ray crystallography was employed to identify
the structures of 5, 6, and 8-12; details of the X-ray
structure of 8-10 have been reported.22,23,25 However,
1
owing to availability and solubility of these PCAHs, H
and 13C NMR spectra were successfully obtained only
with 10, which was isolated in the largest amount. These
physical parameters are discussed in conjunction with
X-ray structures below. It should be noted that owing to
tedious and inefficient isolation procedures, product
yields could not be evaluated with reliability; some
isolated weights are given in the Experimental Section.
On the basis of the isolations, 10-12 were major and 5-9
minor products; the major products added up to a 6%
yield (75 mg) on the basis of individual calculations.
X-ray Structures and Properties. Owing to the
large steric volume of chlorine atoms, these PCAHs have
degrees of molecular strains that cause skeletal distor-
tions, which should greatly affect their physical proper-
ties. Thus detailed molecular shapes by X-ray crystal-
lography were obtained wherever good grade crystals
could be obtained. As a detailed description requires a
large space, in this paper only relevant structures and
parameters will be given to facilitate discussion. The
X-ray structures of both 5 and 6 are in record, the former
was analyzed again as (C16Cl10)2/CS2, the crystal obtained
in recrystallization from carbon disulfide (see Figure S2
in the Supporting Information). Both structures show
(13) Niessen, W. M. A. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry;
M. Dekker: New York, 1999.
(14) Peng, Y. Ph.D. Thesis, Xiamen University, Xiamen, June 2003.
(15) (a) Xie, S. Y.; Deng, S. L.; Huang, R. B.; Zheng, L. S. J.
Chromatogr. A 2001, 932, 43-53. (b) Peng, Y.; Xie, S. Y.; Chen, M.;
Feng, Y. Q.; Yu, L. J.; Huang, R. B.; Zheng, L. S. J. Chromatogr. A
2003, 1016, 61-69.
(16) Silverstein, R. M.; Bassler, G. C.; Morrill, T. C. Spectroscopic
Identification of Organic Compounds; John Wiley: New York, 1995.
(17) Brown, G. M.; Strydom, O. A. W. Acta Crystallogr. B 1974, 30,
801-804.
(18) (a) Gafner, G.; Herbstein, F. H. Nature 1963, 200, 130-132.
(b) Grasselliet, J. G.; Ritchey, W. M. Atlas of Spectral Data and
Physical Constants for Organic Com-pounds, 2nd ed.; CRC Press:
Cleveland, 1975; Vol. 3, pp 645-646.
(19) Pedersen, B. F. Acta Crystallogr. B 1975, 31, 2931-2933.
(20) Hazell, A. C.; Jagner, S. Acta Crystallogr. B 1976, 32, 682-
686.
(21) (a) Ballester, M.; Castaner, J.; Riera, J.; Pares, J. An. Quim. C
1980, 76, 157-170. (b) Xie, S. Y.; Huang, R. B.; Chen, L. H.; Huang,
W. J.; Zheng, L. S. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2045-2046.
(22) Peng, Y.; Xie, S. Y.; Long, L. S.; Huang, R. B.; Zheng, L. S. Acta
Crystallogr. E 2004, 60, o763-764.
(23) Peng, Y.; Xie, S. Y.; Huang, R. B.; Zheng, L. S. Acta Crystallogr.
E 2001, 57, o617-618.
(24) Baird, T.; Gall, J. H.; MacNicol, D. D.; Mallinson, P. R.; Michie,
C. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 1471-1473.
(25) Peng, Y.; Xie, S. Y.; Deng, S. L.; Huang, R. B.; Zheng, L. S.
Acta Crystallogr. E 2004, 60, 899-900.
1402 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 4, 2005