asymmetric oxa-Michael/aza-Henry cascade reaction of
salicylaldimines with nitroalkenes.3d Despite a few suc-
cesses, the development of efficient new cascade reactions
or catalytic systems is still highly desirable.
In recent years, the emerging field of organocatalytic
cascade reactions has attracted considerable attention, and
great progress has been made.4 Organocatalysts for cas-
cade reactions mainly include proline and its derivatives,
cinchona alkaloid-based primary amines, thioureas, and
phosphoric acids. Squaramides are a class of good hydro-
gen-bonding organocatalysts and have been increasingly
utilized in organocatalysis.5,6 Nevertheless, they are still
rarely employed in cascade reactions.7 Recently, our group
also reported some asymmetric Michael addition reactions
catalyzed by squaramides.8 In addition, a large number of
methods on asymmetric Michael addition of nitroalkenes
have been reported.9 Herein, we document an efficient
squaramide-catalyzed asymmetric cascade sulfa-Michael/
Michael addition of thiosalicylates with nitroalkene
enoates for the construction of highly functionalized chro-
mans containing three contiguous stereocenters.
Figure 1. Squaramide catalysts.
12 h. Pleasingly, the asymmetric cascade sulfa-Michael/Michael
addition proceeded smoothly to afford the desired chroman
3aa in 83% yield with good diastereoselectivity and enantio-
selectivity (88:12 dr and 87% ee) (Table1, entry 1). How-
ever, the sulfa-Michael adduct 4aa was also obtained in
10% yield. After trials, temperature was found to benefit the
cascade reaction. The reaction was complete at 40 °C in 4 h
and only afforded the corresponding chroman 3aa in
excellent yield with almost the same good diastereoselec-
tivity and enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 2). Encouraged
by the initial result, we then investigated the effect of solvent
and temperature for the optimal reaction conditions. The
results are presented in Table 1.The solvent optimization
disclosed that MeCN was the best reaction medium
(Table 1, entry 6). Variation of the solvents had little effect
on the reaction. The solvents such as ClCH2CH2Cl, CHCl3,
and toluene gave the comparable results as CH2Cl2, and the
solvents THF and i-PrOH provided lower enantioselectiv-
ities (78% ee and 73% ee, respectively) (Table 1, entries
3À5, 7, and 8). When reactions were performed at higher
temperature (60 or 80 °C), high diastereoselectivity and
enantioselectivity were maintained (Table 1, entries 9 and
10). Finally, we chose 60 °C as the optimal reaction
temperature.
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we screened
a small library of squaramide catalysts IÀX (Figure 1). The
results are summarized in Table 2. Squaramide II with 4-CF3
on the aromatic ring gave slightly lower diastereoselectivity
and enantioselectivity (88:12 dr, 86% ee) (Table 2, entry 2).
Squaramides III and IV derived from quinidine afforded the
desired adducts with similar results, but with opposite con-
figuration (Table 2, entries 3 and 4). We then turned our
attention to these squaramides VÀIX derived from chiral
1,2-diaminocyclohexane (Table 2, entries 5À9). Among
them, squaramides VII and IX gave higher diastereoselec-
tivity and enantioselectivity, but squaramide IX provided the
adduct 3aa in lower yield because of the formation of sulfa-
Michael adduct 4aa. C2-symmetric quinine-derived squar-
amide X were also examined, and lower diastereoselectivity
and enantioselectivity was obtained (Table 2, entry 10).
Therefore, squaramide VII was selected as the best catalyst.
Subsequently, the effect of catalyst loading was investigated.
The catalyst loading affected reaction rate, but rarely did the
We commenced our study with methyl thiosalicylate 1a
and nitroalkene enoate 2a as the model substrates. The model
reaction was performed in the presence of 5 mol % of
squaramide catalyst I (Figure 1) in CH2Cl2 at 15 °C for
(4) For reviews of organocatalytic cascade reactions, see: (a) Enders,
D.; Grondal, C.; Huttl, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1570.
(b) Yu, X.; Wang, W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2037. (c) Alba, A.-N.;
Companyo, X.; Viciano, M.; Rios, R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009, 13, 1432.
(d) Grondal, C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders, D. Nature Chem. 2010, 2, 167.
(e) Pellissier, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 237.
(5) For reviews of squaramides, see: (a) Storer, R. I.; Aciro, C.; Jones,
ꢀ
L. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2330. (b) Aleman, J.; Parra, A.; Jiang,
H.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6890.
(6) For selected examples of asymmetric reactions using squara-
mides, see: (a) Malerich, J. P.; Hagihara, K.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 14416. (b) Zhu, Y.; Malerich, J. P.; Rawal, V. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 153. (c) Xu, D. Q.; Wang, Y.-F.; Zhang, W.;
Luo, S.-P.; Zhong, A.-G.; Xia, A.-B.; Xu, Z.-Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16,
4177. (d) Qian, Y.; Ma, G.; Lv, A.; Zhu, H.-L.; Zhao, J.; Rawal, V. H.
Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3004. (e) Konishi, H.; Lam, T. Y.; Malerich,
J. P.; Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2028. (f) Pansare, S. V.; Paul,
E. K. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1027. (g) Min, C.; Han, X.; Liao, Z. Q.;
Wu, X. F.; Zhou, H.-B.; Dong, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 2715.
(h) Bae, H. Y.; Some, S.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, J.-Y.; Song, M. J.; Lee, S.;
Zhang, Y. J.; Song, C. E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 3196. (i) Wang,
C.; Yang, X.; Loh, C. C. J.; Raabe, G.; Enders, D. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012,
18, 11531. (j) Noole, A.; Jaerving, I.; Werner, F.; Lopp, M.; Malkov, A.;
Kanger, T. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4922.
(7) For examples of squaramide-catalyzed asymmetric cascade reac-
tions, see: (a) Wang, X.; Yao, W.; Yao, Z.; Ma, C. J. Org. Chem. 2012,
77, 2959. (b) Ling, J.-B.; Su, Y.; Zhu, H.-L.; Wang, G.-Y.; Xu, P.-F. Org.
Lett. 2012, 14, 1090. (c) Sun, W.; Zhu, G.; Wu, C.; Hong, L.; Wang, R.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 6737. (d) Duan, S.-W.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Zou,
Y.-Q.; Shi, D.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5160.
(8) (a) Yang, W.; Du, D.-M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5450. (b) Yang, W.;
Du, D.-M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1241. (c) Yang, W.; Du, D.-M.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12706. (d) Yang, W.; Jia, Y.; Du, D.-M. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 332. (e) Yang, W.; Du, D.-M. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2012, 10, 6876. (f) Yang, W.; Wang, J. S.; Du, D.-M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2012, 23, 972.
ꢀ
(9) For reviews, see: (a) Almas-i, D.; Alonso, D. A.; Najera, C.
€
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 299. (b) Enders, D.; Luttgen, K.;
Narine, A. A. Synthesis 2007, 959. Some recent examples: (c) Ding, M.;
Zhou, F.; Liu, Y.-L.; Wang, C.-H.; Zhao, X.-L.; Zhou, J. Chem. Sci.
2011, 2, 2035. (d) Dong, X.-Q.; Fang, X.; Wang, C.-J. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 4426. (e) Pei, Q.-L.; Sun, H.-W.; Wu, Z.-J.; Du, X.-L.; Zhang, X.-M.;
Yuan, W.-C. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 7849. (f) Ding, M.; Zhou, F.; Qian,
Z.-Q.; Zhou, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 2912. (g) Hui, Y.; Jiang, J.;
Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Cai, Y.; Lin, L.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4290.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 6, 2013
1191