A series of furans could be obtained in good to excellent
yields from different 1,3-diketones. Compared with un-
symmetrical 1,3-carbonyls, the symmetrical ones provided
higher furan yields. When the cyclohexane-1,3-dione was
used under standard conditions, 2-phenyl-6,7-dihydroben-
zofuran-4(5H)-one (3ab) was obtained in excellent yield.
Moreover, the 5-methyl- or 5-dimethyl-substituted cyclo-
hexane-1,3-diones were also incorporated, delivering the
corresponding furans regioselectively (3ac and 3ad). In an
expansion of the substrates, β-keto esters 2e and 2f were
used in the reaction with 2-methoxyvinylbenzene (1a), and
the corresponding products 3ae and 3af could be obtained
successfully in high yields and consistent chemoselectivity.
Notably, when both R1 and FG were aryl groups, the
target furans were provided as isomers in lower yields
(3ag). The 1,3-dicarbonyl compound bearing an amide
group was also reacted with 1a and afforded the furan
product 3ah in 10% yield. Unfortunately, 2-bromo-1-
phenylethanone was not a suitable substrate for the reac-
tion under the current conditions (3ai).
Table 3. Scope of β-Methoxystyrenesa
Next, a variety of methoxystyrene compounds were
evaluated in this Pd-catalyzed, oxidative cyclization reac-
tion (Table 3). Both electron-donating and -withdrawing
groups could be tolerated on the aromatic moieties to access
the 2,3,5-trisubstituted furans, including alkyl (3baꢀ3da,
3ha, and 3la), alkoxyl (3ea, 3fa), halogen (3iaꢀ3ka), amine
(3ga), and aromatic (3ma) groups. 1-Methyl-, 1-ethyl-, and
1-tert-butyl-substituted (2-methoxyvinyl)benzenes under-
went cyclization preferentially at the less hindered position
to afford the corresponding furans with a single regioisomer
in excellent yields (87%, 82%, and 82% respectively). Sub-
stituents at the meta positions of 2-methoxyvinyl-derived
moieties (1gꢀ1i) were tolerated, delivering good yields of the
corresponding furans (3gaꢀ3ia). Impressively, in the case
of 3-(2-methoxyvinyl)aniline (1g), 78% of the carboether-
ification product, 1-(5-(3-aminophenyl)-2-methylfuran-3-yl)-
ethanone (3ga), was isolated, which clearly demonstrated that
a meta substitution effect caused by the NH2ꢀ group also
existed in the present transformation. A similar reactivity
trend for 5-(biphenyl-4-yl)-2-methyl-3-acetate-furan (3ma)
a The reaction was carried out with 0.3 mmol of 2-methoxyvinylben-
zene and 1.2 equiv of acetyl acetone in DCE (0.5 mL) at 75 °C in 1 atm O2
balloon for 18 h. b The reaction was performed at 60 °C.
was observed during our investigations on the usage of
4-phenylmethoxystyrene. When 4-fluoro-methoxylstyrene
was employed, 5-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-methyl-3-acetate-fur-
an (3ja) was obtained with excellent yield and exclusive
regioselectivity. For example, substrates bearing an elec-
tron-rich substituent all gave good conversions and che-
moselectivity (3ea and 3fa). Generally, compared with
halogen substituents, the electron-rich groups on the aro-
matic ring improved this procedure (3baꢀ3fa, 3gaꢀ3ha,
and 3la), favoring the chemoselectivity of the products
(3iaꢀ3ka). This might reveal that the electronic nature of
the substituents on the phenyl ring has a pronounced effect
on the overall efficiency of the process.
Notably, polysubstituted furans could also be acquired
via oxidative CꢀC/CꢀO formations under this catalytic
system. To further investigate the property of the methoxyl
group of methoxystyrene, several experiments were con-
ducted under the standard conditions with alternative
substrates instead of 2-methoxyvinylbenzene (Scheme 1).
Interestingly, 1-chloro-2-(2-methoxyvinyl)benzene which
possessed the ortho site gave the other regioselective
carboetherification product 3na in lower yields, which
might be due to the steric hindrance. Note that when ethyl
acetoacetate was used instead of acetylacetone, the same
positionedsubstitutedfuran3nf wasobtainedingoodyield
(eq 1 in Scheme 1). Neither buta-1,3-dienylbenzene13 nor
styrene could carry out the carboetherification effectively
(eq 2 in Scheme 1). Furthermore, although the styrenyl
(11) (a) Keay, B. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 209–215. (b) Balme, G.;
Bouyssi, D.; Monteiro, N. Heterocycles 2007, 73, 87–124. (c) Brown,
R. C. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 850–852. (d) Cacchi, S.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 42–64. (e) Donohoe, T. J.; Bower, J. F.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 3373–3376. (f) Duan, X. H.; Liu,
X. Y.; Guo, L. N.; Liao, M. C.; Liu, W. M.; Liang, Y. M. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 6980–6983. (g) Jung, C. K.; Wang, J. C.; Krische, M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4118–4119. (h) Lenden, P.; Entwistle, D. A.;
Willis, M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10657–10660. (i) Ma,
S. M.; Zhang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12386–12387. (j) Marshall,
J. A.; Bartley, G. S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7169–7171. (k) Sromek,
A. W.; Kel’in, A. V.; Gevorgyan, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
2280–2282. (l) Wong, H. N. C. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 335–344.
(m) Zhang, M.; Jiang, H.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M.; Dixneuf, P. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1681–1684.
(12) (a) Cao, H.; Jiang, H.; Mai, R.; Zhu, S.; Qi, C. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2010, 352, 143–152. (b) Cao, H.; Jiang, H.; Yao, W.; Liu, X. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 1931–1933. (c) Cao, H.; Jiang, H.; Yuan, G.; Chen, Z.; Qi, C.;
Huang, H. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 10553–10559. (d) Jiang, H.; Yao,
W.; Cao, H.; Huang, H.; Cao, D. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5347–5350. (e)
Zhang, M.; Jiang, H.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M.; Dixneuf, P. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1681–1684.
(13) (a) Liao, L.; Jana, R.; Urkalan, K. b.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5784–5787. (b) Liao, L.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10209–10211.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C