However, despite the differences three arteries regularly appear in the descriptions of most studies [2, 7, 11, 12, 13, 17, 20].
Firstly, a left hepatic a. arising from the left gastric a., running in the pars condensa of the lesser omentum and reaching the
liver in the left part of the porta hepatis. Secondly, a middle (or common) hepatic a. arising from the celiac trunk, aorta or
SMA, running in the pars vasculosa of the lesser omentum anterior to the portal v. It gives two terminal branches, the
gastroduodenal and proper hepatic aa. the latter usually dividing into two terminal branches as it enters the liver [1]. Finally,
a right hepatic a. arising from the SMA running behind the pancreas and duodenum, passing behind or to the right of the
portal v., becoming anterior again near the porta hepatis.
The previous conclusions that have been drawn tend to be based on the findings of Tandler [20 ] and Vincens [23 ] on the
origins of the arteries of the digestive system. According to Tandler [20], these arteries are derived from the rearrangement of
segmental arteries arising from the anterior aspect of the aorta that are united via a ventral longitudinal anastomosis. All three
previously mentioned hepatic aa. are, according to Tandler [20 ], the main arteries supplying the liver. After a series of
regressions and obliterations, only a single artery remains, usually the middle artery, however two or three of the arteries may
persist.
This mechanism does not, however account for all variants described in the literature. Vincens [23], therefore suggested a
slightly more elaborate model according to which the liver is initially formed as two separate entities, each being supplied by
a different group of arteries. A superior group for the left lobe, comprising branches of the left gastric a. (gastric
hepatocoronary a.) and the inferior diaphragmatic a. (hepatodiaphragmatic a.). An inferior group for the right lobe, with the
arteries originating from the celiac trunk or the aorta (hepatogastroduodenal a.) and the SMA (hepatomesenteric a.). All other
origins, whether from the renal, inferior diaphragmatic or splenic a., fits into one of these groups. It should be noted, however
that in human and comparative embryology the liver is not classically described as being derived from two separate precursor
organs. At best a horizontal development of right and left lobes is mentioned [13, 14], but these have never been shown to be
supplied by different segmental arteries.
The present observation of two persisting hepatic aa. (right and middle) can be explained by Tandler's theory [20], by shifting
the origin of the middle hepatic a. to the SMA. However, the additional findings of variant pancreatic aa., the lack of
pancreaticoduodenal arcades and a separate blood supply to the duodenum and pancreas cannot be explained by this theory,
because the theory states that arteries for the digestive system and liver have separate segmental origins, while those for the
pancreas originate from neighbouring segmental arteries for other organs [3, 4, 6]. Neither does Vincens' [23] theory provide
a basis for understanding the present case, as it only applies to the arteries of the liver.
Most studies on the arteries of the digestive system consider a single organ at a time [3, 4, 5, 17 ]. There appears to be no
report in the literature which includes descriptions of variants of the arteries of the entire superior celiac and mesenteric area,
as well as morphological variants of the associated organs. Such a study would prove invaluable in the understanding of the
embryological origin and development of the arteries based on the morphological variations of a single organ, as well as of
the entire region.
Not only do the present findings raise questions concerning the origin of variants, it also highlights the technical problems
that may occur in abdominal surgery and interventional radiology. Ligature of the right gastro -omental a. for total or distal
gastrectomy may jeopardize the blood supply to the head of pancreas. Vascular dissection and ligatures in cephalic
duodenopancreatectomy may prove difficult and seriously endanger the blood supply to the liver, especially if the variant is
not identified preoperatively. Because of the close relationship between the bile ducts and the hepatic aa., the surgical
approach may prove particularly difficult and dangerous. In liver transplantation, for example, if the subject with the variant
is the donor, reconstruction of the arteries on the recipient may be a problem, e.g. anastomosis with a single hepatic a.,
however if the subject with the variant is the recipient anastomosis with the artery on the transplanted liver will also be a
problem.
In interventional radiology selective catheterisation of the right hepatic a. may present technical difficulties, especially, for
example, if the catheter needs to be advanced into the right branch for chemical embolization. If the embolizing agent is
released before the anastomosis with the hepatic a., it may affect the duodenal territory of the right hepatic a. causing pain,
ischemia and perforation. The same may occur if the embolizing agent is released into the middle hepatic a. before it
anastomoses with the right hepatic a.
In conclusion, persisting hepatic aa. originating from the SMA do not have a satisfactory explanation according to current
embryological theories. An awareness of the variation presented here is essential because of its clinical implications.