Organic Letters
Letter
the reduction,10 we focused on the use of the “tethered”11
catalyst (R,R)-9 (Figure 3b), which we have previously found
to be very versatile in ATH applications. [1.1.1]Propellane was
initially converted to the ketone via reaction with PhMgBr
followed by trapping of the Grignard reagent with PhCOCl.
However, a significant amount of benzophenone was also
formed, which could not be separated from 10. We found that
10 could be made more cleanly through addition to an
aldehyde followed by oxidation with MnO2. ATH of BCP
ketone 10 gave the desired alcohol 11 with 97% ee, which
confirmed the sharp difference in directing effects between the
two groups flanking the ketone. Subsequent X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis of a chiral derivative (see the Supporting
Information) confirmed that the product configuration was R
using (R,R)-9. Applying the model previously proposed for
ATH indicates that reduction likely proceeds with the BCP
distal from the η6-arene (Figure 3c).12
The methodology was successfully extended to a number of
aromatic substrates and one enone (Figure 4). Alkyl
substitution on the aromatic ring was tolerated, giving products
with 99% ee for para-substituted substrates and slightly lower
for the m-methyl substrate. Substrates containing electron-
withdrawing groups such as p-CF3 and p-F were reduced with
lower ee, possibly reflecting a weaker η6-arene interaction.
Substrates containing electron-donating OMe groups were also
generally highly enantioselective in reductions (88−98% ee),
although a p-phenoxy substrate was reduced with a lower ee of
just 85%.
Figure 1. (a) BCP analogues of therapeutics where the BCP replaces
either an aromatic ring (1 and 2) or an alkyne (3 and 4). (b) BCP
analogues of therapeutics prepared by Anderson et al. (5 and 6) and
BCP derivatives containing alkenes reported by Aggarwal et al. (7 and
8).
A sharp contrast was exhibited by the formation of the
product of ATH of the o-OMe derivative (i.e., 19), which was
reduced with just 2% ee. This result reflects the lower
enantioselectivities observed for substrates such as 2-
methoxyacetophenone.11a This can be attributed to disruption
of the approach of the substrate to the catalyst due to a likely
twist of the aromatic ring out of planarity with the ketone. A p-
amino substrate was also tolerated, forming the alcohol with
97% ee, while a p-bromo substrate gave the alcohol with 81%
ee. Heterocycle-containing substrates were also enantioselec-
tively reduced by ATH, with furan (99% ee), thiophene (99%
ee), and pyridine (91% ee) all being compatible with the
conditions. The configurations were assigned by analogy with
that of the unsubstituted example, but in the case of 28, which
was reduced with just 41% ee, the configuration was not
established.
We also examined the reductions of ketones flanked by a
combination of BCP and an alkyne (Figure 4).13 We obtained
products with high ee (95−99% for all of the examples tested).
Hence, the reaction conditions were shown to be tolerant of
groups such as p- and o-methoxy, an alkyl group, trimethylsilyl,
and chloro. An X-ray crystal structure of 33 (see the
as R when (R,R) 9 was used in the reductions. This outcome
would correspond to the proposed mode of reduction of
propargylic ketones by this class of catalyst (Figure 3c).
To highlight the value of the BCP as an isostere of aromatic
rings and triple bonds that can facilitate the synthesis of highly
enantiomerically enriched products via ATH, we examined the
reduction of a range of comparator compounds (Figure 5);
products were formed with only moderate ee. The
combination of alkyne versus aromatic in ketones is also
known to be challenging.13b However, known and important
exceptions are provided by substrates containing ortho-
substituted aromatic rings, which give products with high ee
Figure 2. Potential BCP analogues of antihistamine therapeutics.
We prepared ketone precursors of the desired alcohols
through the reaction of Grignard reagents with [1.1.1]-
propellane2,3 followed by trapping with an appropriate
electrophile (as illustrated in Figure 3a for substrate 10). For
Figure 3. (a) Strategy for ATH of BCP ketones and their subsequent
asymmetric reduction using ATH, as illustrated for alcohol 11. (b)
Catalyst used in this study. (c) Likely modes of ATH.
3180
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3179−3183