â-hydroxy amino acid residues. For the purpose of deter-
mination of the absolute stereochemistry of 1, we required
a general method for preparation of several enantioenriched
diastereomers of â-hydroxy-R-amino acids, in particular,
â-hydroxyleucine (2) and γ-hydroxythreonine (3), as stan-
dards for chiral amino acid analysis. Recent strategies for
â-hydroxy amino acid synthesis include chiral catalytic
asymmetric aldol additions of benzophenone glycinates,4
Sharpless epoxidation of allylic alcohols followed by a benzyl
isocyanate addition-ring opening,5 and Strecker synthesis
of protected glyceraldehydes.6
Scheme 1a
We found aldol that addition of the lithium enolate of
N-(diphenylmethylene)glycine tert-butyl ester (4) to alde-
hydes, in the presence of (-)-sparteine, produced erythro
and threo diastereomers of â-hydroxy-R-amino esters in good
yield and each with good levels of asymmetric induction.
The method is general for aliphatic and aryl aldehydes and
is notable for its operational simplicity and easy transforma-
tion into optically active â-hydroxy-R-amino acid standards.
Aldol addition of the lithium enolate of 4 (-78 °C LDA,
THF) to isobutyraldehyde gave a mixture of racemic threo
oxazolidine (()-5a and erythro imine (()-5b (78%, 1:1.8
ratio, respectively).7 When the reaction was carried out in
toluene using n-BuLi/(-)-sparteine as base (-78 °C, 3 h,
Scheme 1), compounds 5a and 5b were obtained in com-
parable yield (67%) but reversed diastereoselectivity (2:1).
It is notable that deprotonation of 4 was efficient under these
conditions with no detectable byproducts (NMR, <2%)
arising from addition of n-BuLi.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) n-BuLi, (-)-sparteine, -78 °C,
toluene; (b) isobutyraldehyde, -78 °C, 3 h; (c) TFA, H2O, CH2Cl2,
25 °C; (d) 6 M HCl aq, 1 h.
by comparison of the measured optical rotations with
literature values ((+)-2a, [RD] +2.3°; lit.4a +3.5°; (-)-2b,
[RD] -18.5°, lit.4a -37°) and showed a preference for the
D-amino acid configuration in each diastereomer.
The method was applied to the synthesis of γ-hydroxy-
threonine isomers 3a and 3b (Scheme 2). Aldol addition of
4 to O-benzylglyoxal (6), in the presence of (-)-sparteine/
n-BuLi, gave oxazolidine 7a and imine 7b (62%, dr 2.3:1).
The enantioselectivity of the latter reaction was similar to
the above-described aldol addition and, again, gave amino
esters of predominantly D-configuration (58% ee and 56%
ee for 7a and 7b, respectively). Esters 7a and 7b were
converted to the γ-hydroxythreonine diastereomers 3a and
3b, employing the procedure described above, and their
configurations were secured by comparison of optical rota-
tions with samples prepared using an independent route.11
The scope of the asymmetric aldol addition was briefly
surveyed with selected alkyl and aryl aldehydes (Table 1).
Chiral HPLC analysis of purified isomers 5a and 5b, which
were easily separated by silica chromatography, showed
enantioselectivities of 60% and 56% ee, respectively.8 The
individual compounds were readily converted by hydrolysis-
hydrogenolysis to (+)-(2R,3S)-â-hydroxyleucine (2a) and
(-)-(2R,3R)-â-hydroxyleucine (2b), respectively (Scheme
1).9,10
The absolute configuration of each amino acid, and by
correlation, the aldol products 5a and 5b, was determined
(3) Hill, R. E.; Himmeldirk, K.; Kennedy, I. A.; Pauloski, R. M.; Sayer,
B. G.; Wolf, E.; Spenser, I. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271(48), 30426-30435.
(4) (a) O’Donnell, M. J. Aldrichimica Acta 2001, 34, 3-15 and references
cited within. (b) Horikawa, M.; Busch-Petersen, J.; Corey, E. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 3843-3846. (c) Belokon, Y. N.; Kochetkov, K. A.;
Ikonnikov, N. S.; Strelkova, T. V.; Harutyunyan, S. R.; Saghiyan, A. S.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 481-485
(5) (a) Nagamitsu, T.; Sunazuka, T.; Tanaka, H.; Omura, S.; Sprengeler,
P. A.; Smith, A. B., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3584-3590. (b)
Nagamitsu, T.; Sunazuka, T.; Tanaka, H.; Omura, S.; Sprengeler, P. A.;
Smith, A. B., III. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4447-4448.
Manaviazar, S.; Delisser, V. M. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 9181-9188. (h)
Corey, E. J.; Lee, D. H.; Choi, S. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6735-
6738. (i) Caldwell, C. G.; Bondy, S. S. Synthesis 1990, 34-36. (j) Jung,
M. E.; Jung, Y. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 6637-6640.
(6) Cataviela, C.; Diaz-de-Villegas, M. D.; Galvez, J. A.; Garcia, J. I.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 9563-9574.
(11) The (2S,3S)-L-threo and (2R,3S)-D-erythro â-hydroxythreonines were
synthesised as follows. Strecker synthesis with 2,3-isopropylidene-D-
glyceraldehyde and 9-aminofluorene (KCN, NaHSO3, MeOH aq) under
thermodynamic conditions (Inaba, T.; Fujita, M.; Ogura, K. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 1274-1279) gave a mixture of (2S,3R)-(-)-2-N-(9′-aminofluo-
renyl)-3,4-O-isopropylidene-3,4-dihydroxybutyronitrile and the correspond-
ing (2R,3R)-isomer (81%, 3:1 ratio, respectively) which was separated by
normal phase HPLC (2.5% i-PrOH:hexane). Separate acid hydrolysis of
the aminonitriles (1:1 HCl:AcOH, rt) followed by hydrogenolysis (H2,1 atm,
Pd(OH)2, MeOH) gave the γ-hydroxythreonine diastereomers (2S,3S)-
(-)-2-amino-3,4-dihydroxybutyric acid and (2R,3S)-(+)-2-amino-3,4-di-
hydroxybutyric acid, respectively. For a synthesis of the enantiomer of the
latter compound, see: Pirrung, M. C.; Nunn, D. S.; McPhail, A. T.; Mitchell,
R. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 2095-2098. For the definitive
configurational assignments of â-hydroxythreonine stereoisomers, see:
Hamel, E. E.; Painter, E. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 1362-1368.
Niemann, C.; Nichols, P. L. J Biol. Chem. 1942, 143, 191-199.
(7) The threo aldol products were isolated consistently in the form of
the cyclized oxazolidines. Cf. Corey, E. J.; et al.4
(8) Optical purities of all purified threo and erythro diastereomers were
determined by chiral HPLC (Chiral Pak OD column, 1-2.5% i-PrOH:
hexanes, UV and evaporative light scattering detectors).
(9) Jung, M. E.; Jung, Y. H. Tetrahedron Lett 1989, 48, 6637-6640.
(10) For recent syntheses of â-hydroxyleucine stereoisomers, see: (a)
Cardillo, G.; Gentilucci, L.; Gianotti, M.; Tolomelli, A. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 563-569. (b) Davis, F. A.; Srirajan, V.; Fanelli, D.
L.; Portonovo, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7663-7666. (c) Laib, T.;
Chastanet, J.; Zhu, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1709-1713. (d) Laib, T.;
Chastanet, J.; Zhu, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1771-1772. (e)
Williams, L.; Zhang, Z. D.; Ding, X. B.; Joullie, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 7031-7034. (f) Yadav, J. S.; Chandrasekhar, S.; Reddy, Y. R.;
Rao, A. V. R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2749-2754. (g) Hale, K. J.;
1884
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 11, 2002