coupling reactions of isocyanides with carbenes or diazo
compounds.7 Recently, we reported an amidation reaction
through hydrolysis of a ketenimine intermediate, which
was formed in situ through the Pd-catalyzed reaction of
isocyanides with N-tosylhydrazones.8
Scheme 2. Pd-Catalyzed One-Pot Reaction of Ethyl Diazoace-
tate, t-BuNC, and N-Benzylidene-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide
It is well documented that the reaction of ketenimines
with imines proceeds through a [2 þ 2] cycloaddition
process to produce 2-iminoazetidines,9 as in the case of
the copper-catalyzed three-component reaction10 of sulfo-
nyl azides, 1-alkynes, and imines (Scheme 1). We envi-
sioned that the same cyclic products may be obtained by
using imines to trap the ketenimine intermediates gener-
ated in situ from the Pd-catalyzed reaction of isocyanides and
diazo compounds. However, to our surprise, the Pd(OAc)2-
catalyzed one-pot reaction of ethyl diazo acetate 1, t-BuNC
2a, and N-benzylidene-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide 3a af-
forded three products at 40 °C in 1,2-dichloroethane, but no
[2 þ 2] cycloaddtion product 6a was detected (Scheme 2).
One isolated product was determined to be 5a, which was
formed through the direct reaction of ethyl diazo acetate 1
with imine 3a. The other two products were isomers, one of
which was unambiguously determined to be (E)-ethyl 2-(N-
tert-butyl-N0-tosylcarbamimidoyl)-3-phenylacrylate 4a by
X-ray crystallographic analysis.11 The other one 4a0, how-
ever, was unstable and transformed into 4a slowly in differ-
ent solvents such as ethyl acetate, chloroform, and methanol,
which we speculated to be the Z-isomer of 4a according to
the analysis of the 1H NMR and mass spectroscopic data.
The unexpected formation of the acrylamidine product
was interesting since the amidine skeleton is the key struc-
ture for many potent bioactive compounds,12 such as
NR2B subtype-selective antagonists13a and selective mus-
carinic agonists.13b Synthetic methods for such structures
are rare. The efficiency of the novel chemistry in our
Pd-catalyzed one-pot reaction for the synthesis of those
structures promoted us to optimize the reaction condi-
tions. As shown in Table 1, under the catalysis of 4 mol %
Pd(OAc)2, the three-component reaction was explored in
1,2-dichloroethane at different reaction temperatures. The
ratio of acrylamidine product 4a increased at elevated tem-
peratures, which was obtained in 70% yield at 80 °Cand75%
yield at 100 °C, respectively, accompanied by a small amount
of the unstable isomer 4a0 and byproduct 5a (Table 1, entries
2 and 3). Other solvents such as MeCN, DMF, toluene, THF,
and 1,4-dioxane were also screened, and DCE showed the
best results (Table 1, entries 4ꢀ8). Different Pd, Rh, and Cu
catalysts were also tested, and all gave inferior results by
comparison with that of Pd(OAc)2 (Table 1, entries 9ꢀ14) .
Scheme 1. Pd-Catalyzed One-Pot Reaction for the Formation of
Acrylamidines
Table 1. Condition Screeninga
t
yield (%)b yield (%)b
entry
catalyst
solvent
(°C)
4a/4a0
5a
1
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
PdCl2
DCE
40
24/34
70/9
33
13
9
2
DCE
DCE
MeCN
80
3
100
80
75/6
4
54/11
46/8
26
43
57
80
26
38
34
43
16
22
47
5
dioxane 80
6
toluene
THF
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
11/ꢀ
14/ꢀ
25/ꢀ
43/12
36/16
31/15
57/17
51/15
31/15
(7) (a) de Meijere, A.; Schirmer, H.; Duetsch, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2000, 39, 3964. (b) Aumann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988,
7
8
DMF
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
ꢀ
27, 1456. (c) Fernandez, I.; Cossio, F. P.; Sierra, M. A. Organometallics
9
2007, 26, 3010. (d) Hudall, T. W.; Moorhead, E. J.; Gusev, D. G.;
Bielawski, C. W. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2763. (e) Cheng, L.-Q.; Cheng,
Y. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9359. (f) Cheng, Y.; Cheng, L.-Q. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 2625. (g) Canac, Y.; Conejero, S.; Donnadieu, B.; Schoeller,
W. W.; Bertrand, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7312. (h) Merceron,
N.; Miqueu, K.; Baceiredo, A.; Bertrand, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 6806. (i) Ciganek, E. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 862.
10
11
12
13
14
Pd2(dba)3
Pd(PPh3)4
c
Rh2(OAc)4
Rh(PPh3)3Clc DCE
CuId
DCE
(8) Zhou, F.; Ding, K.; Cai, Q. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12268.
(9) (a) van Camp, A.; Gossens, D.; Moya-Portuguez, M.; Marchand-
Brynaert, J.; Ghosez, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3081. (c) Alajarın,
M.; Vidal, A.; Tovar, F.; Arrieta, A.; Lecea, B.; Cossıo, F. P. Chem.;
Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1106.
a Reagents and reaction conditions: 1 (0.6 mmol, 1.2 equiv), 2a
(1.5 mmol, 3.0 equiv), 3a (0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv), catalyst (4 mol %), solvent
(1.5 mL), 20 h. b Isolated yield. c Catalyst (2 mol %). d Catalyst (10 mol %).
(10) Whiting, M.; Fokin, V. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3157.
(11) See Supporting Information.
ꢀ
(13) (a) Thominiaux, C.; de Bruin, B.; Bramoulle, Y.; Hinnen, F.;
Demphel, S.; Valette, H.; Bottlaender, M.; Besret, L.; Kassiou, M.;
(12) (a) Boyd, G. V. In The Chemistry of Amidines and Imidates; Patai,
S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1991; Vol. 2, Chapter 8. (b)
Dunn, P. J. Amidines and N-Substituted Amidines. In Comprehensive
Organic Functional Group Transformations II; Katritzky, A. R., Tayler,
R. J. K., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 2005; Vol. 5, pp 655ꢀ699.
ꢀ
Dolle, F. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2006, 64, 348. (b) Ojo, B.; Dunbar, P. G.;
Durant, G. J.; Nagy, P. I.; Huzl, J. J., III; Periyasamy, S.; Ngur, D. O.;
El-Assadi, A. A.; Hoss, W. P.; Messer, W. S., Jr. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
1996, 4, 1605.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX