C-14, and C-16. Meanwhile, protons of H-13, H-14, and
H-12 also showed critical HMBC correlations to an sp3
quaternary carbon at δC 80.6 (C-16). These HMBC corre-
lations indicated that a five-membered carbon ring (ring C,
Figure 1) was formed by C-15, C-8, C-14, C-13, and C-16.
Moreover, rings B and C comprised a bicyclo[3.2.1]octane
ring system, and C-8 and C-13 were bridged by C-14.
Furthermore, three oxygenated carbons in rings B and C
(δC 68.7, 79.3, and 80.6) were assigned to C-12, C-14, and
C-16, respectively, by the HMBC correlations from H2-11,
H-9, and H-13 to C-12 (δC 68.7); from H2-15 and H-13 to
C-14 (δC 79.3); and from H2-15, H-13, and H-12 to C-16
(δC 80.6). A tertiary methyl proton signal appearing at δH
2.34 showed strong HMBC correlations to the ketone
carbon (δC 211.5) and C-9, which not only suggested the
existence of an acetyl group but also placed it at C-9 of ring
B. Another tertiary methyl at δH 2.05 was connected
to C-16 of ring C as shown by HMBC correlations from
H3-17 to C-16, C-13, and C-15.
Compound 1, [R]20 þ 41.0 (c 0.08, MeOH), was
D
isolated as an amorphous powder. The molecular formula
was established as C20H32O8 by HRESI-MS with an m/z
423.2000 [M þ Na]þ (calcd 423.1989), corresponding to 5
degrees of unsaturation. The IR spectrum indicated the
presence of an ester carboxyl group (1757 cmꢀ1) and a
ketone moiety (1701 cmꢀ1). The 13C and DEPT NMR
spectra (Table 1) revealed four sp3 quaternary carbons
(two oxygenated at δC 81.4 and 80.6), five sp3 methines
(three oxygenated at δC 84.6, 79.3 and 68.7), five sp3
methylenes (one oxygenated at δC 57.8), four tertiary
methyls, and two sp2 quaternary carbons (one ketone
carbon at δC 211.5 and one ester carbonyl carbon at δC
181.9). Among the 20 carbons, two carbonyl carbons
accounted for 2 degrees of unsaturation, which suggested
that 1 is a diterpenoid possessing a tricyclic ring system.
The gross structure of 1 was initially deduced by com-
prehensive analysis of its 1D and 2D NMR spectra.
1
1
Figure 1. Selected Hꢀ H COSY and HMBC correlations for
1
According to the 1Hꢀ H COSY and HSQC spectra, three
compound 1.
spin systems [a: C(9)HꢀC(11)H2ꢀC(12)HꢀC(13)Hꢀ
C(14)H; b: C(6)HꢀC(7)H2; c: C(1)H2ꢀC(2)H2] were es-
tablished, as shown in Figure 1. In a, the protons of H-9
and H-14 showed significant HMBC correlations to an sp3
quaternary carbon at δC 50.9 (C-8), which suggested that
C-8, C-9, C-11, C-12, C-13, and C-14 constituted a six-
membered carbon ring (ring B, Figure 1). In contrast, the
protons of H2-15 showed HMBC correlations to C-8, C-9,
The abovespectral data establishedunitI (Figure 1) of1,
which resembles rings C/D of grayanane. However, the
remaining part (unit II, Figure 1) of 1 was quite different
from any known grayananes. The nine carbons of unit II
showed signals at δC 181.9 (C), 84.4 (CH), 81.4 (C), 57.8
(CH2), 48.3 (C), 35.7 (CH2), 32.6 (CH2), 22.1 (CH3), and
18.6 (CH3). The HMBC correlations from H3-18 and
H3-19 to C-3 (δC 181.9), C-4 (δC 48.3), and C-5 (δC 81.4)
indicated a fragment of ꢀC(5)(O)ꢀC(4)(CH3)2ꢀCOOꢀ.
Meanwhile, HMBC correlations from H2-1 and H2-2 to
C-5 established the connection of C-1 to C-5; HMBC
correlations from H-6 and H2-7 to C-5 suggested the direct
connection between C-6 and C-5. To fulfill the 5 degrees of
unsaturation, an additional ring (ring A, Figure 1) was
required in unit II of 1. Considering that C-6 (CH) (δC
84.4) shifted dramatically downfield comparedto a normal
hydroxylated methine, a lactone was likely present at this
position. The structure of unit II of 1 (Figure 1) was
thereby constructed, in which the 5/7-fused ring system of
grayanane was absent and replaced with a γ-lactone ring.
Finally, the connection of the two units (I and II) via C-7
and C-8 was confirmed by the key HMBC correlations
from H-6 and H-7 to C-8 (δC 50.9). As a result, the planar
structure of 1 was fully established, which is a new 1,10:2,3-
disecograyanane skeleton.
Table 1. NMR Data of Compound 1 in C5D5N (J in Hz)8
no.
1
δH
δC
no.
11
δH
δC
a 2.28 (dt,
14.5, 7.0)
b 2.18 (dt,
14.5, 7.0)
4.30 (m)
ꢀ
35.7
2.12 (m)
30.2
2
3
4
5
57.8
181.9
48.3
81.4
12
13
14
15
4.31 (m)
68.7
61.5
79.3
53.0
2.89 (brs)
5.29 (d, 6.0)
a 2.44 (d, 14.5)
b 2.00 (d, 14.5)
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
6
7
4.60 (brd, 10.0)
a 3.04 (brd,
15.5)
84.4
32.6
16
17
80.6
26.1
2.05 (s)
b 2.66 (dd,
15.5, 10.0)
ꢀ
8
50.9
53.2
211.5
18
19
20
1.44 (s)
1.57 (s)
2.34 (s)
22.1
18.6
30.5
9
3.26 (brd, 7.0)
ꢀ
10
The relative configuration of unit I was deduced by
NOESY experiments (Figure 2). A chair conformation
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX