10.1002/cctc.201701355
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
using the Pt-MoOx/TiO2 catalyst. This method may be a
dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-
STEM), in conjunction with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDS) mapping images were taken on a JEM-2100F (JEOL)
operated at 200 kV accelerating voltage. The samples for
TEM, STEM and EDS analyses were prepared by putting drops of a
methanol solution onto a carbon-coated copper grid.
sustainable route to N-substituted lactams from biomass.
Experimental Section
General
Commercially available organic compounds (from Tokyo Chemical
Industry, Sigma-Aldrich, or Kanto Chemical Co. Ltd.) were used
without further purification. The GC (Shimadzu GC-2014) and GCMS
(Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010) analyses were carried out with Ultra
ALLOY capillary column UA+-1 (Frontier Laboratories Ltd.) using
nitrogen and He as the carrier gas.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the ENEOS Hydrogen Trust Fund,
KAKENHI grants JP16H06595 and JP17H01341 from JSPS, and a
MEXT program "Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research
Center". The authors are indebted to the technical division of the
Institute for Catalysis (Hokkaido University) for the manufacturing of
experimental equipment.
Catalyst preparation
TiO2 (JRC-TIO-4, 50 m2 g-1) was supplied from Catalysis Society of
Japan. The M-MoOX/TiO2 catalysts (M = 5 wt% Pt, Ir, Ru, Rh, Pd, Re,
Ni, Co, Cu; 7 or 15 wt% Mo) were prepared by a sequential
impregnation method as follows. Metal sources were aqueous HNO3
solutions of Pt(NH3)2(NO3)2, Rh(NO3)3, and Pd(NH3)2(NO3)2 and
aqueous solution of RuCl3, NH4ReO4, nitrates (Ni, Co, Cu), and
(NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O. MoO3-loaded TiO2 (MoO3/TiO2) was prepared
by mixing TiO2 powder with aqueous solution of (NH4)6Mo7O244H2O
(50 mL), followed by evaporation of the mixture at 50 °C, drying the
solid at 90 °C for 12 h, and by calcination in air at 500 °C for 3 h.
Then, MoO3/TiO2 and aqueous HNO3 solution of Pt(NH3)2(NO3)2
were mixed, evaporated, dried at 90 °C to yield a Pt(II)-loaded
precursor. Before the catalytic experiment, the catalysts were
prepared by reduction of the precursor in a Pyrex tube under flowing
H2 (20 cm3 min-1) at 300 °C for 0.5 h.
Keywords: amination • hydrogenation • keto acids • nitriles
[1] a) A. Corma, S. Iborra, A. Velty, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2411–
2502; b) P. Mäki-Arvela, I. L. Simakova, T. Salmi, D. Y. Murzin,
Chem. Rev. 2013, 114, 1909–1971; c) J. Pritchard, G. A. Filonenko,
R. Van Putten, E. J. M. Hensen, E. A. Pidko, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015,
44, 3808– 3833; d) K. Tomishige, Y. Nakagawa, M. Tamura, Green
Chem. 2017, 19, 2876–2924.
[2] L. E. Manzer, US Patent 6743819 B1, 2004.
[3] L. E. Manzer, US Patent 2006/247443A1, 2006.
[4] Y. Wei, C. Wang, X. Jiang, D. Xue, Z. T. Liu, J. Xiao, Green Chem.
2014, 16, 1093–1096.
[5] Y. B. Huang, J. J. Dai, X. J. Deng, Y. C. Qu, Q. X. Guo, Y. Fu,
ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 1578–1581.
Catalytic reactions
The catalytic reactions were carried out as follows. After the
reduction, the as-prepared catalyst in the closed Pyrex tube sealed
with a septum inlet was cooled to room temperature under H2,
followed injection of mixture of 1 mmol levulinic acid (LA), 1 mmol
nitriles, and 0.2 mmol n-dodecane. Then, the septum was removed
under air, a magnetic stirrer bar was put in the tube, followed by
inserting the tube inside stainless autoclave (28 cm3). After being
sealed, the reactor was charged with 7 bar H2 and heated at 110 ˚C
under stirring (500 rpm). After 24 h, the reactor was cooled followed
by adding 2-propanol (6 cm3) to the mixture, followed by removal of
the catalyst by filtration, conversions and yields of products were
determined by GC using n-dodecane as an internal standard using
the GC-sensitivity estimated by the commercial compounds (nitriles)
or isolated products. For the reactions in Table 3 and 4, the mixture
after the reaction was concentrated under vacuum evaporator to
remove the volatile compounds, and then lactams were isolated by
column chromatography using silica gel 60 (spherical, 63-210 μm,
Kanto Chemical Co. Ltd.) with hexane/ethylacetate (7/3) as the
eluting solvent, followed by analyses by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and
GCMS.
[6] Y. Wei, C. Wang, X. Jiang, D. Xue, J. Li, J. Xiao, Chem. Commun.
2013, 49, 5408–5410.
[7] C. Ortiz-Cervantes, M. Flores-Alamo, J. J. García, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2016, 57, 766–771.
[8] A. Ledoux, L. S. Kuigwa, E. Framery, B. Andrioletti, Green Chem.
2015, 17, 3251–3254.
[9] Y. Ogiwara, T. Uchiyama, N. Sakai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016,
55, 1864–1867.
[10] X. L. Du, L. He, S. Zhao, Y. M. Liu, Y. Cao, H. He, K. N. Fan,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7815–7819.
[11] L. E. Manzer, F. E. Herkes, US Patent 0192933, 2004.
[12] A. S. Touchy, S. M. A. H. Siddiki, K. Kon, K. Shimizu, ACS Catal.
2014, 4, 3045–3050.
[13] J. D. Vidal, M. J. Climent, P. Concepcion, A. Corma, S. Iborra,
M. J. Sabater, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5812–5821.
[14] G. Chieffi, M. Braun, D. Esposito, ChemSusChem 2015, 8,
3590–3594.
[15] C. de Bellefon, P. Fouilloux, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 1994, 36, 459–
506.
[16] S. Werkmeister, K. Junge, M. Beller, Org. Process Res. Dev.
2014, 18, 289–302.
Characterization
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-angle annular
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.