Scheme 3. Synthesis of Fragment 9
Scheme 4. Fragment Coupling and Macrocyclization
Fragments 8 and 9 were coupled using an HWE reaction
under MasamuneÀRoush conditions15 to give enone 18 in
84% yield (Scheme 4). Hydrogenation and Wittig methy-
lenation afforded 19 in 96% yield. Formation of the
β-ketophosphonate, selective removal of the primary
TBS group, and oxidation of the resultant alcohol gave
aldehyde 7. An intramolecular HWE reaction afforded the
desired macrocycle (>95:5 E/Z selectivity) and its dimer as
a 3:1 inseparable mixture in 98% yield. Subsequent treat-
ment with DDQ to remove the PMB group followed by
oxidation of the secondary alcohol with DessÀMartin
periodinane provided macrocyclic ketone 6 in 60% yield
over three steps.16
Scheme 5. C4ÀC10 Transannular Aldol Reaction
Treatment of macrocyclic ketone 6 with L-Selectride
in THF at À78 °C afforded an aldol product that was
immediately silylated with TMSOTf to provide 20 as a single
diasteriomer in 66% yield over two steps (Scheme 5).17,18
The cis ring fusion was readily deduced by NOESY correla-
tions. Silyl protection of the tertiary alcohol was mandatory
due to facile retroaldolization driven by the release of strain
in the 11-membered ring.10 Indeed, the 14-membered dike-
tone (not shown) was observed as a side product in the
reaction which we suspect arises from retro-aldolization and
subsequent protonation of the enolate.
The observed diastereoselectivity in the C4ÀC10 TA
aldol reaction may be attributed to the formation of a
stereochemically well-definedlithium enolate19 that under-
goes reaction via an open transition state. Chamberlin
and Reich have shown that enolate geometry (E or Z) in
conjugate reductions with L-Selectride is dictated by the
ground-state conformational preference of the enone under
non-CurtinÀHammett constraints.20 Accordingly, a Monte
Carlo conformational search using MMFF21 identified
s-cis-21 as the lowest energy enone conformer (Figure 3).
Considering the difference in energy (>3.0 kcal/mol) be-
tween s-cis and s-trans enones, selective formation of the (Z)
lithium enolate may be anticipated. Relative energies of the
diastereomeric transition states were approximated by con-
straining the distance between the enolate and carbonyl
carbons and undertaking a second conformational search.22
The conformation in which the enolate and carbonyl oxy-
gens are oriented on opposite sides of the macrocyclic plane
leadingtoanopentransitionstate(TS1) was found to be the
lowest in energy. The conformation leading to an apparent
closed transition state (TS2) was calculated to be 5.3 kcal/
mol higher in energy. On the basis of this difference in
energy and considering that the trialkylborane generated
in situ can activate the carbonyl group, an open transition
is likely. Intermoleclar reductive aldol reactions mediated
by L-Selectride reported by Ghosh23 are also believed to
proceed via an open transition state and lend support to this
conclusion.
(15) Blanchette, M. A.; Choy, W.; Davis, J. T.; Essenfeld, A. P.;
Masamune, S.; Roush, W. R.; Sakai, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
2183.
(16) The 28-membered ring dimer was readily separated from the
desired macrocycle by flash chromatography after the DessÀMartin
oxidation. See the Supporting Information for full characterization.
(17) For conjugate reduction with L-Selectride as a means of enolate
formation, see: Fortunato, J. M.; Ganem, B. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41,
2194.
(18) Stryker’s reagent ([(PPh3)CuH]6) was also effective as a hydride
source. For reductive aldol reactions with Stryker’s reagent, see: Chiu,
P.; Szeto, C.-P.; Geng, Z.; Cheng, K.-F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1901.
(19) Conjugate reduction with L-Selectride favors the formation of a
lithium enolate as opposed to a boron enolate. The yield of boron
enolate, however, has been shown to be highly dependent on the alkali-
metal cation in the order of K > Na > Li; see: Ma, L.; Hopson, R.; Li,
D.; Zhang, Y.; Williard, P. G. Organometallics 2007, 26, 5834.
(20) Chamberlin, A. R.; Reich, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
1440.
With bicyclic intermediate 20 in hand (Scheme 5), the
second TA aldol reaction to form the C8ÀC9 bond was
(21) Halgren, T. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490.
˚
(22) A transition-state distance constraint of 2.1 A was employed in
this computation; see: Lewars, E. G. Computational Chemistry: Intro-
duction to the Theory and Applications of Molecular and Quantum
Mechanics, 2nd ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2011; p 63.
(23) Ghosh, A. K.; Kass, J.; Anderson, D. D.; Xu, X.; Marian, C.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4811.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C