metalloporphyrins has not been developed into a practical
methodology for preparation of fine chemicals and
pharmaceutically important small molecules. First, this
unfortunate situation is largely attributed to the formidable
challenges associated with the synthesis of chiral porphyr-
ins and the highly planar structure of porphyrin ligands
that prohibits the introduction of chirality around the
metal center. In addition, the oxidant is more often iodo-
sylbenzene and 2,6-dichloropyridine N-oxide, which are
not considered environmentally friendly.
synergetic effect in the epoxidation of olefins with hydrogen
peroxide as the terminal oxidant in terms of activity and
enantioselectivity.7 In addition, the enantioselective intro-
duction and steric hindrance could be regulated by the chiral
oxazolines, which can be synthesized from commercially
available R or βamino acids. Herein, we report a general AE
method of olefins by a porphyrin-inspired chiral manganese
complex using H2O2 as the terminal oxidant in high yields
with excellent enantioselectivities (up to greater than
99% ee), as well as application of the method to the gram-
scale synthesis of optically pure epoxide and chiral drug
S-Levcromakalim.
For our investigations, we chose chromene 1a as the
model substrate because its product is of potential value
as a pharmaceutical intermediate.8 Initially, when 1a was
reacted with 0.2 mol % iron metals and ligand L2 in the
presence of H2O2/AcOH in acetonitrile, no epoxidation
was observed (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). By replacing
iron metals with MnCl2, the epoxidation resulted in only
low conversion of the starting material (Table 1, entry 3).
Gratifyingly, using Mn(OTf)2 led to a significant improve-
ment in terms of reactivity and enantioselectivity
(95% yield, 95% ee; Table 1, entry 5). Besides Mn(OTf)2,
Mn(OAc)2 could also be used, although the yield was
slightly lower than that obtained by using Mn(OTf)2
(Table 1, entry 4). After testing the loading of acetic acid,
we identified that the best results were achieved upon
addition of acetic acid (5.0 equiv) with respect to the
substrate (Table 1, entries 5À7). Preliminary results indi-
cated that the reaction temperature had certain effects on
the yield and enantioselectivity (Table 1, entries 5, 8, and 9).
The ee values could be promoted when the temperature
was decreased to 0 °C. The ee values remained the same by
further lowering the temperature to À20 °C. Subsequently,
examination of various ligands showed that L2 was the
best choice regarding yield and enantioselectivity under
the optimized conditions (Table 1, entries 5 and 10À13).
Finally, the catalyst loading was successfully lowered to
0.1 mol % with only a slight decrease in the yield (Table 1,
entry 14).
Figure 1. Design strategy for chiral ligand.
Recently, in view of the difficulty in the synthesis of chiral
porphyrin, Niwa and Nakada developed an easily prepared
1,8-(bisoxazolyl)-carbazole iron complex with porphyrin-
like properties for the AE of trans-stilbene derivatives
applying iodosobenzene in the presence of sodium tetrakis-
[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (NaBARF).6 Un-
fortunately, the types of substrates are limited, and the
oxidant is environmentally unfriendly. With this back-
ground in mind, it was envisioned that we could develop a
new alternative to porphyrins that fulfills structural require-
ments of the porphyrins in some way, which possesses a
long conjugation and strong donor moieties and can also
obtain good results for the AE of a relatively wide range of
substrates using an environmentally benign oxidant. To our
delight, we designed and synthesized a totally new type of
tetradentate nitrogen based ligands that can be simply
prepared, are structurally diverse, and are sterically tunable
as well as allows easy introduction of chirality (Figure 1).
The tetradentate ligands have relatively long conjugation
and two NÀH moieties that exhibit strong σ-donation.
Moreover, Katsuki and co-workers disclosed that NÀH
groups in the organometallic catalyst have a significant
With the optimized conditions in hand, we turned our
attention to examining the scope of substrates using the
Mn(OTf)2ÀL2 complex (Table 2). As expected, a wide
variety of olefins could be efficiently epoxidized efficiently
within short reaction times, providing the corresponding
chromene derivatives (entries 1À15), indene (entry 16),
1,2-dihydronaphthalene (entry 17), and trans-stilbene ep-
oxides (entry 18) in high yields and excellent enantioselec-
tivities. It is noteworthy that various electron-withdrawing
(5) (a) Collman, J. P.; Wang, Z.; Straumanis, A.; Quelquejeu, M.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
Rose, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 460–461. (b) Perollier, C.; Pecaut,
J.; Ramasseul, R.; Marchon, J.-C. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 3758–3759. (c)
Rose, E.; Ren, Q. Z.; Andrioletti, B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, 224–230.
(d) Berkessel, A.; Frauenkron, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997,
2265–2266. (e) Zhang, R.; Yu, W.-Y.; Lai, T.-S.; Che, C.-M. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 409–410. (f) Berkessel, A.; Kaiser, P.; Lex, J. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4746–4756. (g) Collman, J. P.; Brauman, J. I.; Hampton,
P. D.; Tanaka, H.; Bohle, D. S.; Hembre, R. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 7980–7984. (h) Konishi, K.; Oda, K.; Nishida, K.; Aida, T.; Inoue,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1313–1317. (i) Sundermeyer, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 1144–1146. (j) Collman, J. P.; Lee, V. J.; Zhang,
X.; Ibers, J. A.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3834–3835.
(k) Groves, J. T.; Myers, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5791–5796.
(6) Niwa, T.; Nakada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13538–13541.
(7) (a) Matsumoto, K.; Sawada, Y.; Saito, B.; Sakai, K.; Katsuki, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4935–4939. (b) Sawada, Y.; Matsumoto,
K.; Kondo, S.; Watanabe, H.; Ozawa, T.; Suzuki, K.; Saito, B.; Katsuki,
T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3478–3480. (c) Sawada, Y.;
Matsumoto, K.; Katsuki, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4559–
4561. (d) Kondo, S.; Saruhashi, K.; Seki, K.; Matsubara, K.; Miyaji, K.;
Kubo, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Katsuki, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
10195–10198. (e) Matsumoto, K.; Oguma, T.; Katsuki, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7432–7435. (f) Egami, H.; Oguma, T.; Katsuki, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5886–5895.
(8) Lee, N. H.; Muci, A. R.; Jacobsen, E. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,
32, 5055–5058.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX