Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 4
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
whereas killing efficiency was marginally different in the case
of B. subtilis (MIC = 6, 7 mug/mL for DIF.TRIS.Zn and DIF
various salts of NSAIDs following salt metathesis is developed
DOI: 10.1039/C6CC07712A
,
respectively). While the role of Zn in killing gram negative as multi-drug-self-delivery system. One such hydrogelators
bacteria was quite clear from the data, such role was not so namely DIF.TRIS.Zn was found to be biocompatible (MTT
evident in killing gram positive bacteria; this could be because assay), anti-inflammatory (PGE2 assay) and anti-bacterial (zone
of the thicker cell membrane of the gram negative bacteria i.e. of inhibition) and displayed rheoreversibility (injectable)
E. coli making it comparatively more difficult to kill
and Fig. S55, ESI†). Zone of inhibition (ZH) studies on agar-
gelatin film subsequently established that the (EMR/2016/00894), New Delhi, and IACS for financial support.
(Table S12 thereby making it suitable for combination therapy.
PD thanks DBT (BT/01/CEIB/II/V/13),
DST
metallohydrogelator was relatively more efficient in killing RR thanks CSIR, New Delhi, for SRF. We thank Prof. Prasanta
both gram positive and gram negative bacteria compared to Kumar Das of Department of Biological Chemistry, IACS for his
the parent drug DIF as evident from the radii of the zone of support in the bacterial experiments.
inhibition (Fig. 3A-D). To demonstrate the suitability of the
metallohydrogelator in self-delivery application, we undertook
leaching experiments wherein 100 μL of PBS (pH 7.4) solution
Notes and references
was placed over a gel bed (100 μL, 8 wt% hydrogel of
DIF.TRIS.Zn) in a 5 mL test tube. Five such test tubes were
incubated at 37 °C for various time intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, and 24
h in each case). The concentration of the gelator in the PBS
layer was quantified in triplicate by UV-spectrophotometric
method. From the data, it was clear that the leaching of
1
(a) P. Terech and R. G. Weiss, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 3133; (b)
J. W. Steed, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3686; (c) M.-O. M.
Piepenbrock, G. O. Lloyd, N. Clarke and J. W. Steed, Chem.
Rev., 2010, 110, 1960; (d) O. Lebel, M. Perron, T. Maris, S. F.
Zalzal, A. Nanci and J. D. Wuest, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18
,
3616; (e) Marleen Haring and David Dıaz Dıaz, Chem.
Commun., 2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6CC06533C.
2
N. M. Sangeetha and U. Maitra, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34
,
modified drug from the hydrogel was 52% after 24h (Fig. S54,
821.
ESI†).
3
4
5
6
7
M. George and R. G. Weiss, Acc. Chem. Res., 2006, 39, 489.
X. Du, J. Zhou, J. Shi and B. Xu, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 13165.
As both Zn(II) and DIF are reported to be emissive,17 we
employed DIF.TRIS.Zn for cellular imaging. For this purpose,
RAW 264.7 cells were incubated in presence of the
E. Carretti, L. Dei and R. G. Weiss, Soft Matter, 2005,
L. Yu and J. Ding, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 1473.
1, 17.
(a) F. Zhao, M. L. Ma and B. Xu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38
,
hydrogelator at 37 C under 5% CO2 for 15 mins and subjected
883; (b) S. Bhuniya, Y. J. Seo and B. H. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2006, 47, 7153; (c) M. J. Webber, J. B. Matson, V. K. Tamboli
and S. I. Stupp, Biomaterials, 2012, 33, 6823; (d) K. J. C. van
Bommel, M. C. A. Stuart, B. L. Feringa and J. van Esch, Org.
to observation under fluorescence microscope excited with
blue light. Significantly intense green fluorescence could be
seen from the cells. Manual z-stacking of each layer of the
treated cells ruled out the possibility of mere adherence of the
hydrogelator on the cell membrane and supported the uptake
of the drug-derived-hydrogelator within the cells (Fig. 3E-G
and z-stacking animation video, ESI†).
Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 2917; (e) P. K. Vemula, J. Li and G.
John, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 8932; (f) R. V. Ulijn and A.
M. Smith, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 664; (g) R. Langer,
Nature, 1998, 392, 5; (h) J. H. Jung, J. H. Lee, J. R. Silverman
and G. John, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 924; (i) S. Fleming
and R. V. Ulijn, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 8150.
(a) J. B. Matson and S. I. Stupp, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47,
7962; (b) R. Roy, J. Deb, S. S. Jana and P. Dastidar, Chem. Eur.
J., 2014, 20, 15320 and references therein.
8
9
M. S. Aw, M. Kurian and D. Losic, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19
12586; and references therein.
,
10 T. Kern, M. Giffard, S. Hediger, A. Amoroso, C. Giustini, N. K.
Bui, B. Joris, C. Bougault, W. Vollmer and J.-P. Simorre, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 10911.
11 B. J. Lee and J. R. Lee, Arch. Pharmacal Res., 1995, 18, 22.
12 T. Kundu, S. C. Sahoo, S. Saha and R. Banerjee, Chem.
Commun., 2013, 49, 5262.
13 Q.-S. Wang, Y. Xiang, Y.-L. Cui, K- M. Lin and X.-F. Zhang, PLoS
ONE, 2012, 7, e34122.
14 E. Heiss, C. Herhaus, K. Klimo, B. Bartsch and C. Gerhauser, J.
Biol. Chem., 2001, 276, 32008.
15 (a) A. Shome, S. Dutta, S. Maiti and P. K. Das, Soft Matter,
2011,
7, 3011; (b) S. K. Mandal, S. Brahmachari and P. K. Das,
ChemPlusChem, 2014, 79
,
1733; (c) A. Makovitzki, D.
Avrahami, and Y. Shai, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2006, 103
15997.
,
16 S. Shrivastava, T. Bera, A. Roy, G. Singh, P. Ramachandrarao
and D. Dash, Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, 225103.
17 (a) H. G. Brittain, B. J. Elder, P. K. Isbester and A. H. Salerno,
Pharmaceutical Research, 2005, 22, 999; (b) M. Tsuchiya, R.
Sakamoto, M. Shimada, Y. Yamanoi, Y. Hattori, K. Sugimoto,
E. Nishibori and H. Nishihara, Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55, 5732.
Fig. 3 Antibacterial activity of DIF (A, C, ZH = 10, 9 mm, respectively) and DIF.TRIS.Zn (B,
D, ZH = 15, 11 mm, respectively) in fused agar–gelatin films against B.subtilis and E.coli
respectively; fluorescent microscopy images of the RAW 264.7 cells incubated with the
metallohydrogelator DIF.TRIS.Zn. (E) bright field, (F) fluorescence and (G) overlay
images.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins