F.C. Santos et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (2009) 5476–5481
5481
recombinant human interleukin-2 (Sigma). The virus isolate Ba-L
(R5-tropic, subtype B15) was used for cell infections, and virus
stocks were prepared in PHA-activated PBMCs from normal
donors.
pound’s potential to qualify for a drug and is related to topological
descriptors, fingerprints of molecular druglikeness, structural keys
and other properties such as cLog P and molecular mass.18
The pharmacokinetic profile, important for a good oral biovaila-
bility of a compound, was also evaluated according to the Lipinski’s
‘rule-of-five’, which analyses features that a drug should present to
allow the absorption and permeation across the membranes and
states molecular weight 6500 daltons (Da), calculated octanol/
water partition coefficient (cLog P) 65, number of hydrogen-bond
acceptors (nHba) 610, and number of hydrogen-bond donors
(nHbd) 65 (Lipinski, 2001), as well as a fifth rule added later, which
infers the number of rotatable bonds 610.19
4.2.2. Evaluation of cytotoxic effects
4.2.2.1. Cytotoxicity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMCs). The cytotoxic effect was determined colorimetrically
using XTT method.16 In brief, 50
lL of XTT were added to cells
and the optical density was measured at 450 nm 2 h later. The
50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) was defined as the concentra-
tion (lM) that reduced cell viability by 50% when compared to un-
treated controls.
Acknowledgments
4.2.2.2. Cytotoxicity in vero cells. Vero cells were cultured in
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with
5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, Utah), 100 U/mL pen-
We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico
e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal
Docente (CAPES) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do
Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) for the financial support. Thanks are also
due to HU/UFRJ hemoterapy service and NIH AIDS Reagent Pro-
gram. The technical assistance of Samara and Hania is gratefully
acknowledged. The authors also thank Professor Gilberto Alves
Romeiro (UFF) and Professor Marcos Eberlin (UNICAMP) for
recording the HRMS spectra.
icillin and 100
Monolayer of 104 vero cells in 96-multiwell plates was treated
with various concentrations of the compounds for 72 h. Then, 50
lg/mL streptomycin, at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
ll
of 1 mg/mL solution of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl
tetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma) was added to evaluate cell via-
bility according to procedures described elsewhere.17 The 50%
cytotoxic concentration (CC50) was calculated by linear regression
analysis of the dose–response curves.
References and notes
4.2.3. Anti-hiv-1 activity
1. (a) Snyder, S.; D’Argenio, D. Z.; Weislow, O.; Bilello, J. A.; Drusano, G. L.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1051; (b) Stebbing, J.; Bower, M.;
Mandalia, S.; Nelson, M.; Gazzard, B. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 1452, 271.
2. Stevenson, M. Sci. Am. 2008, 299, 78.
3. (a) Zhang, Z.; Fu, J.; Zhao, Q.; He, Y.; Jin, L.; Zhang, H.; Yao, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, F.
J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 5644; (b) Rodriguez-Arenas, M. A.; Jarrin, I.; Del Amo, J.;
Iribarren, J. A.; Moreno, S.; Viciana, P.; Pena, A.; Gomez Sirvent, J. L.; Vidal, F.;
Lacruz, J.; Gutierrez, F.; Oteo, J. A.; Asencio, R.; Castilla, J.; Perez Hoyos, S. AIDS
Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2006, 22, 715; (c) Sabin, C. A.; Smith, C. J.; Youle, M.;
Lampe, F. C.; Bell, D. R.; Puradiredja, D.; Lipman, M. C. I.; Bhagani, S.; Phillips, A.
N.; Johnson, M. A. AIDS 2006, 20, 67.
4. (a) Baba, M.; Okamoto, M.; Makino, M.; Kimura, Y.; Ikeuchi, T.; Sakaguchi, T.;
Okamoto, T. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1250; (b) Cecchetti, V.;
Parolin, C.; Moro, S.; Pecere, T.; Filipponi, E.; Calistri, A.; Tabarrini, O.; Gatto, B.;
Palumbo, M.; Fravolini, A.; Palu, G. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3799.
5. (a) Canuto, C. V. B. S.; Gomes, C. R. B.; Marques, I. P.; Faro, L. V.; Santos, F. C.;
Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P.; Souza, T. M. L.; Cunha, A. C.; Romeiro, G. A.; Ferreira, V. F.;
Souza, M. C. B. V. Lett. Drug Des. Discovery 2007, 4, 404; (b) Souza, T. M. L.;
Cirne-Santos, C. C.; Rodrigues, D. Q.; Abreu, C. M.; Tanuri, A.; Ferreira, V. F.;
Marques, I. P.; Souza, M. C. B. V.; Fontes, C. F. L.; Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P.; Bou-
Habib, D. C. Curr. HIV Res. 2008, 6, 209.
6. Souza, T. M.; Souza, M. C. B. V.; Ferreira, V. F.; Canuto, C. V.; Marques, I. P.;
Fontes, C. F.; Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P. Arch. Virol. 2007, 152, 1417.
7. (a) Deffin, G. F.; Kendall, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 893; (b) Snyder, H. R.;
Freier, H. E.; Kovacic, P.; Heyningen, E. M. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 371.
8. Tsuchiya, S.; Hiratsuka, K.; Yasuda, N.; Fukuzaki, A. Worldwide Patent, WO
92,21,658, 1992, 92 pp.
The effect on HIV replication was analyzed using PBMC initially
exposed to viral suspensions containing 5–10 ng/mL of HIV-1
p24Ag for 2–3 h. Cells were washed, resuspended in complete med-
ium, plated in 96-well culture plates (2 ꢁ 105 cells/well) in tripli-
cates, and treated with different concentrations of the compounds.
After 7 days at 37 °C in 5% CO2, viral replication was assessed by
measuring the HIV-1 p24Ag in culture supernatants by ELISA cap-
ture assay (ZeptoMetrix Co., Buffalo, NY). Viral replication was eval-
uated by measuring the HIV-1 p24Ag in culture supernatants.
4.3. Molecular modeling, SAR studies and in silico ADMET
screening
Initially, the structures were submitted to a conformational
analysis procedure available in the SPARTAN’06 software package
(Wavefunction Inc. Irvine, CA, 2000), using the MMFF94 force field.
The most stable conformers were submitted to a full geometry
optimization process, using the AM1 semiempirical Hamiltonian,
and, subsequently, to a single-point energy ab initio calculation,
at the 6–311G* level, both methods available in SPARTAN’06. The ste-
reoelectronic properties of all structures were evaluated in order to
perform structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies. Values of
HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) and LUMO (Lowest
Unoccupied Molecular Orbital) energy, molecular weight, volume,
and surface area, HOMO and LUMO orbital coefficients distribu-
9. He, J. F.; Yun, L. H.; Yang, R. F.; Xiao, Z. Y.; Cheng, J. P.; Zhou, W. X.; Zhang, Y. X.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2980.
10. (a) Al-Soud, Y. A.; Al-Masoudi, N. A. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2003, 14, 790; (b) Cunha,
A. C.; Figueiredo, J. M.; Tributino, J. L. M.; Miranda, A. L. P.; Castro, H. C.; Zingali,
R. B.; Fraga, C. A. M.; Souza, M. C. B. V.; Ferreira, V. F.; Barreiro, E. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2003, 11, 2051.
11. Lucero, B. A.; Gomes, C. R. B.; Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P.; Faro, L. V.; Alvarenga, L.; Souza,
M. C. B. V.; Souza, T. M. L.; Ferreira, V. F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1010.
12. Silva, F. C.; Souza, M. C. B. V.; Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P.; Castro, H. C.; Souza, S. L. O.;
Souza, T. M. L.; Rodrigues, D. Q.; Souza, A. M. T.; Abreu, P. A.; Passamani, F.;
Rodrigues, C. R. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 373.
13. Souza, T. M. L.; Rodrigues, D. Q.; Ferreira, V. F.; Marques, I. P.; Santos, F. C.;
Cunha, A. C.; Souza, M. C. B. V.; Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P.; Bou-Habib, D. C.; Fontes,
C. F. L. Curr. HIV Res. 2009, 7, 327.
14. Lipinski, A. C.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.
1997, 23, 3.
15. Lima, R. G.; Van, W. J.; Saraiva, E. M. B.; Barral-Netto, M.; Galvao-Castro, B.;
Bou-Habib, D. C. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 185, 1561.
tion, molecular dipole moment (l), and molecular electrostatic po-
tential (MEP) maps were calculated. MEP isoenergy surface maps
were generated in the range of ꢀ150.0 (deepest red color) to
+150.0 (deepest blue color) kJ/mol and superimposed onto a
molecular surface of constant electron density of 0.002 e/au3.12
In addition, descriptors such as cLog P (octanol/water partition
coefficient) and Log S (water solubility) were calculated using the
Osiris Property Explorer on-line system available at http://
The oxoquinoline derivatives were submitted to in silico AD-
MET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity)
screening, using the Osiris program. Values of druglikeness are
based on the occurrence frequency of each fragment of the mole-
cule in commercial drugs while the drug-score evaluates the com-
16. Scudiero, D. A.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Paull, K. D.; Monks, A.; Tierney, S.; Nofziger,
T. H.; Currens, M. J.; Seniff, D.; Boyd, M. R. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 4827.
17. Mosmann, T. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55.
18. Tekto, I. V. Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 1497.
19. Wenlock, M. C.; Austin, R. P.; Barton, P.; Davis, A. M.; Leeson, P. D. J. Med. Chem.
2003, 46, 1250.