QSARs for Protein Free Radical Formation
Chem. Res. Toxicol., Vol. 23, No. 5, 2010 881
the plate was washed and blocked overnight with 4% cold fish
gelatin, and anti-DMPO detection of MPO-DMPO was carried
out as described previously (1). The concentration of aniline
derivative necessary to induce a 2-fold increase above back-
ground for detection of the myeloperoxidase protein free radical
(MPO•) was designated the EC2 value.
Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy Detection of
Aniline Free Radical Metabolites. Free radical metabolites
were detected by electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy
using the spin-trapping technique (13). The spin trap we used
was MNP, which we previously found provided significant detail
for revealing the structure of the free radical that was formed
(1, 2). ESR spectra were recorded using an Elexsys E500
spectrometer (Bruker Biospin Ltd., Billerica, MA) using an ER
4122 SHQ cavity. The settings for most spectra were recorded
at 9.78 GHz, 100 kHz modulation field, 20 mW power, 0.4 G
modulation amplitude, 1024 points, and 6.32 × 105 receiver
gain. In certain cases where the spectra were not well resolved,
we used the following modifications to these settings: 1 mW
power, 0.07 G modulation amplitude, conversion time and time
constant of 2621.44 ms, 2048 data points, and 5368 s sweep
time. In order to generate free radical metabolites, we added
10 mM MNP, 5 mM aniline, 1.7 µM HRP, and 1 mM H2O2 in
200 µL buffer (described above), briefly vortexed the reaction,
and added it to a quartz flat cell for recording spectra. We chose
these concentrations based on preliminary experiments.
Physicochemical Parameters and QSAR Derivation. The
Hammett constant (σ) values were obtained from (14); lipo-
philicity (experimental values of the log octanol/water partition
coefficient, or log P) were retrieved from the ALOGPS 2.1
program (15); and ionization potential of the parent aniline (IP-
P), electron affinity of the parent aniline (EA-P), and ionization
potential and electron affinity of the corresponding phenyl
radical metabolites (IP-R, EA-R, respectively) were calculated
using MOPAC with PM3 parameters after molecular mechanics
geometry optimization (MM3/PM3) in Sybyl 7.1. Free radical
enthalpy of formation values has been previously calculated with
PM3 parameters (16). QSAR equations were derived using
SigmaPlot 11.0. Best subset regression was used to identify the
physicochemical parameter that best correlated with the EC2
values, and the inclusion of additional parameters was evaluated
to see whether or not they would improve the statistical
robustness of the equation.
Figure 1. a. Representative structures of compounds tested in the present
study. b. Phenyl radical metabolite involvement in MPO free radical
formation (MPO•). The dashed line from the cation radical indicates
possible involvement, but based on the results of this study, we propose
that the phenyl radical metabolite is more significantly involved in MPO•
formation.
between the detection of phenyl radicals formed from
aromatic amines and their ability to form protein free radicals
(shown in Figure 1b).
Experimental Procedures
Reagents. Human MPO was purchased from Athens Re-
search & Technology (Athens, GA) and was dissolved in 0.1
M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and dialyzed twice for 12 h each
time. MPO concentration was determined by its extinction
coefficient (178 mM-1 cm-1 at 429 nm) (11). Horseradish
peroxidase type VI (HRP, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO)
was desalted in a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare,
Waukesha, WI) prior to use and its concentration was deter-
mined by 102 mM-1 cm-1 at 402 nm. 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline
N-oxide (DMPO) was purchased from Alexis Biochemicals (San
Diego, CA), purified twice by vacuum distillation at room
temperature, and stored under argon atmosphere at -80 °C until
use. Hydrogen peroxide (30% v/v, H2O2, Fisher Scientific Co.,
Fair Lawn, NJ) was assayed by its extinction coefficient of 43.6
M-1cm-1 at 240 nm (12). All aniline compounds, 2-methyl-2-
nitrosopropane (MNP), and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) at
the highest grade available. MNP was dissolved in buffer (2
mg/mL), protected from light, sealed, and shaken overnight at
32 °C. Chelex-100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA)
was mixed with purified water overnight, and filtered before
use. Phosphate buffer used in experiments was mixed with
Chelex-100 resin overnight to remove metal contaminants, and
the resin was removed by vacuum filtration. Diethylenetriamine-
pentaacetic acid (100 mM) was included in the buffer to prevent
metal-catalyzed reactions.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and
MPO Protein Free Radical Detection. Ninety-six-well ELISA
plates (Greiner Labortechnik, Germany) were used to carry out
reactions in order to detect the DMPO-MPO adducts. These
reactions were carried out in buffer and contained 100 mM
DMPO, 100 µM H2O2, 50 nM MPO, and varying concentrations
of anilines. The reactants were mixed in 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes,
then 100 µL of this reaction was transferred to each of three
wells containing 200 µL water. This reaction was carried out
for 2 h in an Eppendorf Thermomixer R (Germany) at 37 °C
with mixing at 500 rpm. At the end of the incubation period,
Results
Aniline-induced MPO Free Radical Formation. The aniline
derivatives used in this study were assessed for their ability to
induce anti-DMPO detection (formation of MPO•) that was
2-fold greater than control levels (defined as the EC2 value).
As shown in Table 1, we were able to derive EC2 values for
most aniline compounds used in this study. The EC2 values
ranged from 2.4 µM to 733 µM. The most potent inducers of
protein free radical formation were 2,4-dimethylaniline and
4-ethylaniline, and the least potent was 2,6-dichloroaniline. We
were not able to derive EC2 values for p-anisidine, 3,4-
dimethoxyaniline, 2,4-dimethoxyaniline, and 3-nitro- or 2-nitro-
aniline because, for these compounds, there was no increase in
anti-DMPO detection significantly greater than the control found
in the concentration range between 0.1 µM - 500 µM of aniline
derivative. The physicochemical parameters were obtained as
described in the legend and Experimental Procedures. A
selection of representative structures from the current test set
in Table 1 is shown in Figure 1a.