ChemComm
Communication
further even if it was reacted for another 22 h, and ICP-AES reductive-deposition of palladium. This catalyst showed high
measurements showed that the Pd concentration was out of detec- activity in the catalytic formylation of amines by CO2–H2 under
tion limit. These results excluded the possible contribution of the mild conditions. The influence of the Al2O3 structure and the
leached palladium species. Moreover, the catalyst can be easily preparation method of catalysts on the catalytic performance
separated by centrifugation and can be reused three times without was also studied.
deactivation, and 83% yield was maintained (entry 23 and Table 1,
entry 1).
We thank the NSFC (21073208, 21203219 and 21173204) and
the CAS for financial support.
Furthermore, the gaseous phase was checked by GC-TCD after
the reaction of 1-methylpiperazine with CO2–H2 and the CO
concentration was out of the TCD test limit. So the formation
of CO should be negligible and the selectivity based on CO2
conversion should be >99%. If the formylation reaction was
performed with CO, the yield of the desired product was only
15%, suggesting that CO should not be the reaction intermediate.
Also we checked the catalytic performance of homogeneous
PdCl2 (2 mol%)/1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino) ethane (5 mol%)
but only o1% desired product was formed as determined by
GC-MS. So the catalytic behavior of Pd/Al2O3-NR-RD is unique.
Having a highly efficient catalyst in hand, we further explored
the formylation of various amines to examine the scope and
limitations of the current catalyst system, Table 1. By using
1-methylpiperazine and 1-ethylpiperazine as substrates, the reaction
proceeded successfully and furnished the desired products with
89–93% yields (entries 1 and 2). In addition, other cyclic secondary
amines, such as pyrrolidine, piperidine and 4-methylpiperidine,
were also converted into the formamides with 84–92% yields
under the optimized conditions (entries 3–5). Moreover, the steric
hindrance might decrease the reactivity of amine and the desired
product was obtained in 71% yield for the formylation of
2,6-dimethylpiperidine (entry 6). It should be mentioned that
morpholine, which has an oxygen on its ring, was also used and
96% yield was obtained (entry 7). Interestingly, the increase of
reaction sites on the ring did not reduce the reactivity of amine,
and piperazine was formylated with 79% yield (entry 8). Thus, it was
Notes and references
1 (a) C. Mandil, Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emissions,
IEA Publications, Paris, France, 2007; (b) K. M. K. Yu, I. Curcic,
J. Gabriel and S. C. E. Tsang, ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 893–899.
2 (a) M. Aresta, Carbon Dioxide as Chemical Feedstock, ed. M. Aresta,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2010, pp. 1–13; (b) C. D. Gomes, O. Jacquet,
C. Villiers, P. Thuery, M. Ephritikhine and T. Cantat, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2012, 51, 187–190; (c) K. Huang, C. L. Sun and Z. J. Shi, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2011, 40, 2435–2452; (d) T. Sakakura, J. C. Choi and H. Yasuda,
Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 2365–2387; (e) P. G. Jessop, F. Joo and C. C. Tai,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 2425–2442; ( f ) W. Wang, S. P. Wang,
X. B. Ma and J. L. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3703–3727.
3 (a) A. Behr and V. A. Brehme, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2002, 187, 69–80;
(b) F. L. Liao, Y. Q. Huang, J. W. Ge, W. R. Zheng, K. Tedsree, P. Collier,
X. L. Hong and S. C. Tsang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2162–2165;
(c) I. Kasatkin, P. Kurr, B. Kniep, A. Trunschke and R. Schlogl, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 7324–7327; (d) F. C. Meunier, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 4053–4054; (e) G. A. Olah, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2005, 44, 2636–2639; ( f ) S. Schimpf, A. Rittermeier, X. N. Zhang,
Z. A. Li, M. Spasova, M. W. E. van den Berg, M. Farle, Y. M. Wang,
R. A. Fischer and M. Muhler, ChemCatChem, 2010, 2, 214–222;
(g) D. Sperling, Energy, 2007, 28, 178–179; (h) X. W. Zhou, J. Qu,
F. Xu, J. P. Hu, J. S. Foord, Z. Y. Zeng, X. L. Hong and S. C. E. Tsang,
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1747–1749.
4 (a) B. M. Bhanage, S. Fujita, Y. Ikushima and M. Arai, Appl. Catal., A,
2001, 219, 259–266; (b) M. Honda, A. Suzuki, B. Noorjahan,
K. Fujimoto, K. Suzuki and K. Tomishige, Chem. Commun., 2009,
4596–4598; (c) F. Shi, Y. Q. Deng, T. L. SiMa, J. J. Peng, Y. L. Gu and
B. T. Qiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3257–3260; (d) M. Shi and
K. M. Nicholas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 5057–5058;
(e) R. Srivastava, M. D. Manju, D. Srinivas and P. Ratnasamy, Catal.
Lett., 2004, 97, 41–47; ( f ) J. S. Tian, J. Q. Wang, J. Y. Chen, J. G. Fan,
F. Cai and L. N. He, Appl. Catal., A, 2006, 301, 215–221; (g) M. Yoshida,
N. Hara and S. Okuyama, Chem. Commun., 2000, 151–152.
not surprising that the formylation of 1,3-di(piperidin-4-yl)propane 5 K. Weissermel and H. J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2003, p. 43.
6 (a) O. Jacquet, C. D. Gomes, M. Ephritikhine and T. Cantat, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 2934–2937; (b) O. Jacquet, C. D. Gomes,
was also realized with high yield (entry 9). Furthermore, 8-oxa-3-
azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline were con-
verted into the corresponding formamides smoothly with 83–86%
yields (entries 10, 11). The employment of other dialkyalmines, such
as Me2NH, Et2NH, Bu2NH and Oc2NH, led to excellent yields, too
(entries 12–15). Clearly, the yields of the formamides decreased with
the increase of the alkyl chain. Secondary aromatic amines were
proved to be active as well with 49% conversion and 37% yield of
PhMeNHCO. GC-MS analysis suggested that the major byproduct
was N,N-dimethyl aniline, which indicated that the existence of the
aromatic ring increased the hydrogenation of formyl groups and
formation of N,N-dimethyl substrates (entry 16). However,
two aromatic substituents on the nitrogen completely deactivated
diphenylamine and there was no observable product (entry 17). By
applying primary amines such as hexan-1-amine and aniline as
substrates, the reactivity was found to be low and only 18% and 10%
yields were obtained, respectively (entries 18–19).
M. Ephritikhine and T. Cantat, ChemCatChem, 2013, 5, 117–120;
(c) S. Itagaki, K. Yamaguchi and N. Mizuno, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,
2013, 366, 347–352.
7 (a) P. G. Jessop, Y. Hsiao, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1994, 116, 8851–8852; (b) P. G. Jessop, Y. Hsiao, T. Ikariya and
R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 344–355; (c) O. Kroecher,
R. A. Koeppel and A. Baiker, Chem. Commun., 1997, 453–454;
(d) F. C. Liu, M. B. Abrams, R. T. Baker and W. Tumas, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 433–434; (e) P. Munshi, D. J. Heldebrant,
E. P. McKoon, P. A. Kelly, C. C. Tai and P. G. Jessop, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2003, 44, 2725–2727; ( f ) M. Rohr, J. D. Grunwaldt and A. Baiker,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2005, 226, 253–257; (g) L. Schmid, A. Canonica
and A. Baiker, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 255, 23–33; (h) L. Schmid,
M. S. Schneider, D. Engel and A. Baiker, Catal. Lett., 2003, 88,
105–113.
8 (a) O. S. Joo, K. D. Jung, S. H. Han, S. J. Uhm, D. K. Lee and S. K. Ihm,
Appl. Catal., A, 1996, 135, 273–286; (b) O. Kroecher, R. A. Koeppel and
A. Baiker, Process Technol. Proc., 1996, 12, 91–96; (c) O. Kroecher,
R. A. Koeppel and A. Baiker, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1999, 140,
185–193; (d) O. Kroecher, R. A. Koeppel, M. Froba and A. Baiker,
J. Catal., 1998, 178, 284–298; (e) J. L. Liu, C. K. Guo, Z. F. Zhang,
T. Jiang, H. Z. Liu, J. L. Song, H. L. Fan and B. X. Han, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 5770–5772.
In conclusion, we have prepared a simple and efficient
Pd/Al2O3-NR-RD catalyst by depositing palladium on a shape
controllable Al2O3-NR support through a two-step process that
involves hydrothermal synthesis of Al2O3-NR followed by
9 X. C. Duan, T. Kim, D. Li, J. M. Ma and W. J. Zheng, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2013, 19, 5924–5937.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 189--191 | 191