D. Yancheva et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1016 (2012) 147–154
149
(3H, d, J = 6.8, CHCH3); 1.03 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, CHCH3). 13C NMR
(62.8 MHz, CDCl3): dC = 172.8 (COO); 167.9(CON); 60.9 (CHBr);
52.5 (OCH3); 48.6 (NCH); 32.5 (CMe2); 20.84, 18.3 (CMe2); 17.9
(CMe).
spectrometer at a resolution of 2 cmꢁ1 and 64 scans. The FT-IR
spectra in solid state (in KBr) of 3 and 5 were also measured.
2.3. NMR spectra measurements
2.1.1.2. Minor isomer. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): dH = 7.00 (1H, br
s, NH); 4.59 (1H, m, NCH); 4.31 (1H, d, J = 5.2, CHBr); 3.80 (3H, s,
OCH3); 2.40 (1H, m, CHO); 1.46 (3H, d, J = 7.2, NCHCH3); 1.08
(3H, d, J = 6.8, CHCH3); 1.01 (3H, d, J = 6.8, CHCH3). 13C NMR
(62.8 MHz, CDCl3): dC = 172.9 (COO); 167.8(CON); 60.6 (CHBr),
52.6 (OCH3), 48.7 (NCH); 32.4 (CMe2); 20.79, 18.4 (CMe2); 18.2
(CMe).
The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX250 spectrom-
eter in solvent CDCl3 using TMS as internal standard. The struc-
tures of the investigated compounds were elucidated with the
help of 1D and 2D (COSY, HMQC, HMBC) spectra. Standard Bruker
pulse sequences and software were used to record and process the
spectra.
2.4. Computations
2.1.2. Cyclization of 3 to 6-(propan-2-yl)-3-methyl-morpholine-2,5-
dione (5)
All theoretical calculations were performed using the Gaussian
09 package [33] of programs. Geometry and vibrational frequen-
cies of species studied were performed by analytical based gradi-
ent technique without any symmetry constraint. All the results
were obtained using the density functional theory (DFT), employ-
ing the B3LYP (Becke’s three-parameter non-local exchange [34]
and Lee et al. correlation [33]) potentials. In order to determine
the preferred geometry of the compound studied, a large number
of probable geometries of the neutral compound in keto form were
constructed taking into account the flexibility of the ring system
and the change-over to chair- and boat-conformations. For each
boat or chair ring conformation, all relevant combinations of axial
and equatorial positions of the 3- and 6-alkyl groups were studied.
In this way, four diastereoisomeric structures (3R,6R), (3R,6S),
(3S,6S), and (3S,6R), were optimized for each ring conformation.
Then the same procedure was applied for selecting the most prob-
able geometries for the enol form and anionic derivative. For a bet-
ter correspondence between experimental and calculated wave
values, we modified the results using the empirical scaling factors
(0.9688 for B3LYP/6-311++Gꢀꢀ), reported by Merrick and Radom
[35]. To establish the stability order for the neutral diastereoisomers
and anions in water and DMSO solution we used the Polarizable
Continuum Model (PCM) [36] on the same level of theory.
0.002 mol of methyl 2-(2-bromo-3-methylbutanamido)propan-
oate 3, dissolved in 2 ml abs. ethanol, and 3 ml 0.5 N NaOH were
mixed and cooled in ice. 0.3 ml 5 N NaOH were added and the mix-
ture was stirred for 2 h at 0 °C. The solution was acidified with
equimolar amount of 2.5 M H2SO4 (pH ꢂ 2), stirred for another
30 min, and extracted with 30 ml dichloromethane (3 portions of
10 ml). The combined organic layers were washed by brine, dried
over sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The evaporation yielded small amount of light yellow
oil which crystallized on being kept. The crude 6-(propan-2-yl)-
3-methyl-morpholine-2,5-dione 5 was purified by multiple recrys-
tallization from water–ethanol mixture (1:4).
6-(Propan-2-yl)-3-methyl-morpholine-2,5-dione (5): C8H13NO3,
M = 171.19; yield = 60%; m.p. 101–102 °C; IR (KBr), cmꢁ1: 3288,
3083, 2966, 2924, 2874, 2852, 1718, 1650, 1547, 1457, 1421,
1376, 1338, 1313, 1284, 1231, 1194, 1165, 1119, 1049, 927, 853,
646, 566.
The 1H spectra indicated the presence of a mixture of two dia-
stereomes in a 4:3 ratio.
2.1.2.1. Major isomer. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): dH = 7.33 (1H, d,
J = 8.2, NH); 4.59(1H, m, NCH); 4.31 (1H, d, J = 4.3, CHO); 2.36
(1H, m, CHMe2); 1.47 (3H, d, J = 7.2, NCHCH3); 1.05 (3H, d, J = 6.5,
OCHCH3); 1.00 (3H, d, J = 6.5, OCHCH3). 13C NMR (62.8 MHz,
CDCl3): dC = 175.6 (COO); 168.7(CON); 59.7 (CHO); 48.65 (NCH);
32.3 (CMe2), 20.57, 18.51 (CMe2); 17.8 (CMe).
2.5. Assay for in vitro antibacterial activity
The in vitro antimicrobial activity of 6-(propan-2-yl)-3-methyl-
morpholine-2,5-dione sample was tested against a panel of laboratory
control strains belonging to the American Type Culture Collection
Maryland, USA (except one, belonging to National Collection of Type
Cultures, see below). Antibacterial activity was evaluated against
two Gram-positive and three Gram-negative bacteria. Gram-
positive bacteria used were: Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 and Staphy-
lococcus aureus ATCC 6538 while Gram-negative bacteria utilized in
the assay were: Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC 9027 and Salmonella abony NCTC 6017.
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 6-(propan-2-yl)-
3-methyl-morpholine-2,5-dione, against tested bacteria was deter-
mined by using a broth microdilution method in 96 multi-well
microtitre plates [37]. After overnight cultivation, bacterial suspen-
sions were made in Mueller Hinton broth and their turbidity was
standardized to 0.5 McFarland. Dimethyl sulphoxide (10%, v/v
aqueous solution) was used to dissolve and to dilute sample. A se-
rial double dilution of the sample was prepared in 96 well micro-
2.1.2.2. Minor isomer. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): dH = 7.22 (1H, d,
J = 8.2, NH); 4.58 (1H, m, NCH); 4.33 (1H, d, J = 4.3, CHO); 2.37
(1H, m, CHMe2); 1.50 (3H, d, J = 7.2, NCHCH3); 1.06 (3H, d, J = 6.5,
OCHCH3); 1.01 (3H, d, J = 6.5, OCHCH3). 13C NMR (62.8 MHz,
CDCl3): dC = 175.7 (COO); 168.8(CON); 60.0 (CHO); 48.60 (NCH);
32.4 (CMe2); 20.60, 18.46 (CMe2); 17.6 (CMe).
2.1.3. Conversion of 3-methyl-6-(propan-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholine-
2,5-dione into anion (8)
The corresponding anion 8 was obtained by adding a DMSO-d6
solution of 6-(propan-2-yl)-3-methyl-morpholine-2,5-dione to ex-
cess of dry CD3ONa (CD3ONa was preliminary prepared by reacting
CD3OD (Merck, 99% at. enrichment) with Na). The reaction mixture
was filtered to remove the excess of solid CD3ONa. The filtered
solution was put immediately into a spectroscopic cell and the IR
spectra were recorded.
titre plates, using method of Sarker et al. [38].
A stock
2.2. IR spectra measurements
concentration was 33 mg/ml. The lowest concentration of the sam-
ple that inhibited visible growth was taken as the MIC value. To
determine minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC), broth was
taken from each well without visible growth and inoculated in
Mueller Hinton agar for 24 h at 37 °C. The lowest concentration
of the tested sample that killed 99.9% of bacterial cells was
evaluated as the MBC value. Two columns in each plate were used
Commercially available spectral quality tetrachlormethane,
chloroform, and DMSO-d6, were employed as solvents. The follow-
ing sample cells were used: 0.6 mm NaCl for tetraclormethane
(0.1 M) solution; and 0.125 mm CaF2 for DMSO-d6 (0.1 M)
solutions. All IR spectra were recorded on a Brucker Tensor 27 FT