Full Paper
kenyl tosylamide 22a was fully converted to afford pyrrolidine
23a (entry 1, Table 1). In the absence of NaI (i.e., with TMSCl
alone; entry 2), the starting material was recovered and none
of the hydroamination product was observed. When a stronger
silylating reagent (TMSOTf) was employed (entry 3), 47% con-
version to the hydroamination product was achieved after 2 h
at room temperature. We were pleased to find that using TMSI
gave complete conversion to the hydroamination product
after only 1 h (entry 4). Furthermore, a catalytic amount of
TMSI (0.2 equiv) could be used, which led to 97% conversion
of 22a in 4 h (entry 5). In contrast, TMSOTf and TMSBr were
sub-optimal when sub-stoichiometric amounts of these
reagents were employed, leading only to 21% and 30% con-
version, respectively, after 4 h (entries 6 and 7). Unfortunately,
the hydroamination conditions using 20 mol% of TMSI were
only specific for sulfonamides and not efficient for other amine
substrates.
Table 2. Effect of added water on conversion.
Entry
Water [equiv]
Conversion [%]
1
2
3
4
5
0
76
96
88
89
78
0.05
0.10
0.25
0.50
fact that “anhydrous” HI could catalyze this reaction under
milder conditions as compared to triflic acid. This difference is
not explained by relative acid strength, since triflic acid (pKa =
À12) is more acidic as compared to HI (pKa =À10). Moreover,
both triflic acid and HI are strong enough to fully protonate
the tosylamide (pKa of an alkyl tosylamidium ca. À6).[15] This
leveling effect should render both acid-catalyzed reactions
identical in rate, since the active acid in both cases is the
tosylamidium. However, this is not what was observed.
With the initially established conditions for the hydroamina-
tion of 22a in hand, we next turned to investigating the mech-
anism of this transformation. The addition of base either shut
down the reaction (0.2 equivalents triethylamine) or severely
retarded the rate (15% conversion after 20 h with 0.2 equiv
2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine). This suggested that the generation of
acid was vital to the success of this reaction. When HI (57% so-
lution in water) was used instead of TMSI, the reaction pro-
ceeded at a sluggish rate, indicating that in situ generation of
HI might not be the sole promoting factor (see Table 1,
entry 8). From these observations, we hypothesized that a
silylated amine intermediate could be responsible for the
milder reaction temperatures enjoyed by the TMSI-promoted
hydroamination relative to the triflic acid mediated conditions
identified by Hartwig.[13] TMSI could silylate the tosylamide,
thus generating an active ion pair that can participate in
a facile protonation of the alkene group. However, we did not
observe any silylated intermediates in the reaction mixture
when the reaction was conducted in CD2Cl2 and monitored by
1H NMR spectroscopy. We have also observed that for a mixture
of N-methyl tosylamide and TMSI, the equilibrium lies towards
the free tosylamide and TMSI as opposed to the silylated
tosylamide.
To further elucidate the differences between the triflic acid
and HI-mediated hydroaminations, we compared conversion at
room temperature in the presence of various additives. As
shown in Table 3, the conversion after 4 h was the same
Table 3. Additive effects.
Entry
Reagent
Additive (equiv)
Conversion [%]
1
2
3
TfOH
–
–
20
21
19
97
94
97
76
83
22
13
TMSOTf[a]
TfOH
HMDSO (0.2)
–
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TMSI[a]
TMSCl[a]
TMSI[a]
TMSOTf[a]
TfOH
NaI (0.2)
NaOTf (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaI (0.2)
NaBF4 (0.2)
Notably, the TMSI promoted conversion of 22a to 23a pro-
ceeded in a modest 76% conversion after 4 h when conducted
on gram scale. This decreased reaction rate upon scale-up sug-
gested that adventitious water could be playing an important
role. To test this hypothesis, a series of experiments was carried
out in which varying amounts of water were introduced. The
results are summarized in Table 2 and show that the addition
of 0.05 equivalents of water (entry 2) is optimal. It therefore
seems unlikely that TMSI is the active catalyst in this reaction;
rather, TMSI may serve as a precursor to generate HI and
hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) in the presence of trace water.
We believe that larger quantities of water retard the reaction
rate due to the Lewis basicity of the water oxygen atom (vide
infra). Thus, TMSI in the presence of small amounts of water
most likely serves as a source of ‘anhydrous’ HI.
TfOH
TfOH
NaBArF (0.2)
4
[a] Water (0.05 equiv) was also added to these reactions.
whether triflic acid or TMSOTf (in the presence of water; to
generate TfOH in situ) was used (entries 1 and 2). Similar ob-
servations were made for the reaction conducted in the pres-
ence of triflic acid and HMDSO (0.05 equiv, entry 3). These
comparisons indicate that HMDSO does not play a significant
role in the hydroamination.[16]
We next sought to ascertain the effect of the counter-anion
on the rate of the hydroamination reaction. The importance of
counter-anions is well documented in transition-metal-cata-
lyzed hydroaminations, with less coordinating anions (e.g., OTf,
OTs, and BAr4) generally increasing the catalytic activity of the
All evidence up to this stage pointed toward a Brønsted
acid catalyzed hydroamination, but we were intrigued by the
&
&
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1 – 8
4
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!