displaying sub- to low-nanomolar, broad MMP/ADAM
inhibitory activity.
The synthesis of 6 starts with the known compound 1.10a,11
Removal of the chiral auxiliary using lithium benzyl alco-
holate gave benzyl ester 2. Partial deprotection led to
monoester 3, the acyl chloride derivative of which was
reacted with N-Boc-O-TBS-hydroxylamine.12 Next, the ben-
zyl ester was removed by catalytic hydrogenation to obtain
free acid 5. It was soon discovered that 5 is not only labile
during storage (even at -20 °C) but also extremely base
sensitive. Attempts to precipitate it as several different
alkylammonium salts led to complete degradation. Also,
standard peptide coupling conditions (HCTU/iPr2EtN) led
to complicated reaction mixtures, presumably due to cy-
clization of 5 to the anhydride. Therefore, to minimize the
amount of base encountered by compound 5, it was decided
to prepare an active ester derivative, which can, in theory,
be coupled without additional base. The pentafluorophenyl
(PFP) ester 6, obtained by reaction of 5 with pentafluo-
rophenol under the influence of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-
N′-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC), proved to be far more stable
during storage than acid 5.
Because these compounds are peptide-like structures, it
would be highly convenient to be able to synthesize
functionalized derivatives using standard solid-phase peptide
synthesis (SPPS) procedures. Although many SPPS proce-
dures for C-terminal hydroxamic acids have been reported,6
there are very few SPPS methods for N-terminal succinyl-
hydroxamate peptides7,8 which obviate the handling of
advanced hydroxamate precursors such as carboxylic acids9
or esters.10 Therefore, we devised a building block that can
be used in a linear SPPS strategy, immediately leading to
products with R1 ) H. In this paper, we describe the novel
building block 6 (see Scheme 1) and its use in the synthesis
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Building Block 6
Next, the potential of PFP ester 6 in SPPS was evaluated
(see Scheme 2). Dipeptide 7a was synthesized on Rink amide
Scheme 2. Solid-Phase Synthesis of Succinylhydroxamate
Peptides Using 6
of inhibitors and functionalized probes for the study of MMP
and ADAM activities.
(3) Huovila, A.-P. J.; Turner, A. J.; Pelto-Huikko, M.; Ka¨rkka¨inen, I.;
Ortiz, R. M. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2005, 30, 413-422.
(4) For a recent overview, see: Verhelst, S. H. L.; Bogyo, M. QSAR
Comb. Sci. 2005, 24, 261-269.
resin using standard protocols. After removal of the Fmoc
group, several conditions for the coupling of 6 were
investigated.13 The optimal conditions proved to be shaking
the resin for 2 h with 5 equiv of 6 and 2 equiv of iPr2EtN
relative to the resin-bound peptide in NMP. The resulting
product was cleaved from the resin and concomitantly
deprotected using 95% aqueous TFA, cleanly yielding
peptide 8a in 64% yield after HPLC purification. In the same
fashion, the analogous peptides in which phenylalanine is
replaced by leucine (8b, 56% yield), tryptophan (8c, 42%
yield), and tyrosine (8d, 71% yield) were synthesized.
Enzyme inhibition tests using a fluorogenic substrate (see
Supporting Information) revealed IC50 values in the low
(5) Whittaker, M.; Floyd, C. D.; Brown, P.; Gearing, A. J. H. Chem.
ReV. 1999, 99, 2735-2776.
(6) See, for instance: (a) Mellor, S. L.; McGuire, C.; Chan, W. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3311-3314. (b) Sasubilli, R.; Gutheil, W. G.
J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 911-915. (c) Gazal, S.; Masterson, L. R.; Barany,
G. J. Pept. Res. 2005, 66, 324-332. (d) Yin, Z.; Low, K. S.; Lye, P. L.
Synth. Commun. 2005, 35, 2945-2950.
(7) Solid-phase strategies of marimastat analogues have been reported:
(a) Jenssen, K.; Sewald, K.; Sewald, N. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004, 15, 594-
600. (b) Barlaam, B.; Koza, P.; Berriot, J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 7221-
7232.
(8) During the preparation of this manuscript, a paper appeared reporting
the synthesis of a library of diastereomeric inhibitors with R ) H by using
an alternative, racemic building block with O-trityl protection: Wang, J.;
Uttamchandani, M.; Sun, L. P.; Yao, S. Q. Chem. Commun. 2006, 717-
719.
(9) For selected examples of hydroxamate solution syntheses from
carboxylic acids, see: (a) Reddy, A. S.; Kumar, M. S.; Reddy, G. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6285-6288. (b) Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu,
A.; Salaris, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2715-2717.
(10) For selected examples of hydroxamate solution syntheses from esters,
see: (a) Levy, D. E.; Lapierre, F.; Liang, W.; Ye, W.; Lange, C. W.; Li,
X.; Grobelny, D.; Casabonne, M.; Tyrrell, D.; Holme, K.; Nadzan, A.;
Galardy, R. E. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 199-223. (b) Ho, C. Y.; Strobel,
E.; Ralbovsky, J.; Galemmo, R. A., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4873-
4875.
(11) Auge´, F.; Hornebeck, W.; Decarme, M.; Laronze, J.-Y. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1783-1786.
(12) Altenburger, J. M.; Mioskowski, C.; d’Orchymont, H.; Schirlin, D.;
Schalk, C.; Tarnus, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5055-5058. Instead of
Et3N and DMAP for the coupling of the hydroxylamine to the acyl chloride,
we used 2 equiv of DMAP without Et3N because the acyl chloride of 3
appeared to be highly sensitive to tertiary amine bases.
(13) Five equivalents of 6 and no additional base gave incomplete, though
clean, coupling, and adding five equivalents of iPr2EtN resulted in complete
consumption of 7a but also substantial side reactions.
1706
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 8, 2006