Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 3 of 4
DOI: 10.1039/C7CC07148E
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
rotation barrier around the C-N bonds following the order Finally, we evaluated the effect of the substituents size in the
L2 L5 L8. The effect of the chalcogen on the binding modes receptors on the anion binding ability of selenoureas L1 L3, by
was also confirmed in the case of the symmetric diphenyl- using acetate as prototypical anion. The results are
substituted L1 L5, and L7 (see ESI, Fig. S5). summarised in Table 2 and in the stack plots in the ESI (Fig. S9
We then evaluated the role of the anion size and geometry on and S10).
the coordination modes of selenoureas L1 L3 by comparing
>
>
-
,
-
Table 2 Type of adducts observed for L1-L3 with acetate in DMSO-d6.
chloride, dihydrogenphosphate, acetate, and benzoate. Results
obtained for the prototypical case of L2 are summarised in
Table 1 and in the stack plots in the ESI (Fig. S6). Results for L1
and L3 are shown in Figs. S9 and S10, respectively.
Receptor
Mono-coordination
Bi-coordination
L1
L2
L3
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢀ
Table 1 Type of adducts observed for L2 with different anions in DMSO-d6.
Both in the case of the di-phenyl (L1) and phenyl-naphthyl (L2
)
Anion
Mono-coordination
Bi-coordination
substituted receptors, resonances corresponding to both
mono- and bi-coordinated adducts were observed, with the
difference in the total number of NH singlets simply due to the
symmetry of the receptor itself (Fig. S8a and S8b). Differently,
in the case of 1,3-dinaphtylselenourea L3 we observed only
the mono-coordinated species (Fig. S8c). In the light of all the
collected evidence, this difference is clearly due to the
increased steric hindrance provided by the two aryl
substituents, making the formation of the bi-coordinated
adduct particularly unfavourable. We performed 1H-NMR
Cl-
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
-
H2PO4
AcO-
BzO-
ꢁ
ꢁ
In the case of the relatively small and spherical chloride anion,
the usual progressive shift of the two selenourea NHs to higher
frequency was observed only at high anion equivalents added,
indicating a low binding affinity. No coalescence regime was
observed, while the resonance shift presumably reflected the
fast exchange rate between the free receptor and the bi-
coordinated adduct.
titrations also with receptors L4-L9 and all the anions
considered and we observed only the formation of the bi-
coordinated adducts. It is worth noticing that we did not
observed any relevant variation in the Uv-Vis and the
In the case of dihydrogenphosphate, after a first coalescence
regime the two signals reappeared in the spectrum but located
at lower frequency than those of the free receptor. Upon
addition of further increasing amounts of anion, the
progressive shift of the two NHs was observed, up to
frequency values higher than those observed for the free
receptor. This peculiar behaviour can be explained with a fast
exchange rate between the two possible mono-coordinated
species and the bi-coordinated adduct. The absence of
resonances in the 4.5-6.0 ppm range, characteristic of mono-
coordinated adducts, showed that the bi-coordinated species
is the dominating one, to which dihydrogenphosphate anion
can evolve very rapidly from any of the two mono-coordinated
forms. This is absolutely reliable if one considers the
tetrahedral geometry of the anion. The presence of four
oxygen atoms pointing to different directions should be able to
facilitate the second coordination event even if the receptor
adopts a “distorted” non-planar conformation.
fluorescent properties of receptors L1-L3 upon addition of the
anions investigated.
The results obtained can be summarised in a truth table (Table
3) where the input are i) the nature of the chalcogen (0, 1, 2
for oxygen, sulphur and selenium, respectively), ii) the steric
hindrance of the aryl substituents at the urea moiety (0, 1, and
2 for diphenyl, phenyl-naphtyl, and di-naphtyl, respectively),
and iii) the geometry of the anion (0, 1, 2, 3, for spherical
chloride, tetrahedral dihydrogenphosphate, Y-shape acetate,
and bulky Y-shape benzoate, respectively), while the output
1
are the type of adducts formed identified on the base of H-
NMR signals (0, 1, 2, for only mono-coordinated, both mono-
and bi-coordinated, and only bi-coordinated, respectively). It is
clear, that only selenoureas are able to give multiple response
depending on the anion and on the aryl substituents
considered. The output type in Table
3 can be easily
The observation of distinct resonances for both mono- and bi-
coordinated adducts in the case of the Y-shape anions acetate
and benzoate reflected the slower exchange rate between the
different species formed in solution. The bulky selenium atom
in the receptor should limit rotations around the C-N bonds,
thus limiting the accessible conformations. As a consequence,
the complementarity between the directionality of the two
NHs hydrogen bond donors and the Y-shape of these anions is
more difficult to be achieved when selenoureas are compared
to ureas and thioureas (see ESI, Fig. S7). The bulkier benzoate,
indeed, formed only one of the two possible mono-
coordinated adducts with L2 because of its increased steric
hindrance, which determined the preferential coordination
direction on the less cluttered phenyl side of the receptor.
determined using the flowchart in Fig. 3, which also provides
the basis to implement the automatic NMR spectral analysis
for the interactions of the receptors and anions investigated in
the paper.
In conclusion, we showed that when compared to ureas and
thioureas, selenoureas appear to be more versatile receptors
for anion binding, capable of forming at room temperature in
solution both mono- and bi-coordinated adducts depending on
the geometry of the bound anion and the steric hindrance
exerted by the chalcogen itself and the substituents on the
urea moiety. This is reflected also on the increase of the NMR
coalescence temperature that facilitate the easy detection of
the mono-coordinated adduct in solution at room
temperature. As
a
consequence, on using i) the steric
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins