2
S. Singh et al. / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
Table 1
O
Variation of reaction conditions for the synthesis of 3-phenyl-[1,4]oxathiepino
[5,6-b]pyridine-5-one 2a
O
O
O
OH
O
OH
OH
N
SH
O
Yielda (%) 6a
Yielda (%) 2a
Ar
Entry
Solvent
Base
Ar
4
Ar
N
S
N
S
N
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17b
18c
Methanol
Ethanol
DMF
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
55
45
85
87
85
74
87
90
78
65
89
87
35
40
55
62
82
—
Minor
—
—
Minor
8
Minor
Minor
6
OH
O
6
Br
6
2
Ar
5
DMSO
Scheme 1. Strategy for the synthesis of 1,4-oxathiepino[5,6-b]pyridine-5-one 2.
Methanol
Ethanol
DMF
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Pyridine
Pyridine
Pyridine
Pyridine
K2CO3
K2CO3
DMSO
Results and discussion
Methanol
Ethanol
DMF
5
Minor
10
Minor
—
—
—
—
Minor
90
It has been previously reported by us that the S-alkylation of
DMSO
thioamides can be very well executed using either inorganic base
9,10
Methanol
Ethanol
DMF
DMSO
DMSO
like K2CO3
or mild organic bases like Et3N.11,12 Under certain
circumstances alkyl analog of
a-bromo ketone results in thiazole
derivatives,11 while aromatic analogs lead to sulfide contraction
products.9 Unfortunately, the sulfide contraction reaction suffers
from relatively poor yields at low temperatures. Here, flow chem-
istry has played a vital role for overcoming this drawback. Even at
intensified process conditions the reaction can be very well con-
trolled by adjusting the flow rates (Fig. 1), temperatures, and pres-
sure in a facile manner.12
DMSO
a
b
c
Isolated yield after 30 min shaking at 80 °C.
The reaction time is 48 h.
2 equiva of phenacyl bromide was used.
For optimizing the reaction conditions for selective S-alkylation
of 2-mercaptonicotinic acid 4 we have chosen phenacyl bromide
5a as a model reactant. Initially we examined various solvent
systems and bases at 80 °C for 30 min to find the best reaction con-
ditions for S-alkylation (Table 1). Due to the poor solubility of
2-mercaptonicotinic acid in DCM, chloroform, DCE, dioxane, THF,
toluene, diethylether, and hexane these solvents were not optimal
for testing the optimization. In all of the optimization reactions
equimolar amounts of phenacyl bromide were used in order to
avoid further alkylation at carboxylic and nitrogen of pyridine that
could lead to a mixture of products. The reaction performance un-
der different conditions was investigated by LC–MS analysis. It was
observed that the expected sequence of S-alkylation and subse-
quent lactonization did not proceed under investigated conditions.
Instead of getting desired cyclic 2a we obtained the intermediate
6a (Scheme 1) as a major product in all the cases. However, it
was found that in case of DMSO as solvent and K2CO3 as base
(Table 1, entry 8), the S-alkylated intermediate 6a was formed in
quantitative yields. DMF, methanol, and ethanol and their combi-
nation with bases like Et3N, K2CO3, Na2CO3, and pyridine have also
furnished this intermediate 6a in moderate to low yields (Table 1).
The desired product 2a was observed only in trace amounts in
some cases. In a comparison between DMSO and DMF as the reac-
tion solvent, DMSO produced the reaction product in considerably
short reaction time than DMF. Therefore, we opted for the DMSO as
reaction solvent for further experiments.
ranging from 30 min to 48 h (Table 1, entry 17) and tuned the reac-
tion temperature from 60 to 120 °C but in no case the desired cycli-
zation was observed. The prolonged reaction time like 48 h at 80 °C
rather resulted in partial decomposition of the intermediate. We
have also attempted to activate the intramolecular cyclocondensa-
tion reaction under thermal intensified flow conditions at 240 °C
and 2.5 min residence time. But even this did not serve the pur-
pose. Finally, we found the solutions by converting corresponding
carboxylic acid to its analogous ester 7a (Scheme 2). This was sim-
ply achieved by using 2 equiv of phenacyl bromide (5a) inside of
1 equiv under similar conditions as described in Table 1 entry 18.
Periodic LC–MS analysis of the reaction revealed that the formation
of the dialkylated product was achieved within 15 min. Afterward,
the cyclization reaction took place and the dialkylated intermedi-
ate 7a has been converted to the cyclic derivative within the fol-
lowing 30 min and furnished the desired 2a.13 Additionally, no
side product due to alkylation of the pyridine N or thiazole forma-
tion has been observed in the LC–MS analysis. Moreover, after
acidic workup and extraction with DCM the desired product 2a
gets directly precipitated in acetone. This makes the method sim-
pler because additional chromatographic procedures can be
avoided.
In an independent experiment we have isolated the dialkylated
product 7a from the reaction mixture and the pure product was
subject to cyclization in DMSO without any base. To our surprise
The optimized reaction conditions for the synthesis of S-
alkylated intermediate 6a (Table 1, entry 8) of course led to clean
and high yielding product but the desired cyclization was only in
trace amounts. For achieving the cyclization, which is the second
step of the sequence, we have screened different reaction times
O
O
OH
OH
DMSO, 80
o
C, K2CO3, 1 eq. 5a
O
N
S
N
SH
6a
Ph
a
5
.
4
q
e
1
O
O
Ph
O
O
O
S
N
O
S
R
EtBr (1 eq.)
O
N
S
O
N
N
2
Ph
7a
O
O
O
O
S
O
OEt
O
Ph
N
S
7b
N
S
O
1,
Diltiazem
2a
3
Ph
Figure 1. Example structures containing analog of 1,4-oxathiepinone scaffold.
Scheme 2. Influence of ester substitution on conversion of 6a–2a.