Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 680–691.
9. Lallana, E.; Tirelli, N. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 143–158.
mamide as solvent. By changing the feed ratio of [CTA] to
[DEAAm] the solution properties were tunable. A linear
decrease of the cloud point with a decreasing degree of poly-
merization was observed. Aqueous polymer solutions showed
multiple-stimuli-responsive behavior.
10.Li, M.-H.; Keller, P. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 927–937.
11.Carampin, P.; Lallana, E.; Laliturai, J.; Carroccio, S. C.; Puglisi, C.;
Tirelli, N. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012, 213, 2052–2061.
12.Napoli, A.; Boerakker, M. J.; Tirelli, N.; Nolte, R. J. M.;
Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M.; Hubbell, J. A. Langmuir 2004, 20, 3487–3491.
The cloud points of the aqueous polymer solutions were tunable
by two different stimuli. The incorporated thioether linkages
were addressable by oxidation. The corresponding more
hydrophilic sulfoxides showed an increase of the cloud point
values up to almost 8 °C depending on the end-group and the
molecular weight of the polymer. Thus we were able to show
for the first time the influence of sulfur oxidation of polymer
bound end-groups on the solution properties in water. Simulta-
neously the cloud points were tunable by the addition of
RAMEB-CD. The cloud points of all polymers (8a–d, 9a–d)
could shift to a value of 33–34 °C in case of RAMEB-CD in
excess.
13.Schmaljohann, D. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2006, 58, 1655–1670.
14.Liu, H. Y.; Zhu, X. X. Polymer 1999, 40, 6985–6990.
15.Dimitrov, I.; Trzebicka, B.; Müller, A. H. E.; Dworak, A.;
Tsvetanov, C. B. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1275–1343.
16.Roy, D.; Brooks, W. L. A.; Sumerlin, B. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42,
17.de las Heras Alarcón, C.; Pennadam, S.; Alexander, C.
18.Plummer, R.; Hill, D. J. T.; Whittaker, A. K. Macromolecules 2006, 39,
19.Pietsch, C.; Schubert, U. S.; Hoogenboom, R. Chem. Commun. 2011,
Supporting Information
20.Jochum, F. D.; zur Borg, L.; Roth, P. J.; Theato, P. Macromolecules
A full experimental section can be found in the Supporting
Information. Description of the materials, characterization
methods and syntheses of the obtained compounds;
spectroscopic data (1H, 13C and 2D NMR); curves of the
turbidity measurements, Mayo-Plot for the determination of
the chain transfer constant.
21.Akiyama, H.; Tamaoki, N. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 5129–5132.
22.Narumi, A.; Fuchise, K.; Kakuchi, R.; Toda, A.; Satoh, T.;
Kawaguchi, S.; Sugiyama, K.; Hirao, A.; Kakuchi, T.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2008, 29, 1126–1133.
23.Kujawa, P.; Segui, F.; Shaban, S.; Diab, C.; Okada, Y.; Tanaka, F.;
Winnik, F. M. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 341–348.
Supporting Information File 1
Title Experimental part.
24.Schmidt, B. V. K. J.; Hetzer, M.; Ritter, H.; Barner-Kowollik, C.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 1306–1311.
25.Winnik, F. M.; Davidson, A. R.; Hamer, G. K.; Kitano, H.
26.Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2004–2021.
References
1. Lehn, J. M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1978, 50, 871–892.
2. Lehn, J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1304–1319.
27.Maatz, G.; Maciollek, A.; Ritter, H. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8,
3. Fischer, E. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1894, 27, 2985–2993.
28.Yu, B.; Chan, J. W.; Hoyle, C. E.; Lowe, A. B.
J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 3544–3557.
4. Watson, J. D.; Crick, F. H. C. Nature 1953, 171, 737–738.
5. Yamaguchi, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, R.; Takashima, Y.;
Hashidzume, A.; Harada, A. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, No. 603.
29.Li, H.; Yu, B.; Matsushima, H.; Hoyle, C. E.; Lowe, A. B.
30.Xia, Y.; Burke, N. A. D.; Stöver, H. D. H. Macromolecules 2006, 39,
6. Fleischmann, C.; Ritter, H. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34,
31.Matyjaszewski, K.; Xia, J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2921–2990.
7. Hu, P.; Tirelli, N. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 438–449.
32.Xia, Y.; Yin, X.; Burke, N. A. D.; Stöver, H. D. H. Macromolecules 2005,
8. Napoli, A.; Valentini, M.; Tirelli, N.; Müller, M.; Hubbell, J. A. Nat. Mater.
33.Hales, M.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Davis, T. P.; Stenzel, M. H. Langmuir
690