A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1
Lee and Batey
Figure 2. Palladium-catalyzed cyclization-induced rearrangement of allylic
imidates.13,14
phosphorimidates 3 (R4 ) OR).6 Our investigations were
inspired by the knowledge that reactions in which products
containing P(V)dO bonds are formed are often thermodynami-
cally favorable. There are many examples of reactions employ-
ing the conversion of P(III) to P(V)dO species, such as the
Wittig and Mitsunobu reactions. Similarly, the [2,3]-sigmatropic
rearrangement of allyl phosphites is a valuable approach to the
synthesis of allylphosphonates.7 Furthermore, thermal rear-
rangements of phosphorimidates to phosphoramides in which
formal [1,3]-alkyl migration from oxygen to nitrogen concomi-
tant with P(V)dN to P(V)dO interconversion have also been
described.8 The thermodynamic driving force of the phospho-
lidine-phosphoramide interconversion of 3 into 4 can be
estimated by considering the model system of (allyl-O)-
(NH2)2PdNH, which on [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement is
converted into (allyl-NH)(NH2)2PdO.9 The energy change for
this transformation is estimated at -24.4 kcal mol-1, calculated
at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. By comparison, the thermodynamic
driving force for the rearrangement of 1 into 2, as for the
transformation of the imidate (allyl-O)CHdNH into the amide
phoramidite can then readily undergo a room-temperature
Staudinger reaction11 with electron-deficient azides to generate
a phospholidine 3a. Metal-catalyzed [3,3]-sigmatropic 3-aza-
2-phospha-1-oxa-Cope12 rearrangement of 3a then generates
phosphoramide 4a, which can be deprotected under mild, acidic
conditions to give the transposed allylic amine 7. In contrast to
allylic imidates, this system contains two variable substituents
on phosphorus that could be used to control the reactivity and
selectivity of the rearrangement. In addition, the use of azides
in the Staudinger reaction allows the introduction of a range of
different nitrogen substituents.
We were particularly interested in the development of a metal-
catalyzed variant of the aza-phospha-oxa-Cope rearrangement.
Metal catalysts including Pd(II) and Hg(II) have been demon-
strated by Overman to catalyze the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrange-
ment of allylic imidates.3 Metal-catalyzed reaction of 1 is
believed to occur in a stepwise fashion, with Pd(II) first
activating the alkene to nucleophilic attack by the N-atom of
the imidate in a 6-endo-trig fashion, leading to a metal
intermediate 9 that then undergoes rapid breakdown to yield 2
(Figure 2). An analogous metal-catalyzed process for the
rearrangement of 3 into 4 would allow the use of lower reaction
temperatures and permit the use of more sensitive substrates.
Moreover, the use of a chiral metal catalyst would, in principle,
allow the development of an asymmetric variant of the reaction.
Indeed, at the outset of our investigations, there had been
increasing interest in the use of chiral Pd(II) catalysts for
enantioselective allylic imidate Overman rearrangements.13 Early
catalysts, although high yielding and highly selective, were
plagued by limitations of the substrates to N-aryl imidates. The
enantioselective rearrangement of substrates containing readily
deprotected N-functionality has only recently been accomplished
with various chiral cobalt oxazoline palladacycles (COP-X)
10, a culmination of several generations of axially chiral
(allyl-NH)CHdO, is estimated at -17.1 kcal mol-1
.
We now report a full study on the development of a metal-
catalyzed aza-phospha-oxa-Cope rearrangement of 3 into 4,
detailing the scope of the reaction, auxiliary-based diastereo-
selective rearrangement, and the use of chiral catalysts to
accomplish enantioselective rearrangement. The overall strategy
employs allylic alcohols 5 as substrates, compounds that are
commonly used as synthetic precursors, and for which there
are numerous methods developed for their synthesis.10 Nucleo-
philic substitution of 5 on an appropriate P(III) reagent then
gives phosphoramidite 6 (Scheme 1). The electron-rich phos-
(6) (a) Chen, B.; Mapp, A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5364-5365. (b)
Chen, B.; Mapp, A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6712-6718.
(7) Janecki, T.; Bodalski, B. Synthesis 1990, 799-801.
(8) (a) Challis, B. C.; Frenkel, A. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972,
303-308. (b) Challis, B. C.; Challis, J. A.; Iley, J. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1978, 813-818. (c) Mastryukova, T. A.; Mashchenko, N. V.;
Odinets, I. L.; Petrovskii, P. V.; Kabachnik, M. I. Russ. J. Gen. Chem.
1988, 58, 1756-1761. (d) Cabrita, E. J.; Afonso, C. A. M.; Gil de Oliveira
Santos, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1455-1467.
(9) Geometry optimizations, single-point energies, and vibrational analysis were
calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. Calculations were performed using
Spartan’04 Version 1.0, Wave function Inc., Irvine, CA.
(11) Gololobov, Y. G.; Kasukhin, L. F. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1353-1406.
(12) Classification based on the allylic imidate rearrangement described in:
Vo¨gtle, F.; Goldschmitt, E. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 1-40.
(10) There are numerous synthetic methods for the formation of enantioenriched
allylic alcohols. Resolution of allylic alcohols: (a) Drauz, K.; Waldmann,
H. Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: A ComprehensiVe Handbook,
2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002; Vols. I-III. (b) Pa`mies,
O.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3247-3261. (c) Carlier, P. R.;
Mungall, W. S.; Schro¨der, G.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 2978-2979. (d) Choi, J. H.; Choi, Y. K.; Park, E. S.; Kim, E. J.;
Kim, M.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1972-1977. Asymmetric reduction
of enones and ynones: (e) Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
2008-2022. (f) Itsuno, S. Org. React. 1998, 395-576. Synthesis of
enantioenriched propargylic alcohols and subsequent reduction: (g) Anand,
N. K.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9687-9688. (h)
McKew, J. C.; Kurth, M. J. Org. Proc. Proc. Int. 1993, 25, 125-130.
Asymmetric addition to unsaturated aldehydes: (i) Soai, K.; Niwa, S. Chem.
ReV. 1992, 92, 833-856.
(13) (a) Calter, M.; Hollis, T. K.; Overman, L. E.; Ziller, J.; Zipp, G. G. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 1449-1456. (b) Hollis, T. K.; Overman, L. E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 8837-8840. (c) Uozumi, Y.; Kazuhiko, K.; Hayashi, T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1065-1072. (d) Cohen, F.; Overman,
L. E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3213-3222. (e) Jiang, Y.;
Longmire, J. M.; Zhang, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1449-1450. (f)
Donde, T.; Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2933-2934. (g)
Leung, P.-H.; Ng, K.-H.; Li, Y.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 2435-2436. (h) Kang, J.; Yew, K. H.; Kim, T. H.; Choi,
D. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9509-9512. (i) Kang, J.; Kim, T. H.;
Yew, K. H.; Lee, W. K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 415-418. (j)
Anderson, C. E.; Donde, Y.; Douglas, C. J.; Overman, L. E. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 648-657.
9
14888 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 42, 2005