4
Tetrahedron Letters
emissive 1π–π* transition becomes the most probable transition
derivative 4c can be considered as a potential environment
state over the n–π* transition which results in concomitant
enhancement of the emission intensity. Now, in case of methanol
which is a polar as well as strong H-bonding donor solvent
therefore strongly interact with the lone pair electron of the
nitrogen atom, and therefore greatly stabilized the lone pair
sensitive fluorophore (Supporting Information).
In summary, a highly efficient and regioselective intramolecular
aza-cyclisation for pyrrole and fluorescent isoquinoline
derivatives has been developed on alkenyl or alkynyl
carbaldehydes using NaN3/NH4Cl. The reagent system was found
to be mild, air stable, metal free and thus provided a greener
alternative to heterocyclic ring synthesis. Moreover, the aza-
cyclisation was successfully applied to a short access of the core
structure of naturally occurring lamellarin Q. Further application
of this methodology for the synthesis of other heterocycles and
more complex alkaloid scaffolds are underway.
1
electron on N atom and thereby n–π* excited state energy
increases in higher extent and consequently inversion in energy
level of the excited states has been taken place and the emissive
1π–π* becomes the LUMO along with H-bonding may also lower
the solvent relaxation processes which finally results in strong
red shifting of the emission spectra. Further, to better understand
the effect of hydrogen bonding interaction on the fluorescence
properties of the compound 4c, the emission spectra of 4c were
recorded in acetonitrile–water binary mixtures (Fig 1b).
Acknowledgement
Financial support from DST (SB/FT/CS-189/2012) and
chemistry department of Bidhannagar College is gratefully
acknowledged.
(b)
(a)
References and notes
1.
(a) Clive, D. L. J.; Cheng P. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 5067-5078; (b)
Shinohara, K.-I.; Bando, T.; Sugiyama, H. Anti-Cancer Drugs
2010, 21, 228–242; (c) Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo,
L.; Pettersson, H. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663; (d) Bellina,
F.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7213–7256; (e) Kletsas, D.; Li,
W.; Han, Z.; Papadopoulos, V. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 67,
1927–1932; (f) Mach, U. R.; Hackling, A. E.; Perachon, S.; Ferry,
S.; Wermuth, C. G.; Schwartz, J.-C.; Sokoloff, P.; Stark, H. Chem-
Bio-Chem. 2004, 5, 508–518; (g) Muscarella, D. E.; O’Brian, K.
A.; Lemley, A. T.; Bloom, S. E. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 73, 66–73.
Fig.1 (a) Fluorescence spectra of 4c (4× 10-5 M) in different solvent
[λext=257nm]. (b) Fluorescence emission changes of 4c (4× 10-5 M) in CH3CN
and in increasing percentage of water in CH3CN [λext=257nm].
2.
a) Roth, B. D. Prog. Med. Chem. 2002, 40, 1–22; b) Chong, P. H.;
Seeger, J. D. Pharmacotherapy 1997, 17, 1157–1177; c) Deidda,
D.; Lampis, G.; Fioravanti, R.; Biava, M.; Porretta, G. C.; Zanetti,
S.; Pompei, R. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 3035–3037;
d) Biava, M.; Fioravanti, R.; Porretta, G. C.; Deidda, D.; Maullu,
C.; Pompei, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2983–2988; e)
Yee, N. K.; Nummy, L. J.; Byrne, D. P.; Smith, L. L.; Roth, G. P. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 326–330 and references therein; f) Pereira, E.
R.; Belin, L.; Sancelme, M.; Prudhomme, M.; Ollier, M.; Rapp, M.;
Seve`re, D.; Riou, J.-F.; Fabbro, D.;Meyer, T. J. Med. Chem. 1996,
39, 4471–4477.
It observed that on the addition of increasing amounts of water
the fluorescence intensity of the compound 4c at 371 nm was
gradually decreases with a simultaneous appearance of a new
peak at 504 nm as well as concomitant increase in emission
intensity and reaches a maximum in a 80% water which can be
attributed to the protonation of the “N” atom to results in the
formation of isoquinolium cation. The calculated fluorescence
quantum yield of compound 4c in different solvent system
clearly showed that the solvent polarity plays an important role in
deciding the emissive properties of the compound 4c (Table 4).
3.
4.
Quesada, A. R.; Gravalos, M. D. G.; Puentes, J. L. F. Br. J. Cancer
1996, 74, 677–682.
Table 4. Fluorescence quantum yields of compound 4c (Φ) in
different solvents
(a) Nishiyama, Y.; Moriyasu, M.; Ichimaru, M.; Iwasa,K.; Kato, A.;
Mathenge, S. G.; Chalo Mutiso, P. B.; Juma, F. D. Phytochemistry
2004, 65, 939–944; (b) Kohno, J.; Hiramatsu, H.; Nishio, M.;
Sakurai, M.; Okuda, T.; Komatsubara, S. Tetrahedron 1999, 55,
11247-11252; (c) Dembitskya,V. M.; Gloriozovab, T. A.; Poroikov,
V. V. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 183–202; (d) Salminena, K. A.;
Meyerb, A.; Jerabkovaa, L.; Korhonena, L. E.; Rahnastoa, M.;
Juvonena, R. O.; Immingb, P.; Raunioa, H. Phytomedicine 2011,
18, 533–538.
a
Solvent
λmax (nm)
λem
(nm)
Stokes shift
(b-a)c
(φF)d
b
Acetonitrile
257
257
368
112
0.24
0.20
Dichloromethane
363
357
365
360
351
487
106
100
108
103
94
Ethyl acetate
Chloroform
Tetrahydrofuran
Hexane
257
257
257
257
262
0.17
0.16
0.14
0.05
0.10
5.
6.
(a) Parisot, D.; Devys, M.; Barbier, M. J. Antibiot. 1989, 42, 1189–
1190; (b) Jacobs, J.; Kesteleyn, B.; Kimpe, N. D. Tetrahedron
2008, 64, 4985–4992.
Methanol
225
(a) Durola, F.; Sauvage, J.-P.; Wenger, O. S. Chem. Commun.
2006, 171–173; (b) Sweetman, B. A.; Mu¨ller-Bunz, H.; Guiry, P.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4643–4646; (c) Lim, C. W.; Tissot,
O.; Mattison, A.; Hooper, M. W.; Brown, J. M.; Cowley, A. R.;
Hulmes, D. I.; Blacker, A. J.Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 379–
384; (d) Alcock, N. W.; Brown, J. M.; Hulmes, G. I. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1993, 4, 743–756.
aMolar absorption coefficient at the maximum absorption wavelength.
c
bMaximum emission wavelength. Difference between maximum absorption
wavelength and maximum emission wavelength. dFluorescence quantum
yield (257 nm for all solvent except MeOH, for MeOH λext= 262 nm, error
limit within ± 5%).
The above photophysical study revealed that the compound 4c
exhibits strong fluorescence with moderate quantum yield.
Interestingly the fluorescence properties were found to be highly
sensitive to the solvent in terms of their polarity, hydrogen
bonding ability and pH of the medium. Thus, the isoquinoline
7.
(a) Jacobi, P. A.; Buddhu, S. C.; Fry, D.; Rajeswari, S. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 2894; (b) Portevin, B.; Tordjman, C.; Pastoureau,
P.; Bonnet, J.; Nanteuil, G. D. J. Med . Chem. 2000, 43, 4582; (c)
Jacobi, P. A.; Buddhu, S. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4823; (d)
May, D. A.; Lash, T. D. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4820; (e) Peterlin,