Communication
ChemComm
using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) as the radical trap- Scaffolding, and by a Grant from the Nippon Sheet Glass
ping reagent. The ESR signal for the carbon-centered radical Foundation (HAKF541800).
trapped by DMPO (g = 2.006, AN = 14.7 G, AH = 21.2 G) was
observed during the photocatalytic reaction (Fig. S3, ESI†). Under
this condition, DMPO fully inhibited the product formation (entry
Conflicts of interest
11 in Table 1), which implied a radical pathway for the coupling
reaction. Substituent effects on the phenyl ring of the phenethyl
There are no conflicts to declare.
radical for products 1e and 1f in Table 2 could be explained by the
Notes and references
decreasing electron density of the substrate radical, which under-
‡ Bulky t-butyl bromide and (1-bromoethyl)benzene provided no
went a nucleophilic attack on the alkyne. To elucidate the final step
desired cross-coupling product with A1.
for the alkyne formation from radical E in Scheme 3 or I in
Scheme 4a, the formation of hydrogen gas was analyzed by GC,
and no hydrogen gas was detected by GC after the reaction (Fig. S4,
ESI†), which excludes the b-elimination of radical E. Also no
deuterium isotopic effect was observed for the deuterated phenyl-
acetylene (A1–d), and 1a was formed in 85% yield (Scheme 4b),
which is similar to the standard conditions.8 Therefore, C–H bond
cleavage on A1 is not the rate-determining step in the reaction.
Finally, on–off light experiments were conducted to explore the
radical propagation mechanism. A clear light dependence was
observed for the reaction and radical propagation was unlikely.
Based on these experiments, the B12 catalyzed coupling reaction
should proceed by the mechanism as shown in Scheme 3. Radical E
should be oxidized to form carbocation F by the excited state of PS
(E(L*/LÀ) = 0.70 V vs. SCE in CH3CN for P1)8 and the energetically
preferred deprotonation of F to form the final product. To help
understand the deprotonation of the carbocation by i-Pr2NEt, we
performed DFT calculations using the B3LYP functional combined
with the 6-31G** basis. All the calculated energies and optimized
structures are summarized in the ESI,† and the DFT calculations
support the proposed mechanism of the energetically preferred
deprotonation step (Fig. S28, ESI†).
§ A nitro-substituent on the phenyl ring of A1 provided no desired
cross-coupling product with B1.
¶ The rate constant for the electron transfer between the photoexcited
P1 (P1*) and i-Pr2NEt is 7.0 Â 108 MÀ1
s
À1, while the electron transfer
from P1* to C1 is not observed. See ref. 8a.
8 Time courses of reactions are shown in Fig. S27 (ESI†).
1 (a) C. C. C. Johansson Seechurn, M. O. Kitching, T. J. Colacot and
V. Snieckus, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5062–5085;
(b) E. Negishi and L. Anastasia, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 1979–2017.
´
2 (a) R. Chinchilla and C. Najera, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5084–5121;
(b) K. Sonogashira, J. Organomet. Chem., 2002, 653, 46–49.
3 (a) M. Ociepa, J. Turkowska and D. Gryko, ACS Catal., 2018, 8,
11362–11367; (b) A. R. Hajipour, F. Rezaei and Z. Khorsandi, Green
Chem., 2017, 19, 1353–1361; (c) M. Karak, L. C. A. Barbosa and
G. C. Hargaden, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 53442–53466.
4 (a) G. Altenhoff, S. Wu¨rtz and F. Glorius, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47,
2925–2928; (b) M. Eckhardt and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 13642–13643; (c) Z. Wang, T. Zheng, H. Sun, X. Li, O. Fuhr and
D. Fenske, New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 11465–11470.
5 (a) A. Hazra, M. T. Lee, J. F. Chiu and G. Lalic, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2018, 57, 5492–5496; (b) W. Liu, Z. Chen, L. Li, H. Wang and C.-J. Li,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2016, 22, 5888–5893; (c) W. Liu, L. Li and C.-J. Li, Nat.
Commun., 2015, 6, 6526–6531.
6 L. Chen, Y. Hisaeda and H. Shimakoshi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2019,
361, 2877–2884.
7 See reviews: (a) D. Staveness, I. Bosque and C. R. Stephenson, Acc.
Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 2295–2306; (b) N. A. Romero and D. A. Nicewicz,
Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10075–10166; (c) C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic and
D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 5322–5363; (d) Y. Xi, H. Yi
and A. Lei, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 2387–2403.
8 (a) H. Tian, H. Shimakoshi, T. Ono and Y. Hisaeda, ChemPlusChem,
2019, 84, 237–240; (b) H. Tian, H. Shimakoshi, G. Park, S. Kim,
Y. You and Y. Hisaeda, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 675–683.
9 Concept of the dual catalyst in photochemical synthesis, see:
(a) M. Parasram and V. Gevorgyan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46,
6227–6240; (b) J. J. Devery III and C. R. J. Stephenson, Nature, 2015,
519, 42–43; (c) K. L. Skubi, T. R. Blum and T. P. Yoon, Chem. Rev.,
2016, 116, 10035–10074; (d) H. Shimakoshi, M. Nishi, A. Tanaka,
K. Chikama and Y. Hisaeda, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6548–6550.
In summary, we have developed a visible light-driven cou-
pling reaction of alkyl halides with phenylacetylene derivatives
for C(sp3)–C(sp) bond formation. An efficient reaction system
by the dual catalyst under mild conditions was conducted. The
B12 complex worked as an excellent catalyst with a high turn-
over under light irradiation. On-going work in our laboratory is
focused on the application of the dual catalyst to develop
various organic synthesis methods with a green procedure.
This study was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for 10 D. M. Arias-Rotondo and J. K. McCusker, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45,
5803–5820.
Scientific Research (B) (JP19H02735) from the Japan Society
for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI Grant Number
11 See reviews: (a) M. Giedyk, K. Goliszewska and D. Gryko, Chem. Soc.
¨
Rev., 2015, 44, 3391–3404; (b) K. Gruber, B. Puffer and B. Krautler,
JP18H04265 in Precisely Designed Catalysts with Customized
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 4346–4363.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 13070--13073 | 13073