48
H. Zhang / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 756 (2014) 47e51
Table 1
R
Optimization of reaction conditions for the arylation of 6-phenylthiazolo[3,2-b]-
1,2,4-triazole with iodobenzene.a
F
Ph
Ph
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
cat. base
solvent
SO2Me
N
N
+
Cl
N
I
Ph
S
S
S
S
N
Cl
3a
1a
2a
R
NO2
Entry
Catalyst (mol%)
Base
Solvent
T (ꢀC)
Yield (%)b
N
N
N
N
N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
RuCl3(H2O)n
RuCl2(PPh3)3
Ru3(CO)12
Ru(acac)2
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
Ru3(CO)12
e
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
K2CO3
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMF
DMSO
NMP
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
140
160
100
140
42
13
38
64
20
67
76
53
37
42
68
65
84
45
41
87
86
55
ec
PhSO2
S
S
Fig. 1. Thiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazole derivatives with biological activities.
Cs2CO3
KH2PO4
t-BuONa
KOAc
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
phenylthiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazole 1a with iodobenzene 2a. A
variety of Ruthenium-catalysts in conjunction with different ba-
ses, solvents and temperatures were tested and the results were
described in Table 1. To our delight, the desired product 5,6-
diphenylthiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazole 3a was formed in the
presence of [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 and Na2CO3 in DMA at 120 ꢀC for
12 h. After this, other Ruthenium catalysts, such as RuCl3(H2O)n,
RuCl2(PPh3)3, Ru3(CO)12 and Ru(acac)2, were also employed in
reaction and the corresponding arylation product 3a was ob-
tained in 13%, 38%, 64% and 20% yields respectively (Table 1, en-
tries 2e5). The results indicated that Ru3(CO)12 was the most
efficient catalyst in this reaction. Next, the effects of bases were
also tested in this arylation (Table 1, entries 6e10). Among a va-
riety of inorganic bases, Cs2CO3 was proved to be the most suit-
able in present of Ru3(CO)12 in DMA at 120 ꢀC. However, relative
lower yields were obtained when the other bases were used, such
as K2CO3, KH2PO4, t-BuONa and KOAc. We next attempted to
improve the yields by using various solvents. As entries 11e15 of
Table 1 indicated, NMP was the most effective media for this
arylation process. The effects of temperature was also detected
(Table 1, entries 16e18) and it was evident that 140 ꢀC was the
most optimal one for this Ru3(CO)12-catalyzed arylation. Finally,
the control experiment results showed that product 3a was not
formed in the absence of Ru3(CO)12 by using Cs2CO3 as bases in
NMP at 140 ꢀC.
With the optimized conditions in hand, that is, thiazolo[3,2-
b]-1,2,4-triazoles (0.5 mmol), aryl iodides (0.7 mmol), Ru3(CO)12
as the catalyst, Cs2CO3 as the bases and NMP as the solvent, we
next turned our attention to the scope of the Ruthenium-
catalyzed direct arylation of thiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazoles with
aryl iodides. As shown in Table 2, 6-substituted thiazolo[3,2-b]-
1,2,4-triazoles were examined and the results showed that a
variety of aryl iodides with either electron-donating or electron-
withdrawing groups attached to the benzene rings, were able to
undergo arylation smoothly and generated the corresponding
products in good yields (3ae3o). As expected, the group (CF3) on
the phenyl ring of aryl iodides was compatible under this
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
1,4-dioxane
Toluene
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (0.7 mmol), catalyst (3 mol%), base
(1.0 mmol), solvent (2 mL), 100e160 ꢀC, 12 h.
b
GC yields.
No product.
c
process, and the corresponding product was isolated in 80e81%
yields. In addition, bromobenzene as a substrate was tested
and the desired product was formed in 80% yields. All these
cases showed high functional group tolerance (CH3, F, Cl, Br, CF3)
for the arylation. Pleasingly, all reactions were very clean,
and the sole arylation products were obtained with highly
regioselective at C-5 position under our standard experimental
conditions.
Subsequently, we were interested in evaluating the scope of
this Ru3(CO)12-catalyzed arylation by using 2,6-disubstituted
thiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazoles as substrates and the results
showed in Table 3. The reaction conditions had proven to be useful
for a range of 2,6-disubstituted thiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazoles. The
reaction of 2,6-disubstituted thiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazoles with
differently substituted on the phenyl ring of aryl iodides, such as 4-
CH3, 2-CH3, 2-F, 3-Cl and 4-CF3, had a beneficial effect on the re-
action outcomes, and in most cases the corresponding arylation
products were obtained in good yields under the previously
optimized conditions. These results indicated that all of the aryl
iodides, regardless of their electronic or steric properties, pro-
ceeded smoothly in good yields to afford the expected arylation
products.
A
proposed mechanism of the direct arylation could be
described in Scheme 2. A mechanism similar to those of previous
arylation of heterocycles may be involved for the present reaction.
First, Ru3(CO)12 reacted with aryl iodides to form Ru-complexes A
which directed electrophilic attack on 1a to generate the inter-
mediate B. Subsequently, the deprotonation of intermediate B with
the help of Cs2CO3 would give intermediate C, which would then
undergo reductive elimination to form the 3 and release the Ru
catalyst.
R
R
R1
N
N
R1
N
N
Ru. Base
Solvent
N
N
+
I
R2
R2
S
S
Scheme 1. Ru-catalyzed arylation of thiazolo[3,2-b]-1,2,4-triazole with aryl halide.