Y.-T. Chang and Y.-H. Ahn
FULL PAPER
ture to a solution of 4 (1mg, 2 mmol) in acetonitrile (1mL). The reaction
mixture was analyzed by HPLC-MS.
Preparation of the thermodynamic product (1): DBU (600 mL, 3.9 mmol)
was added to
a solution of 4 (30 mg, 0.061mmol) in acetonitrile
(600 mL). After the reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h, boric acid
(60 mg, 0.96 mmol) in DMSO (0.5 mL) was added to the reaction mix-
ture. To accelerate the rate of amplification, the reaction mixture was
concentrated to about 60 mL, and stirred for 2 d. The reaction mixture
was quenched by acetic acid (1mL), diluted with ethyl acetate, washed
with 1n HCl, aq. NaHCO3, and brine. The organic layer was dried over
MgSO4, concentrated, and purified by chromatography on silica gel
(EtOAc/Hex 1:1) to give 1 (25 mg, 83%). Rf = 0.30 (EtOAc/Hex 1:1);
1H NMR (CD3OD): d
= 3.89 (t, J=9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (dd, J=2.9,
10.0 Hz, 2H), 5.57 (t, J=9.7 Hz, 2H), 5.77 (t, J=2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.26 8.15
Figure 7. Direct migration to 7 and 1 using phenyl boronic acid without
pre-equilibrium. Reaction conditions: I(1,4,5)Bz3 (4) (1mg), phenyl bor-
onic acid (3.7 mg, 15 equiv) in acetonitrile (1 mL), and then DBU (20 mL,
(m, 15H); LC-MS: m/z: 493 [M+H]+, 475 [MÀH2O+H]+.
Preparation of the kinetic product (7): Phenyl boronic acid (113 mg,
0.96 mmol), and DBU (600 mL, 3.9 mmol) was added to a solution of 4
(30 mg, 0.061mmol) in acetonitrile (30 mL). After the solution was stir-
red for 1h, the reaction mixture was quenched by acetic acid (1mL), and
diluted with ethyl acetate, and washed with 1n HCl, aq. NaHCO3, and
brine solution. The resulting organic layer was dried over MgSO4, con-
centrated, and purified by chromatography on silca gel (EtOAc/Hex 1:2)
~
*
66 equiv) where t=0 at that point, : I(2,4,6)Bz3 (1), : I(1,4,6)Bz3 (7).
(1) on silica gel after its amplification of up to 94% afforded
the 83% recovery of 1. The isolation of kinetic product (7)
that is amplified with up to 98% from the direct migration
without pre-equilibrium led to the 92% recovery of 7.
to give
7 (27.5 mg, 92%). Rf =
0.37 (EtOAc/Hex 1:1); 1H NMR
(CD3OD): d = 4.04 (dd, J=2.4, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (t, J=2.3 Hz, 1H),
4.48 (t, J=10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (dd, J=2.4, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (dd, J=9.3,
10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.80 (t, J=10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.32 8.11 (m, 15H); LC-MS: m/z:
493 [M+H]+.
Conclusion
We demonstrated highly efficient molecular evolution on a
myo-inositol model by combining intramolecular acyl migra-
tion and both kinetic and thermodynamic selectors. We be-
lieve that intramolecular acyl migration is applicable to an
even large number of dynamic carbohydrate libraries, and if
coupled with a broad range of selectors, this method will
open a wide range of applications.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Petroleum Research Fund from the
American Chemical Society.
[1] a) S. Otto, R. L. E. Furlan, J. K. M. Sanders, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2002, 6, 321 327; b) S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins,
J. K. M. Sanders, J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 938 993;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898 952; c) J. M. Lehn, A. V. Eli-
seev, Science 2001, 291, 2331 2332; d) C. Karan, B. L. Miller, Drug
Discovery Today 2000, 5, 67 75.
[2] a) P. A. Brady, R. P. Bonar-Law, S. J. Rowan, C. J. Suckling, J. K. M.
Sanders, Chem. Commun. 1996, 319 320; b) P. A. Brady, J. K. M.
Sanders, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 3237 3253; c) G.
Kaiser, J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Commun. 2000, 1763 1764.
[3] R. J. Lins, S. L. Flitsch, N. J. Turner, E. Irving, S. A. Brown, Angew.
Chem. 2002, 114, 3555 3557; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3405
3407.
[4] a) S. L. Roberts, R. L. E. Furlan, S. Otto, J. K. M. Sanders, Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 1625 1633; b) R. L. E. Furlan, Y. F. Ng, S.
Otto, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8876 8877;
c) G. R. L. Cousins, R. L. E. Furlan, Y. F. Ng, J. E. Redman, J. K. M.
Sanders, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 437 442; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 423 428; d) A. Star, I. Goldberg. B. Fuchs, Angew. Chem.
2000, 112, 2797 2801; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2685 2689;
e) O. Storm, U. L¸ning, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 793 798.
[5] T. Giger, M. Wigger, S. Audetat, S. A. Benner, Synlett 1998, 688
692.
[6] a) S. Otto, R. L. E. Furlan, J. K. M. Sanders, Science 2002, 297, 590
593; b) S. Otto, R. L. E. Rurlan, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 12063 12064; c) O. Ramstrˆm, J. M. Lehn, ChemBio-
Chem 2000, 1, 41 48.
[7] a) A. V. Eliseev, M. I. Nelen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1147
1148; b) A. V. Eliseev, M. I. Nelen, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 825 834.
[8] a) M. Crego-Calama, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew.
Chem. 2000, 112, 771 774; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 755
758; b) F. Hof, C. Nuckolls, J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
4251 4252.
Experimental Section
Materials and general methods: All reactions were performed in oven-
dried glassware under positive nitrogen pressure. Unless otherwise noted,
starting materials and solvents were purchased from Aldrich and Acros
organics and used without purification. Analytical TLC was carried out
on Merck 60 F254 silica gel plate (0.25 mm layer thickness) and visualiza-
tion was done with UV light, and/or by spaying with a 5% solution of
phosphomolybdic acid followed by charring with a heat gun. Column
chromatography was performed on Merck 60 silica gel (230 400 mesh).
1H NMR (200 MHz) spectra were determined on Varian Genini 200 spec-
trometer. Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) rela-
tive to internal standard as tetramethylsilane, and coupling constants (J)
are in Hertz (Hz). All compounds were identified by LC-MS (Agilent
Technologies) using a C18 column (4.6î150 mm) with 65 minutes of elu-
tion time using a solution of H2O/CH3CN/MeOH in a ratio of 52:18:30
(containing 0.1% acetic acid) with a UV detector at l=250 and 230 nm
and an electrospray ionization source.
Molecular amplification experiment with pre-equilibrium: DBU (20 mL,
0.13 mmol) was added at room temperature to a solution of 4 (1mg,
2.0 mmol) in acetonitrile (20 mL). After the reaction mixture was stirred
for 1.5 h, the full migration of 12 isomers was confirmed by HPLC-MS. A
solution of boric acid (2 mg, 0.032 mmol) in DMSO (50 mL) or phenyl
boronic acid (3.75 mg, 0.032 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture.
The change of the distribution was analyzed by HPLC-MS.[13]
Molecular amplification experiment without pre-equilibrium: Boric acid
(2 mg, 0.032 mmol) in DMSO (50 mL) or phenyl boronic acid (3.75 mg,
0.032 mmol), and DBU (20 mL, 0.13 mmol) were added at room tempera-
[9] a) S. Choudhary, J. R. Morrow, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4270 4272;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4096 4098; b) E. Stulz, Y. F. Ng,
3546
¹ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3543 3547