2688
W.-C. Gao, C. Zhang / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 2687–2690
OH I OH
O
O
I
O
O
I
O
O
I
O
OMeI OMe
C1
C1
C1
SOCl2 (10 eq)
MeOH, 60 o
O
O O
O
O
O
C
5
6
3
7
8
, 90%
δ 105.5 ppm δ 115.2 ppm δ 125.7 ppm
CH3MgI (5 eq)
I
2 (3 eq)
Et2O, reflux
Figure 3. NMR signals of the carbon atom attached to the iodine atom.
OH I OH
OH I OMe
O
+
10
, 22%
9, 64%
tBuOCl (1.5 eq)
CHCl3, 1.5 h
O
I
O
5, 81%
Scheme 1. Synthesis of iodinane 5.
Figure 4. X-ray crystal structure of iodinane 5.
ing 8 to the conventional protocol for the preparation of tertiary
alcohol,10 the reaction of 8 with methyl Grignard reagent resulted
in the loss of the iodine atom in the diol product. Therefore, the
additional molecular iodine was required to trap the generated
phenyl cation. The desired diol 9 was produced in 64% yield, along
with a minor product, methyl 3-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-iodo-
benzoate (10),11 which could serve as the precursor of iodinane
6. After the diol 9 reacted with tert-butyl hypochlorite (tBuOCl),
the (dialkoxy)iodinane 5 was afforded in 81% yield (Scheme 1).12
Iodinane 5 is a stable compound, which could be stored for several
months at room temperature without any detectable decomposi-
tion. Starting from the benzoate 10, the other bicyclic iodinane 6
could be readily accessed after hydrolysis with LiOH followed by
the oxidation with tBuOCl (Scheme 2).13
These two bicyclic hypervalent iodine(III) compounds are iden-
tified on the basis of NMR spectroscopic data, high resolution mass
spectrometry, and single crystal X-ray analysis. 13C NMR analysis
indicated a downfield shift of the signal for the carbon atom
attached to the iodine atom: the shift from d 94.2 ppm to
d 105.5 ppm in the iodinane 5, and the shift from d 90.7 ppm to
d 115.2 ppm in the iodinane 6, which are consistent with what is
observed in other hypervalent iodine(III) compounds.14 It was
noted that there was a 10-ppm motion to the downfield in the
bicyclic hypervalent iodine(III) compounds when an ether ring is
replaced by a lactone ring (Fig. 3).
Both of these two bicyclic iodinanes have good solubility in
commonly organic solvents such as dichloromethane (5, 4 mg/
mL; 6, 2.8 mg/mL) and ethyl acetate (5, 4.5 mg/mL; 6, 4.4 mg/
mL). The single crystal of iodinane 5 was grown from the mixed
solvent of dichloromethane and ethyl acetate, and the single crys-
tal of iodinane 6 was obtained in the solvent of dichloromethane.
As is observed in iodosodilactone 3, these two crystal structures
have roughly coplanar geometry. For the structure of 5 (Fig. 4),
the five-membered rings are slightly distorted from planarity (tor-
sion angles O1–I1–C1–C2 = 9.27(15)°, O2–I1–C1–C6 = 8.10(16)°);
when one of the ether rings is replaced by the lactone ring, just
as the structure of iodinane 6 (Fig. 5), the lactone ring bends more
slightly (torsion angle O1–I1–C1–C6 = 8.77(19)°, O2–I1–C1–
C2 = 2.67(19)°). And, as for the iodosodilactone 3 bearing two
lactone rings, all of the lactone atoms are almost coplanar (torsion
angles 0.4(4)° and 0.5(4)° respectively).
Figure 5. X-ray crystal structure of iodinane 6.
Table 1
Selected intramolecular bond lengths and bond angles of bicyclic hypervalent
iodine(III) reagents
Entry
Structure
O–I–O angle/°
I–O bond length/Å
Ref.
O
I
O
F3C
F3C
CF3
CF3
2.113(3)
2.077(3)
1
158.2(1)
7
tBu
2
O
O
I
O
2.0919(15)
2.0994(15)
2
3
4
157.46(6)
156.28(9)
155.21(14)
This work
This work
9
5
I
O
2.047(2)
2.212(3)
O
6
O
O
I
O
2.126(4)
2.141(4)
O
3
The O–I–O angle is also an important parameter in the struc-
tural analysis of hypervalent iodine reagents. To give a clear com-
parison, the O–I–O angles of existing bicyclic hypervalent
iodine(III) reagents are listed in Table 1. A slightly greater deviation
from 180° is found when all the fluorine atoms are replaced by
hydrogen atoms (Table 1, entry 1 vs entry 2). The change of ring
system from an ester ring to a lactone ring also affects the O–I–O
angle, which becomes smaller when the lactone ring is introduced
(entry 2 vs entry 3; entry 3 vs entry 4).
Another structural parameter, the O–I bond lengths of iodinane
5 and 6, are also revealed according to the X-ray analysis (Table 1).
Compared with bicyclic iodinane 2, the intramolecular I–O bonds
in the compound 5 are more equal (entry 1 vs entry 2). And, intro-
ducing a lactone ring would break this balance. For example, the
intramolecular I–O bond length in the lactone ring of compound
6 is 2.212(3) Å, which is longer than the I–O bond length in the
ether ring (2.074(2) Å). A comparison of the intramolecular I–O
O
I
O
OH I OCH
O
3 LiOH (3 eq)
MeOH, rt
tBuOCl (1.5 eq)
CHCl3
O
10
6, 53% for two steps
Scheme 2. Synthesis of iodinane 6.