Organic Letters
Letter
co-workers11a developed an efficient method for the electro-
chemical C−H cyanation of arenes by using NaCN as the
cyano source. Sun and co-workers11b,c described an electro-
chemical oxidative C−H cyanation of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines
and quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones. Based on the importance of
indoles and our interest in the electrochemical C−H
functionalization,12 we herein report a site-selective electro-
chemical C(sp2)−H cyanation of indoles for the synthesis of
indole nitriles with TMSCN as a cyanation reagent and tris(4-
bromophenyl)amine13 serves as a redox catalyst, achieving
better regioselectivity (Scheme 1b).
First, 1-phenyl-1H-indole 1 and TMSCN were selected as
model substrates for the optimization of the electrosynthesis
conditions. The electrochemical C−H cyanation was per-
formed in an undivided cell equipped with a reticulated
vitreous carbon (RVC) anode and a platinum cathode at a
constant current of 10 mA (Table 1). When the reaction was
carried out at room temperature for 2.5 h with tris(4-
bromophenyl)amine 4 (5 mol %) and NaOH (1.0 equiv) as a
basic additive in an electrolyte solution of nBu4NBF4 in
MeCN/H2O (11:1) under argon atmosphere, the C2-
cyanation product 2 was obtained in 80% yield with C3-
cyanation product 3 in 5% yield (entry 1). The reaction
regioselectivity and yield were reduced in the absence of 4
(entry 2). Other catalysts such as 5−7 were not more effective
(entries 3−5). Electricity (entry 6) and the amount of NaOH
(entries 7−9) were pivotal for success. The basic additive has a
great influence on the electrosynthesis; Na2CO3 (entry 10),
NaHCO3 (entry 11), NaOAc (entry 12), and NaOtBu (entry
13) failed to give better results. When MeCN or MeCN/H2O
(5:1) was used as solvent, lower yields were obtained (entries
14 and 15). Product 2 could be obtained in 73% or 33% yield
when the reactions were performed with 1.5 or 1.0 equiv of
TMSCN (entries 16 and 17). The yields of 2 were slightly
decreased when the electrosynthesis was conducted in the
absence of nBu4NBF4 (entry 18) or under air (entry 19).
After the optimized reaction conditions were defined, we
then explored the substrate scope of the electrochemical C−H
cyanation. 3-Alkyl-substituted indoles reacted with TMSCN
successfully to afford C2-cyanation products in which methyl
(8), TBS-protected alcohol (9), free alcohol (10), amino acid
methyl ester (11), amide (12), acrylate (13), and electron-
deficient methyl formate (14) all could be tolerated under mild
electrosynthesis conditions (Scheme 2).
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
Using 2-substituted indoles as the substrates, C3-cyanation
products (15−18) were conveniently prepared in moderate to
good yields (Scheme 2). Furthermore, the electrosynthesis
could tolerate a wide range of N-alkyl moieties in 2,3-
unsubstituted indoles, including methyl (19), benzyl (20),
isopropyl (21), cyclopropyl (22), allyl (23), and propargyl
(24), generating C2-cyanation products preferentially (Scheme
2). The C2 position of indole with a higher positive charge
could react more easily with TMSCN.11d The indole substrate
with ibuprofen reacted with TMSCN to produce the C2-
cyanation product 25 in 58% yield (Scheme 2). Simulta-
neously, the electrosynthesis reaction showed broad compat-
ibility with 4-substituted indoles (26−28), 5-substituted
indoles (29−31), 6-substituted indole (32), and 7-substituted
indole (33) (Scheme 2). The C−H cyanation product 34
could not be obtained due to the higher oxidation potential of
indole (Scheme 2). However, the reactions of benzofuran and
benzothiophene with TMSCN could not occur under the
standard conditions or in the absence of catalyst 4 (see the
Subsequently, we investigated the electrocatalytic C−H
cyanation of arenes to synthesize aromatic nitriles14 (Scheme
3). These reactions of substrates containing 1,3,5-trimethox-
ybenzene (35), methyl(naphthalen-2-yl)sulfane (36), 2-
methoxynaphthalene (37), 1-methylquinoxalin-2(1H)-one
(38), and 1-phenyl-1H-pyrrole (39) proceeded well to afford
C−H cyanation products. α-Aminonitriles (40 and 41) could
be obtained through electrochemical C(sp3)−H cyanation15 of
N,N-dimethylaniline and 1-phenylpyrrolidine. Moreover, the
electrochemical cyanation reactions of electron-rich arenes
could be conducted in the absence of tris(4-bromophenyl)-
amine 4. The C−H cyanation products also could be obtained
in moderate to good yields under the direct electrolysis
conditions.
b
entry
deviation from standard conditions
yield of 2/3 (%)
c
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
none
no 4
5 as catalyst
6 as catalyst
7 as catalyst
no electricity
no NaOH
NaOH (1.5 equiv) as base
NaOH (0.5 equiv) as base
Na2CO3 (1.0 equiv) as base
NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv) as base
NaOAc (1.0 equiv) as base
tBuONa (1.0 equiv) as base
MeCN as solvent
MeCN/H2O (5:1) as solvent
TMSCN (1.5 equiv)
TMSCN (1.0 equiv)
no nBu4NBF4
80 /5
56/19
20/5 (62)
49/13
70/12
0/0 (99)
0/0 (80)
73/10 (6)
26/trace (45)
16/trace (47)
7/0 (48)
29/trace (37)
52/11 (12)
16/0 (27)
16/trace (50)
73/6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
33/5 (34)
60/8 (5)
62/7 (5)
under air
To demonstrate the practicality of the electrochemical C−H
cyanation reaction, the gram-scale synthesis of 16 was achieved
with a constant current of 62 mA at room temperature for 7 h
in 90% yield (Scheme 4). In addition, the C−H cyanation
products 16 and 24 could easily be transformed into
nBu4NBF4 (0.15 mmol), MeCN (5.5 mL), H2O (0.5 mL), argon, 2.5
5984
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5983−5987