2054
M. P. Winters et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24 (2014) 2053–2056
supported Ph3P and CCl4 to give hydrazonyl chloride 6.7 Upon
treatment with TEA in toluene at 100 °C, 6 undergoes an intramo-
lecular 3+2 cycloaddition of the nitrilimine on the alkyne to give
the desired 3-bromotetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazole 7.9 The
3-aryl/heteroaryl substituent is installed by Suzuki coupling of
the 3-bromopyrazole with aryl or heteroaryl boronic acids, and
the Boc is removed by treatment with TFA to give key intermediate
8.10
Table 1
SAR at the 5-position of the pyrrolopyrazole
R2
Cl
N
N
N
R1
The next scheme shows the functionalization of the tetrahydro-
pyrrole nitrogen (Scheme 2). Treatment with sulfonyl chlorides or
acid chlorides in the presence of base gives the sulfonamides 9 or
amides 10, respectively. Derivatives with aryls or heteroaryls di-
rectly attached to the nitrogen were made by Buchwald/Hartwig
couplings 11. Reductive amination with aldehydes gives the ali-
phatic and benzylic derivatives 12.
Our initial efforts focused on optimizing the groups at
2-, 3-, and 5-positions of the bicyclic heterocycle. Solubility was
low for our initial compounds, so basic groups, such as pyridyl,
were installed in an attempt to increase solubility while maintain-
ing potency in the Functional Drug Screening System (FDSS)
assay.11 The initial hits also suffered from poor RLM stability.
RLM stability was important because stable compounds were nec-
essary to show activity in the initial in vivo model, the rat Com-
plete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) radiant heat model.
Compd no.
R1
R2
FDSS IC50 (nm)
RLMb (%)
a
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Et
4-Cl-Ph
pyrid-2-yl
CH2-4-Cl-Ph
CH2-pyrid-4-yl
CONMe2
Boc
COCF3
SO2Me
SO2iPr
SO2-cyclohexyl
SO2NMe2
SO2-morpholine
SO2-piperidine
SO2CH2CH2NHMs
SO2Bn
OMe
Et
Et
Et
Et
OMe
OMe
OCF3
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
61%
34%
36%
1
a
NT
18
18
10
10
NT
100
3
a
300
280
170
73
180
21
10
16
2
12
13
5
14
13
1
9.0
1.8
4.0
9.0
27
a
Substitution on the nitrogen at the 5-position of the pyrrolopy-
razole gave a range of potencies and was the most tolerant of di-
verse substitution (Table 1). Simple alkyl groups, such as ethyl
% Inhibition at 1
% Remaining after 10 min incubation with rat liver microsomes.
lM.
b
13, were not favored. Direct aryl and heteroaryl substitution as
well as benzyl substitution were also not tolerated, presumably
due to the basicity of the nitrogen in the ring. Amides, ureas and
carbamates are somewhat more potent, as evidenced by 18, 19
and 20. The most fruitful substitutions in this series were the
5-position sulfonamides and sulfamides. Methanesulfonamide 21
exhibited relatively high potency, and that of isopropyl sulfon-
amide 22 was 2-fold higher. However, cyclic sulfamides, such as
25 and 26 were the most potent compounds made in this sub-ser-
ies. Longer chain sulfonamides and sulfamides exhibited reduced
potency. RLM stability remained poor for all of the potent com-
pounds in this series; and only the weakly active trifluoroacetyl
(20), wherein R2 is OCF3, had good RLM stability.
Next, a number of substituents on the aromatic ring at the 2-po-
sition of the pyrazole were explored (Table 2). Metabolite identifi-
cation studies on 22 showed that loss of the methyl from the
o-methoxy was the major metabolite, so a number of substituents
on that ring were explored in an attempt to mitigate this issue.
Methoxy 22 and ethoxy 29 were both quite potent; however, the
more electron-withdrawing trifluoromethoxy substituent 30, lost
some potency. Contrary to our hypothesis, the ethyl substituent
31 did not afford greater RLM stability and exhibited diminished
potency as well. Similarly, the dimethylamino substituent 32 also
did not improve the RLM stability, although potency was restored.
Substitution with methyl and fluoro at the 4-position reduced po-
tency somewhat; however, reversing the methyl and methoxy 35
led to a much more dramatic loss of potency. Fused rings 36 and
37 did not enhance the potency. Attempts to adjust the poor
RLM stability by making numerous changes to this ring did not re-
sult in any improvement except for 34, the least potent compound
in this series. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that
larger ortho substituents, such as methoxy, are necessary for inhib-
itory activity, possibly due to the angle of the aromatic ring to the
pyrazole. An electron-rich ring also seems important for N-type
inhibitory activity; however, this SAR runs counter to RLM
stability.
Br
Boc
a
b
N
O
Boc
N
O
OH
OH
4
5
R1
Br
R1
N
N
R2
Br
c
N
d
N
Boc
N
N
Boc
7
N
H
N
R1
N
H
Cl
8
6
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) Br2, KOH; (b) (i) i-BuOCOCl, NMM,
R1NHNH2, DCM; (ii) PS-Ph3P, CCl4, ACN, 50 °C; (c) TEA, toluene, 100 °C; (d) (i)
R2B(OH)2, Pd(OAc)2, (o-tol)3P, Na2CO3; (ii) TFA.
R1
N
R1
N
R2
R2
N
N
N
N
SO2R3
R3
d
a
9
12
R1
N
R2
N
N
H
8
b
c
R1
R1
R2
N
R2
N
N
N
N
N
COR3
R3
10
11
Substitution on the 3-aryl ring did not improve potency over
the 4-chlorophenyl starting point 22 (Table 3), and removing the
aryl completely 38 or substituting bromine 39 resulted in a
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) R3SO2Cl, TEA; (b) R3COCl, TEA or R3COOH,
EDC; (c) R3Br or R3I, Pd2dba3, BINAP, Cs2CO3, toluene, 100 °C (d) R3CHO,
NaBH(OAc)3.