128
W. Yin et al. / Dyes and Pigments 107 (2014) 127e132
d
(ppm): 7.77 (t, 1H, J ¼ 4.8 Hz), 7.49 (t, 2H, J ¼ 3.6 Hz), 6.98 (m, 1H),
6.59 (d, 2H, J ¼ 2.1 Hz), 6.42 (m, 4H), 4.38 (s, 2H).
2.3.3. Synthesis of compound 1
Compound 3 (346 mg, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in absolute
methanol (20 mL). 3,4-dihydroxybenzalhyde (138 mg, 1.0 mmol)
was added and the mixture was heated at reflux for 4 h. The pre-
cipitate produced was filtered and washed with cold ethanol. The
crude product was purified by recrystallization from ethanol to
afford 1 as brown solid (420 mg, 90%). M.p.: >300 ꢁC (dec); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d (ppm): 9.88 (s, 2H), 9.39 (s, 1H), 9.18 (s, 1H),
8.76 (s, 1H), 7.86 (dd, J ¼ 6.1, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.64e7.47 (m, 2H), 7.06 (dd,
J ¼ 5.9, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (s, 1H), 6.70e6.58 (m, 4H), 6.45 (m, 4H). 13
C
Scheme 1. The routes of synthesis of compound 1.
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6), d 163.32, 158.42, 152.03, 150.85, 150.70,
148.34,145.56, 133.60, 128.98, 128.90,127.95,125.71,123.53,122.96,
120.70, 115.46, 112.29, 112.25, 110.21, 102.45, 65.07. ESI-MS (-p) (m/
z): 465.75 ([MꢀH]ꢀ), 501.58 ([Mþ2H2OꢀH]ꢀ), 525.33
([MþCH3CO2HꢀH]ꢀ), 931.25 ([2MꢀH]ꢀ)
from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (China) and the con-
centration was determined by titration with Na2S2O3.
2.2. Measurements
2.4. Determination of quantum yield
The UVevis spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35
spectrophotometer. Fluorescence measurements were performed
at room temperature on a Perkin Elmer LS-55 spectrophotometer
or Hitachi Fluorescence spectrophotometer-F-4600, and Fluores-
cein was used as a standard for the determination of fluorescence
quantum yields. The biological imaging tests were carried out with
an Olympus FV-1000 and Leica TCS-SP5 laser scanning confocal
fluorescence microscopes. 1H NMR and 13C NMR were measured on
a Bruker AV-300 spectrometer with chemical shifts reported in
ppm (in DMSO-d6 or CDCl3, TMS as internal standard). Mass spectra
were recorded using a Thermo Finnigan LCQ Duo electrospray mass
spectrometer in positive ion mode by direct infusion, with spray
voltage 4.5 kV and capillary temperature of 200 ꢁC.
The fluorescence quantum yields were determined using fluo-
rescein as a reference with a known V value of 0.89 in EtOH [34].
The sample and the reference were excited at the same wavelength
(
lex ¼ 480 nm), maintaining nearly equal absorbance (0.06). The
quantum yield was calculated according to the following eqn (1):
ꢀ
.
ꢁ
FS
F
=
¼ ðAS A Þ ꢂ ðAbs Abs Þ ꢂ h2S h2R
;
(1)
=
=
R
R
R
S
where VS and VR are the fluorescence quantum yields of the
sample and the reference, respectively; AS and AR are the emission
areas of the sample and the reference, respectively; AbsS and AbsR
are the corresponding absorbance of the sample and the reference
solution at the wavelength of excitation; hS and hR are the refractive
indices of the sample and the reference, respectively.
2.3. Synthesis of compound 1 (probe 1)
2.5. Cell culture
As shown in Scheme 1, the probe 1 (compound 1) was readily
synthesized by treating fluorescein with methanol using H2SO4 as
catalyst, which was followed by hydrazine hydrate and 3,4-
dihyrdoxybenzaldehyde. The structure of probe 1 was confirmed
by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, ESI-MS. Compound 2 and 3 were synthesized
according to our previous procedures [33].
RAW264.7 macrophages were first incubated with LPS (1
and IFN-
(50 ng/mL) in culture medium for 4.5 h at 37 ꢁC, and then
were stimulated with PMA (10 nM) for 45 min at 37 ꢁC. Subse-
quently, part of the treated cells was incubated with -methionine
(300
M) for 40 min at 37 ꢁC. After washed with PBS buffer (0.10 M,
pH 7.4) for three times, all the cells were incubated with probe 1
(10
M) in culture medium for 30 min at 37 ꢁC. Before imaging, the
mg/mL)
g
L
m
2.3.1. Synthesis of compound 2
m
To fluorescein (1.0 g, 3.1 mmol) methanol solution (10 mL) in a
25 mL round-bottom flask, was added concentrated sulfuric acid
(98%) (1 mL). The solution was refluxed and stirred for 4 h. After
cooling, excess methanol was removed under reduced pressure and
excess water was added to the residue. The red solid formed was
washed with water several times and filtered in vacuum until
almost free from fluorescence. After dried in vacuum, 0.95 g red
solid fluorescein methyl ester 2 was obtained with a yield of 91%.
cells were washed again with PBS (0.10 M, pH 7.4) for three times.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Selectivity studies
To evaluate whether probe 1 can selectively respond to OClꢀ
under simulated physiological conditions (pH ¼ 7.4), the fluores-
cence responses of probe 1 to other potentially competing ROS/
RNS, were also performed. As shown in the selectivity profiles
(Fig. 1), only OClꢀ incurs a dramatic fluorescence enhancement for
probe 1. Other ROS or RNS, including H2O2, t-BuOOH, NOꢀ2 , NO3ꢀ,
and S2O28ꢀ, exert no obvious spectral changes.
M.p.: 212e214 ꢁC; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)
d (ppm): 8.31 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 7.8 Hz), 7.79 (m, 2H), 7.34 (d, 1H, J ¼ 7.2 Hz), 7.28 (d, 2H,
J ¼ 3.6 Hz), 7.19 (d, 2H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz), 7.08 (dd, 2H, J1 ¼ 9.3 Hz,
J2 ¼ 2.1 Hz), 3.63 (s, 3H).
2.3.2. Synthesis of compound 3
Compound 2 (0.40 g) and hydrazine hydrate (0.24 g, 4.8 mmol)
were added to methanol (5 mL), refluxed and stirred for 6 h. After
collecting by filtration, the light brown precipitate was washed by a
small amount of methanol and water. 0.41 g straw yellow fluores-
cein hydrazone 3 was dried in vacuum and then obtained with a
yield of 98%. M.p.: 252e253 ꢁC; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz)
In addition, probe 1 was treated with a wide variety of cations
and anions to examine the selectivity. As shown in Fig. 3, the
addition of ClOꢀ induced a significant redshift of the fluorescence
emission spectra. However, representative species such as Liþ, Naþ,
Kþ, Mg2þ, Ca2þ, Zn2þ, Cu2þ, Al3þ, Clꢀ, CH3COOꢀ, SO42ꢀ, CO23ꢀ, elicited
almost no changes in the fluorescence spectra. Furthermore, the