B. Guo et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 3232–3234
3233
ketone using Matteson’s procedure.8 We were delighted to learn
Table 2
Vinyl oxirane substrate scope
that treatment of 1 with diethyl dithiophosphoric acid in toluene
at room temperature resulted in clean conversion to a 15:1 ratio
of allylic alcohols 2 and 3, wherein the Z-isomer (2) was the major
product. Remarkably, this mildly acidic sulfur nucleophile not only
added exclusively at C4 (1,4-addition), while suppressing the com-
peting hydride shift pathway, but it also afforded the desired (Z)-
1,4-addition product. When the similarly acidic diethyl phosphoric
acid (O instead of S) was employed, hydride shift product 4 was
isolated as the major product. Treatment of the dithiophosphoric
acid with excess base, such as triethylamine (shown), or pre-made
metal salts resulted in no ring opening of 1. Clearly both the pres-
ence of sulfur and the acidic hydrogen are essential for the success
of this new selective ring opening reaction.
With these exciting ring opening results in hand, we next
decided to understand how solvents and phosphate substituents
would impact reaction efficiency and selectivity (Table 1). These
studies revealed that toluene is an excellent solvent for this reac-
tion, with benzene and chlorinated solvents also being suitable.
Absence of solvent (entry 8) does not impact efficiency or C4-
addition preference, but completely erodes the stereoselectivity.
Running the reaction at lower temperatures (entry 4) resulted in
improved stereoselectivity although accompanied by a significant
increase in reaction time. Changing the phosphate alkyl group from
ethyl to either methyl (entry 1) or isopropyl (entry 2) did not
change much apart from some loss of efficiency when a diisopropyl
substituent was employed.
With optimal reaction conditions identified, we investigated
seven additional vinyl oxirane substrates (Table 2). Large groups
at C2 result in excellent Z-selectivity (entries 1, 2, and 4). This
selectivity erodes a bit when the vinyl group contains an internal
substituent (entry 3) and all selectivity is lost when the vinyl group
is terminally substituted (entry 5). Interestingly, when the pure
E- and Z-isomer products from entry 5 are left standing in either
chloroform or toluene solutions at room temperature, both equili-
brate over time to an almost identical 2.5:1 Z/E-mixture.9 At this
point, the mechanism of this equilibration process is not known.10
When the vinyl oxiranes are not 1,1-disubstituted (entries 6–7) all
C4-addition selectivity is lost in favor of C2 (1,2-addition). For
butadiene monoxide (entry 8) there is no preference for 1,2- or
1,4-addition, with the 1,4-addition product of predominantly
E-configuration.
Entry Starting material
Product(s)
Yield
(%)
Ph
S
P
Ph
OEt
OEt
1
87
85
85
HO
S
O
Z/ E = 15:1
Ph
Ph
S
O
P
OEt
OEt
2
HO
Ph
S
Z/ E = 17:1
Ph
S
P
OEt
OEt
3
HO
S
O
Z/E = 6:1
only Z
Ph
S
P
Ph
HO
4
5
81
82
O
OEt
OEt
S
S
O
P
OEt
C5H11
HO
S
OEt
C5H11
Z/E = 1.5:1
H
S
P
O
O
O
OEt
OEt
S
S
6
7
71
83
C7H15
HO
HO
H
C7H15
H
H
S
P
OEt
Ph
OEt
Ph
OH
H
S
S
P
OH
H
OEt
S
P
OEt
8
75
OEt
OEt
+
S
1:1
Z/E = 1:13
8-membered ring phosphate transfer followed by a thiolate cycli-
zation to form a 3,6-dihydro-2H-thiopyran could be realized. We
were confident that the seven membered ring S to O mediated
phosphate transfer from 5 to 6 was a reasonable proposition,11
but less confident whether a 5-exo-tet cyclization to form 2,5-
dihydrothiofuran 8 or a 3-exo-trig cyclization pathway to form
vinyl thiirane 7 would follow.12
To our surprise, treatment of allylic alcohol 2 with sodium
hydride in THF at 40 °C smoothly transformed it to a single new
product, identified as vinyl thiirane 7.13 Clearly, the soft sulfur
nucleophile (sodium thiolate 6) prefers to undergo a 3-exo-trig
instead of a 5-exo-tet cyclization.
Having developed a new route to access substrates like 2, with
high Z-selectivity, we were in a position to evaluate their anionic
hopping behavior (Scheme 2). We had reported, for the
corresponding Z-homoallylic alcohol thiophosphate,4 that an
Table 1
Vinyl oxirane ring opening optimizations
What is the origin of the high Z-selectivity for 1,1-disubstituted
vinyl oxiranes (entries 1–4, Table 2)? We believed we can make
strong argument, based on the results presented in Scheme 1, that
Ph
Ph
Ph
S
P
S
OR
OR
S
P
OR
OR
P
S
HS
OR
OR
O
+
S
Table 1
OH
OH
1
2
3
S
P
Ph
Ph
Ph
OEt
S
OEt
OEt
S
P
HS
OEt
P
S
Entry
R
Solvent
T (°C)
t (h)
2:3
Yield (%)
O
OEt
OEt
toluene, rt
+
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Methyl
Isopropyl
Ethyl
Ethyl
Ethyl
Ethyl
Ethyl
Ethyl
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Benzene
CH2Cl2
rt
rt
rt
0
rt
rt
rt
rt
5
8
5
20
5
0.3
0.5
3
13:1
18:1
15:1
29:1
14:1
11:1
11:1
1.1:1
85
64
87
76
83
75
72
80
87%
OH
OH
1
1,4-selective
(Z-selective)
2
3
15
:
1
O
P
S
P
O
OEt
OEt
HO
CHCl3
No solvent
OEt
HS
2 eq. Et3N
toluene, rt
OEt
toluene, rt
Ph
NO
reaction
64%
1
4
1.2 equiv of freshly distilled dialkyl dithiophosphates were used for each experi-
ment. Olefin isomer ratios were determined by integrating crude 1H NMR. Yields
shown are isolated yields.
hydride shift
Scheme 1. Initial thiophosphate ring opening results.