10.1002/anie.201808605
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
the small-scale synthesis (7b: 75%, 1.4 mol) as did the
thioacetate cleavage and thioallylation to 9b (74%, 1.1 mol). The
final oxidation to ajoene 2 had superior yields (65%) as compared
to the small scale synthesis and 169 g (0.72 mol) of ajoene 2 was
isolated in ~90% purity as determined by HPLC and NMR
analysis.
Two ajoene products were examined; 2 (synthetic) as
synthesized above and ajoene 2 (garlic) extracted from garlic
using the thermal rearrangement conditions.[3] the results are
expressed as a mixture of E and Z ajoene. Both ajoene samples
are effective QSIs as shown by their inhibition of the fluorescence
values in Figure 1, where a reduction in fluorescence is directly
related to the down regulation of the QS gene lasB.
Much of the research interest in ajoene 2 resides in its biological
activity. It has been shown to have efficacy in a number of
biological studies that include antithrombotic and antifungal
activities.[11] In order to further evaluate 2, its activity in a biological
assay was also examined. Ajoene’s ability to act as a quorum
sensing inhibitor (QSI) was selected, as this is one of its more
recent remarkable biological properties. Quorum sensing (QS) is
a mechanism of cell-cell communication in bacteria facilitated by
the secretion and detection of signalling molecules such as N-acyl
homoserine lactones in Gram-negative bacteria.[12] QS allows
bacteria to synchronise specific gene expression which has an
impact on their pathogenicity and is thought to have a significant
role in the formation of biofilms. Recent studies have shown that
ajoene 2 is an effective QS inhibitor against Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus and could be utilised for
the treatment of chronic biofilm infections by exploiting the QS
system.[13] In this study, we employed a reporter strain (PaO1-
lasB-gfp)[13a] whereby QS gene expression was monitored over
time in response to ajoene treatment.
The samples show a very similar pattern of concentration-
dependent inhibition. This is reiterated in the IC50 calculations
where ajoene 2 (garlic) extracted from garlic had an IC50 value of
27.7 µM and synthetic ajoene 2 (synthetic) had an IC50 value of
28.5 µM. The IC50 values are comparable between the different
origins of ajoene 2.
In conclusion, we describe an efficient total synthesis of ajoene
from easily available starting materials. The simultaneous
introduction of the allyl moiety and the sulfoxide in the final step
allows a straightforward generation of the target molecule. Up-
scaling of the synthetic sequence was possible leading for the first
time to the synthesis of synthetic ajoene in larger amounts.
Synthetic ajoene and ajoene derived from garlic have been
investigated regarding their efficiency as quorum sensing
inhibitors.
Experimental Section
The vinyl disulfide 9a (0.140 g, 0.33 mmol) is dissolved in THF (3 mL) and
cooled to 0 °C under N2, and H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 0.075 mL, 0.66 mmol)
added dropwise. The mixture was allowed to stir for 1 h at 0 °C and then
warmed to rt (2 h). Sat. aq. NaHCO3 (5 mL) was added and the residue
was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic fractions
were washed with brine (2 × 10 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvent
was removed under vacuum and the resulting residue purified by column
chromatography to afford ajoene 2 (21 mg, 27%, E/Z = 1:1.8) as a pale-
yellow oil.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Acknowledgements
We thank Neem Biotech Ltd. and EPSRC for support and the
EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Facility, Swansea, for mass
spectrometric data.
2 (synthetic)
75 µM 37.5 µM
2 (garlic)
18.75 µM
Keywords: ajoene • allicin • garlic • organosulfur compounds •
Figure 1. Inhibition of a PaO1 lasB-gfp reporter strain, where inhibition of
selenoxide elimination
fluorescence is directly related to QS-controlled expression,
[1]
a) J. Borlinghaus, F. Albrecht, M. C. H. Gruhlke, I. D. Nwachukwu, A. J.
Slusarenko, Molecules 2014, 19, 12591–12618; b) H. V. Beretta, F.
Bannoud, M. Insani, F. Berli, P. Hirschegger, C. R. Galmarini, P. F.
Cavagnaro, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 55, 266–275; c) J. G.
Sheppard, J. P. McAleer, P. Saralkar, W. J. Geldenhuys, T. E. Long,
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 143, 1185–1195.
E. Block, Garlic and Other Alliums, RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2010.
a) E. Block, S. Ahmad, M. K. Jain, R. W. Crecely, R. Apitz-Castro, M.
R. Cruz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 8295–8296; b) E. Block, S.
Ahmad, J. L. Catalfamo, M. K. Jain, R. Apitz-Castro, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 7045–7055.
a) E. Block, B. Bechand, S. Gundala, A. Vattekkatte, K. Wang, S. S.
Mousa, K. Godugu, M. Yalcin, S. A. Mousa, Molecules 2017, 22, 2081.
C. H. Kaschula, R. Hunter, N. Stellenboom, M. R. Caira, S. Winks, T.
Ogunleye, P. Richards, J. Cotton, K. Zilbeyaz, Y. Wang, V. Siyo, E.
Ngarande, M. I. Parker, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 50, 236–254.
[6]
[7]
R. Hunter, C. H. Kashula, I. M. Parker, M. R. Caira, P. Richards, S.
Travis, F. Taute, T. Qwebani, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18,
5277–5279.
a) S. Yamada, T. Fujita, T. Mizoguchi, J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1954, 74,
963–966; b) D. Scholz, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1984, 259–263.
K. B. Sharpless, M. W. Young, J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 947–949.
C. Santi, R. Di Lorenzo, C. Tidei, L. Bagnoli, T. Wirth, Tetrahedron
2012, 68, 10530–10535.
[8]
[9]
[2]
[3]
[10] The scale-up reactions were performed by Onyx Scientific Ltd., UK.
[11] a) Y. Washiya, T. Nishikawa, T. Fujino, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
2013, 77, 2298–2301; b) Y. Jung, H. Park, H.-Y. Zhao, R. Jeon, J.-H.
Ryu, W.-Y. Kim, Mol. Cells 2014, 37, 547–553; c) D. Y. Yoo, W. Kim, S.
M. Nam, M. Yoo, S. Lee, Y. S. Yoon, M.-H. Won, I. K. Hwang, J. H.
Choi, Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 72, 1–7; d) J.-A. Choi, S.-N. Cho, Y.-
J. Lim, J. Lee, D. Go, S.-H. Kim, C.-H. Song, Innate Immun. 2018, 24,
79–88.
[4]
[5]
[12] K. Papenfort, B. L. Bassler, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576–588.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.