3
reaction between α-iodo acetophenone (1aa) and thiourea (2)
(Scheme 2 (3)). Moreover, intermediate 2-aminothiozole (4a)
could be obtained from acetophenone (1a) and thiourea (2) in
Based on the aforementioned results and previous reports, a
plausible mechanism for the current reaction was proposed as
follows with acetophenone (1a) as an example (Scheme 5).
Initially, substrate 1a was converted into the intermediate α-iodo
acetophenone (1aa) in the presence of I2. Subsequently, the
oxidation of intermediate 1aa by DMSO occurred to yield
intermediate phenylglyoxal (1ab) or hydrated hemiacetal 1ac.
Meanwhile, α-iodo acetophenone (1aa) reacted with thiourea (2)
to generate intermediate 2-aminothiozole (4a). Intermediate 4a
could then be converted to 4b in the presence of I2 and DMS.4
The reaction of hydrated hemiacetal 1ac with thiourea (2)
afforded intermediate A, which subsequently underwent a
Kornblum oxidation reaction to generate the desired product 3a.
In the process, the byproduct HI was oxidized by DMSO to
regenerate at least 0.5 equiv of iodine.9
o
EtOH at 78 C (Scheme 2 (4)). Furthermore, DMSO-D6 was
subjected to the transformation and the target molecule (3a’) was
obtained (Scheme 2 (5)), which indicated that the methylthio in 3
originated from DMSO.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, this work has proposed an iodine-promoted
self-sorting reaction network for the construction of
aminothiazole derivatives from readily-available methyl ketones
and thiourea. Notably, this metal-free transformation generated
five new bonds including two C-N bonds, one C-O bond and two
C-S bonds. Further studies towards the applications of this
reaction will be reported in due course.
Scheme 3. The controlled experiment to prove the mechanism.
Subsequently, 2-aminothiozole (4a) was used as a starting
material to react with 4’-methylacetophenone (1b) to form the
target molecule (Scheme 3). However, the product (3ab) could
not be obtained and the byproduct 5ab was separated, which
indicated that the 5-position of thiazole was more likely to react
with aryl methyl ketones than the amino of aminothiazole.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21032001 and 21272085). We
also acknowledge the excellent doctorial dissertation cultivation
grant from Central China Normal University (2013YBYB53).
References and notes
1. (a) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471; (b) Sheldon R. A. Pure
Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1233; (c) Anastas P.; Eghbali, N. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301; (d) Cao, J. J.; Zhou, F.; Zhou, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4976; (e) Zhu, Y. P.; Gao, Q. H.; Lian,
M.; Yuan, J. J.; Liu, M. C.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, A. X. Chem. Commun.
2011, 47, 12700.
Scheme 4. The step by step experiment for the addition of aryl methyl
ketones.
The proposed mechanism was further verified through a step
by step examination of the addition process of intermediate 2-
aminothiozole (4a) and aryl methyl ketones under the standard
conditions (Scheme 4). Intermediate 2-aminothiozole (4a) was
added in the vessel under the standard conditions for 4h. The
target molecules were then obtained following the addition of
various aryl methyl ketones. This confirmed that the 5-position of
thiazole was more likely to react with aryl methyl ketones than
the amino of aminothiazole.
2. For selected examples, see: (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke,
K. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2006; (b) Zhu, J. P.; Bienaymé, H.
Multicomponent Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005; (c)
Tietze, L. F. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115.
3. For selected examples, see: (a) Whitesides, G. M.; Ismagilov, R. F.
Science 1999, 284, 89; (b) Gerdts, C. J.; Sharoyan, D. E.;
Ismagilov, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6327; (c) Ganem, B.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 463.
4. Yin, G. D.; Zhou, B. H.; Meng, X. G.; Wu, A. X.; Pan, Y. J. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 2245.
5. Gao, M.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y. D.; Deng, C.; Cao, L. P.; Meng, X. G.;
Wu, A. X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1856.
6. Xue, W. J.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Y. P.; Wang, J. G.; Wu, A. X. Chem.
Commun. 2012, 48, 3485.
7. For selected examples, see: (a) Kornblum, N.; Powers, J. W.;
Anderson, G. J.; Jones, W. J.; Larson, H. O.; Levand, O.; Weaver,
W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 6562; (b) Kornblum, N.; Jones,
W. J.; Anderson, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 4113; (c)
Paquette, W. D.; Taylor, R. E. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 103.
8. (a) Chu, L.; Yue, X.; Qing, F. L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1644; (b)
Luo, F.; Pan, C.; Li, L.; Chen, F.; Cheng, J. Chem. Commun. 2011,
47, 5304; (c) Joseph, P. J. A.; Priyadarshini, S.; Kantam, M. L.;
Sreedhar, B. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 8276; (d) Dai, C.; Xu, Z.;
Huang, F.; Yu, Z.; Gao, Y. F. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4414.
9. Gao, M.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y. D.; Deng, C.; Shu, W. M.; Zhang, D.
X.; Cao, L. P.; She, N. F.; Wu, A. X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4026.
10. Zhu, Y. P.; Yuan, J. J.; Zhao, Q.; Lian, M.; Gao, Q. H.; Liu, M. C.;
Yang, Y.; Wu, A. X. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 173.
11. The details of the crystal data have been deposited with
CambridgeCrystallographic Data Centre as Supplementary
Publication, CCDC995977.
Scheme 5. The plausible mechanism of the present reaction.