.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Reaction discovery and ligand screening.[a,b,c]
Table 2: Scope of aryl iodides.[a,b,c]
[a] ArF =(4-CF3)C6F4. [b] 1a (0.2 mmol), PdCl2 (0.02 mmol), Ag2CO3
(0.6 mmol), PhI (0.8 mmol), ligand (0.04 mmol), t-AmylOH (0.5 mL),
1408C, 24 h. [c] Yield determined by NMR spectroscopy with CH2Br2 as
the internal standard.
[a] ArF =(4-CF3)C6F4. [b] 1a (0.2 mmol), PdCl2 (0.02 mmol), Ag2CO3
(0.6 mmol), ArI (0.8 mmol), 2,5-lutidine (0.04 mmol), t-AmylOH
(0.5 mL), 1408C, 24 h. [c] Yields of isolated products.
was formed in 11% yield as the only product. The observed
dramatic impact of ligand L1 on this reaction prompted us to
further test a variety of pyridine- or quinoline-based ligands.
Surprisingly, the use of simple pyridine L3 as the ligand
provided 3a in 68% yield and 2a in 23% yield. 2-Picoline
(L6) and 3-picoline (L7) also gave comparable yields. 2,6-
Dimethoxypyridine (L9) is highly selective for monoaryla-
tion, albeit in a relatively low yield (42% yield). Further
investigation reveals that lutidines L10, L11, and L12 are
more effective than other pyridine ligands, affording the
cyclized product 3a in 80–84% yields.
With these conditions in hand, we examined the scope of
aryl iodides with 1a to test the feasibility of preparing
a variety of 4-aryl-2-quinolinones 3 (Table 2). Reactions with
mono- or dimethyl substituted phenyl iodides yield 4-aryl-2-
quinolinones 3b–3e in 68–75% yields, with intramolecular
amidation occurring at the less hindered position of the aryl
group. para-Methoxyphenyl iodide was also reactive, afford-
ing the desired product 3 f in 60% yield. Electron-withdraw-
ing fluoro, chloro and trifluoromethyl groups are also well
tolerated (3g–3i), while the presence of a para-ester group
decreased the yield to 44% (3j).
While one-pot synthesis of 4-aryl-2-quinolinones from
a simple propionamide demonstrates excellent step economy,
the incorporation of two identical aryl groups into the
products results in limited structural diversity. In order to
address this issue, we envisioned the installation of two
distinct arenes through the mono-selective arylation of 1a to
yield various hydrocinnamic acid derivatives, followed by
subsequent secondary arylation with a different aryl iodide to
furnish heterodiaryl 2-quinolinones. Thus, we established
moderately effective ligandless conditions for mono-arylation
of 1a and prepared hydrocinnamic acid amides 2a–2e on
gram scale (see Supporting Information). Hydrocinnamide 2a
was then further reacted with different aryl iodides (Ar2I)
under ligand-mediated conditions to afford a set of diverse 4-
aryl-2-quinolinones 3k–3q in 62–86% yield, with the Ar2
group introduced regioselectively at the 4-position of the 2-
quinolinone moiety (Table 3). While the use of other less
hindered ligands L3 and L7 afforded the same regioselectiv-
ity, the yields decreased significantly (see Supporting Infor-
mation). Hydrocinnamides 2b–2e were also reacted with PhI
under the standard conditions to afford various 4-aryl-2-
quinolinones 3r–3u in 60–81% yield. Notably, previous
syntheses of 4-aryl-2-quinolinones by sequential Heck reac-
À
tion/C H lactamization use acrylamide as the starting mate-
rial and proceed through three distinct steps catalyzed by
three different catalysts.[7c] In addition, this method gave
a mixture of regioisomers when two different aryls are
incorporated into the products.
Considering that various 4-aryl-2-quinolinones contain
different aryl groups (Ar) on the nitrogen, we made efforts to
broaden the reaction scope by using differentially substituted
propionamide substrates 1, prepared from different anilines
and propionyl chloride (Table 4). Thus, cascade products 3v–
3z were prepared in 62–75% yield with 2,6-difluoro or
dichloro substitutions on the aryl ring (Ar). Further studies
show that the 2,6-disubstitutions are required for sufficient
reactivity. The amides derived from simple anilines also
proceeded to afford 3a1–3i1 in 40–54% yield. Methoxy (3e1),
OTs (3 f1), chloro (3h1), and bromo (3i1) groups on the aryl
ring are also amenable to further synthetic elaborations.
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!